done :)

On Jun 24, 2008, at 7:10 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:

Agree :)

Doru

On Jun 24, 2008, at 5:15 PM, stéphane ducasse wrote:

...

Hi Doru

There are several methods in MooseFamixModel that depend on MooseFamixExtensions. I suggest to move them there. Do we agree?

• la méthode hasSubclasses dans FAMIXClass

(Root::Smalltalk::SCG::Moose::FAMIXClass.hasSubclasses()-

...

numberOfChildren())

• la méthode hasSuperclasses dans FAMIXClass

(Root::Smalltalk::SCG::Moose::FAMIXClass.hasSuperclasses()-

...

numberOfParents()

)

• la méthode hasEmptyBody dans FAMIXAbstractBehaviouralEntity (2

invocations: Root ::Smalltalk ::SCG::Moose::FAMIXAbstractBehaviouralEntity.hasEmptyBody()-

...

numberOfAccesses()

et Root ::Smalltalk ::SCG::Moose::FAMIXAbstractBehaviouralEntity.hasEmptyBody()-

...

numberOfOutgoingInvocations()

)

Then in MooseUI

mooseKill <menuItem: 'Kill' nameKey: nil menu: #(#menuBar #tools #mooseUtilities) position: 1> SCG.Moose.MooseModel kill

depends on MooeUIExtensions So may be we should move it there.

Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog

"Obvious things are difficult to teach."

---

Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev