15 Jun
2007
15 Jun
'07
1:30 p.m.
Hello all,
I successfully extracted all the informationr related to all the classes in
the system but when I visualize these classes in the "Spaced System
Complexity" in MOOSE, all my classes which are parent or so-called "root"
classes of the system appear to inherit from the "Object" class of .NET
Framework. This is ok since if a class doesn't have a parent, I assign it to
inherit from object and whose stub parameter is set to true.
What really bothers me is that inheritance from the Object class should be
implicit in the visualization to emphasize the existance of lone classes or
classes without any hierarchy (therefore absence of encapsulation and
abstraction). But the relation with the object is explicit, that is, all the
classes are shown to inherit from the object class in the visualization. I
am attaching a screenshot of the visualization. Can someone please point
where I am getting it wrong?
Secondly, how do I represent the enumerated types present in the system?
.NET framework considers them as classes so they are reported as classes.
Usman
P.S if the screenshot is not readable, then the topmost class of all classes
is System.Object
15 Jun
15 Jun
1:40 p.m.
Dear Usman,
the best workaround is to remove Object from the Group of Classes
that you're visualizing.
cheers,
AA
On 15 Jun 2007, at 13:30 , Usman Bhatti wrote:
Hello all,
I successfully extracted all the informationr related to all the
classes in the system but when I visualize these classes in the
"Spaced System Complexity" in MOOSE, all my classes which are
parent or so-called "root" classes of the system appear to inherit
from the "Object" class of .NET Framework. This is ok since if a
class doesn't have a parent, I assign it to inherit from object and
whose stub parameter is set to true.
What really bothers me is that inheritance from the Object class
should be implicit in the visualization to emphasize the existance
of lone classes or classes without any hierarchy (therefore absence
of encapsulation and abstraction). But the relation with the object
is explicit, that is, all the classes are shown to inherit from the
object class in the visualization. I am attaching a screenshot of
the visualization. Can someone please point where I am getting it
wrong?
Secondly, how do I represent the enumerated types present in the
system? .NET framework considers them as classes so they are
reported as classes.
Usman
P.S if the screenshot is not readable, then the topmost class of
all classes is System.Object
<system_model.PNG>
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
9:27 p.m.
Hi Usman,
First of all, it's cool to see a visualization of a .Net system :).
Related to your problem, we get it in all systems we analyze. So, as
Adrian said, you should select only the classes that you are
interested in before visualizing them. If you just want all classes
that are not named Object, just open all classes and in the select
field from the bottom part you can write !'*Object', and after
pressing Select this will open another pane to the right with the
right group of classes.
Another solution is to mark as stub the entities that do not belong
to your application, but that still appear in the model. To do that
you have to add a property (stud true) to those entities.
Afterwards, you can use this property to distinguish between entities
in the model. So, in your case, you can select all classes, and you
can use {each isStub not} to get only the classes in your model.
As for your second question, if .Net considers them as classes, then
I guess having them as classes will do just fine.
Cheers,
Doru
On Jun 15, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Dear Usman,
the best workaround is to remove Object from the Group of Classes
that you're visualizing.
cheers,
AA
On 15 Jun 2007, at 13:30 , Usman Bhatti wrote:
--
www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba
www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba/blog/
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
Hello all,
I successfully extracted all the informationr related to all the
classes in the system but when I visualize these classes in the
"Spaced System Complexity" in MOOSE, all my classes which are
parent or so-called "root" classes of the system appear to inherit
from the "Object" class of .NET Framework. This is ok since if a
class doesn't have a parent, I assign it to inherit from object and
whose stub parameter is set to true.
What really bothers me is that inheritance from the Object class
should be implicit in the visualization to emphasize the existance
of lone classes or classes without any hierarchy (therefore absence
of encapsulation and abstraction). But the relation with the object
is explicit, that is, all the classes are shown to inherit from the
object class in the visualization. I am attaching a screenshot of
the visualization. Can someone please point where I am getting it
wrong?
Secondly, how do I represent the enumerated types present in the
system? .NET framework considers them as classes so they are
reported as classes.
Usman
P.S if the screenshot is not readable, then the topmost class of
all classes is System.Object
<system_model.PNG>
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
6400
days inactive
6400
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Adrian Kuhn -
Tudor Girba -
Usman Bhatti