Hi all,
a quick poll: which selection of metrics do you find the most useful when using a system complexity type visualisation, and what are your goals when using the visualisation?
AspectMaps has this view as a part, but I am reluctant to include all the options that are in the customisable system complexity view, because this is a loooooooooot. A subset would be less intimidating to the user ...
-- Johan Fabry jfabry@dcc.uchile.cl - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
I use the have the traditional ones: width = #numberOfAttributes height = #numberOfMethods color = #numberOfLinesOfCode
Regarding my goals, it really depends on the situation.
Alexandre
On 25 Jan 2010, at 14:03, Johan Fabry wrote:
Hi all,
a quick poll: which selection of metrics do you find the most useful when using a system complexity type visualisation, and what are your goals when using the visualisation?
AspectMaps has this view as a part, but I am reluctant to include all the options that are in the customisable system complexity view, because this is a loooooooooot. A subset would be less intimidating to the user ...
-- Johan Fabry jfabry@dcc.uchile.cl - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Exactly.
Doru
On 25 Jan 2010, at 18:44, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I use the have the traditional ones: width = #numberOfAttributes height = #numberOfMethods color = #numberOfLinesOfCode
Regarding my goals, it really depends on the situation.
Alexandre
On 25 Jan 2010, at 14:03, Johan Fabry wrote:
Hi all,
a quick poll: which selection of metrics do you find the most useful when using a system complexity type visualisation, and what are your goals when using the visualisation?
AspectMaps has this view as a part, but I am reluctant to include all the options that are in the customisable system complexity view, because this is a loooooooooot. A subset would be less intimidating to the user ...
-- Johan Fabry jfabry@dcc.uchile.cl - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"If you interrupt the barber while he is cutting your hair, you will end up with a messy haircut."
On 25 Jan 2010, at 14:44, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I use the have the traditional ones: width = #numberOfAttributes height = #numberOfMethods color = #numberOfLinesOfCode
OK, thanks!
Regarding my goals, it really depends on the situation.
Yes, well that's kind of obvious, no? ;-) That's why I asked in the plural.
Anyways, I think that in AspectMaps I will just keep the above metrics plus weightedMethodCount because it sounds cool :-P, and the amount of join point shadows.
FYI: a pic of the current state of AspectMaps. I dont have time this week to make new screenshots and movies, and from next week I am away from the computer until the end of feb, so I will do those things when I am back ...
-- Johan Fabry jfabry@dcc.uchile.cl - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
It looks really really cool! I am glad to see what people can do with Moose/Glamour/Mondrian. This is an excellent illustration!
Alexandre
On 26 Jan 2010, at 12:14, Johan Fabry wrote:
On 25 Jan 2010, at 14:44, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I use the have the traditional ones: width = #numberOfAttributes height = #numberOfMethods color = #numberOfLinesOfCode
OK, thanks!
Regarding my goals, it really depends on the situation.
Yes, well that's kind of obvious, no? ;-) That's why I asked in the plural.
Anyways, I think that in AspectMaps I will just keep the above metrics plus weightedMethodCount because it sounds cool :-P, and the amount of join point shadows.
FYI: a pic of the current state of AspectMaps. I dont have time this week to make new screenshots and movies, and from next week I am away from the computer until the end of feb, so I will do those things when I am back ...
<AM.tiff>
-- Johan Fabry jfabry@dcc.uchile.cl - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Johan Fabry -
Tudor Girba