Hi everybody,
Playing around with the FAMIX 2 specs and the LAN model I found something very strange: - I found an FAMIXAccess that accesses a FAMIXClass. According to the FAMIX 2 meta-model and also the annotations from Moose the accesses attribute of FAMIXAccess should be of type FAMIXAbstractStructuralEntity. But the FAMIXAccess instance with id 71 from LAN model accesses a FAMIXClass (Root::Smalltalk::LAN::LANInterface.initialize() -> DependentList_class). There are other examples too. How were those accesses build? It is correct?
Thanks, Adi D.
------------------------------ dipl.ing. Adrian DOZSA Programming Engineer mail: adi.dozsa@gmail.com web: http://adi.dozsa.googlepages.com/
I do not remember but I guess that the problem is that in famix2 there is no way to express class references (class A refers to class B).
so we used that because if in your code you have
A>>foo ^ B zork
Now in FAMIX30 this is different. You can have reference between classes.
Doru am I correct? I'm dead this evening.
Stef
On Jan 20, 2009, at 11:27 PM, Adrian DOZSA wrote:
Hi everybody,
Playing around with the FAMIX 2 specs and the LAN model I found something very strange:
- I found an FAMIXAccess that accesses a FAMIXClass. According to
the FAMIX 2 meta-model and also the annotations from Moose the accesses attribute of FAMIXAccess should be of type FAMIXAbstractStructuralEntity. But the FAMIXAccess instance with id 71 from LAN model accesses a FAMIXClass (Root::Smalltalk::LAN::LANInterface.initialize() -> DependentList_class). There are other examples too. How were those accesses build? It is correct?
Thanks, Adi D.
dipl.ing. Adrian DOZSA Programming Engineer mail: adi.dozsa@gmail.com web: http://adi.dozsa.googlepages.com/
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Hi,
Indeed this is correct. We knew this was a hack, and that is why we tried to solve this in FAMIX 3.0.
Cheers, Doru
On Jan 21, 2009, at 10:04 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
I do not remember but I guess that the problem is that in famix2 there is no way to express class references (class A refers to class B).
so we used that because if in your code you have
A>>foo
^ B zork
Now in FAMIX30 this is different. You can have reference between classes.
Doru am I correct? I'm dead this evening.
Stef
On Jan 20, 2009, at 11:27 PM, Adrian DOZSA wrote:
Hi everybody,
Playing around with the FAMIX 2 specs and the LAN model I found something very strange:
- I found an FAMIXAccess that accesses a FAMIXClass. According to
the FAMIX 2 meta-model and also the annotations from Moose the accesses attribute of FAMIXAccess should be of type FAMIXAbstractStructuralEntity. But the FAMIXAccess instance with id 71 from LAN model accesses a FAMIXClass (Root::Smalltalk::LAN::LANInterface.initialize() -> DependentList_class). There are other examples too. How were those accesses build? It is correct?
Thanks, Adi D.
dipl.ing. Adrian DOZSA Programming Engineer mail: adi.dozsa@gmail.com web: http://adi.dozsa.googlepages.com/
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every now and then stop and ask yourself if the war you're fighting is the right one."
-
Adrian DOZSA -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba