13 Jun
2008
13 Jun
'08
8:28 p.m.
I'm contemplating morbidly Meta and I was wondering why do we need to
have EMOF
for what we do at the meta-metamodel. It seems to me that we lost our
soul in the process
and especially now that nobody maintain the metapart. I have large
doubts.
I run the test of meta dn 59 are breaking ;(
I'm considering porting FAMIX2.1 to Squeak. I will call the class
FAMIX2Class.
Stef
13 Jun
13 Jun
8:32 p.m.
may be one advantage is that we may use fame to generate famix model
in other languages.
But do we need that?
Stef
On Jun 13, 2008, at 8:28 PM, stephane ducasse wrote:
I'm contemplating morbidly Meta and I was
wondering why do we need to
have EMOF
for what we do at the meta-metamodel. It seems to me that we lost our
soul in the process
and especially now that nobody maintain the metapart. I have large
doubts.
I run the test of meta dn 59 are breaking ;(
I'm considering porting FAMIX2.1 to Squeak. I will call the class
FAMIX2Class.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
14 Jun
14 Jun
2:05 a.m.
Yet another advantage is that Fame is maintained :).
And it's not necessarily the code generator, but that we have
exporters in several languages so that it is really easy to have data
in Moose from Java.
Cheers,
Doru
On Jun 13, 2008, at 8:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
may be one advantage is that we may use fame to
generate famix model
in other languages.
But do we need that?
Stef
On Jun 13, 2008, at 8:28 PM, stephane ducasse wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"Problem solving efficiency grows with the abstractness level of
problem understanding."
I'm contemplating morbidly Meta and I was
wondering why do we need to
have EMOF
for what we do at the meta-metamodel. It seems to me that we lost our
soul in the process
and especially now that nobody maintain the metapart. I have large
doubts.
I run the test of meta dn 59 are breaking ;(
I'm considering porting FAMIX2.1 to Squeak. I will call the class
FAMIX2Class.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
6035
days inactive
6036
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
stephane ducasse -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba