13 Nov
2009
13 Nov
'09
2:47 a.m.
Hi,
You might notice that in the rendering of MooseFinder is slightly
different. In particular, you will only get a limited amount of items
displayed in the group view.
This is due to a change in Glamour: we now use only the MorphTreeMorph
widget to render both lists and trees.
If you encounter issues, please report them.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
13 Nov
13 Nov
2:13 p.m.
Hi doru
can you tell us:
- does it means that MorphTreeMorph was too slow?
- what was the reason of the change?
- any information that would make us understand the tradeoffs.
Stef
On Nov 13, 2009, at 2:47 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
You might notice that in the rendering of MooseFinder is slightly different. In
particular, you will only get a limited amount of items displayed in the group view.
This is due to a change in Glamour: we now use only the MorphTreeMorph widget to render
both lists and trees.
If you encounter issues, please report them.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
2:28 p.m.
Any morph widget is too slow to display more than a couple of hundred
elements. The MorphTreeMorph is no exception.
What's more, when you have more than a couple of hundred, you do not
really need to see them all, because you want to manipulate them via a
query.
The filter just hides the data, but you can still manipulate it. So,
you actually do not lose much. A better approach would be to have a
list that expands automatically once you get at the bottom of the
visible items.
The reason for moving to the MorphTreeMorph are the followings:
- by depending on one single morph widget, we reduce the maintenance
team
- it is actively developed and maintained, which is not a given in the
Morphic world
- it offers a proper tree behavior
Cheers,
Doru
On 13 Nov 2009, at 14:13, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi doru
can you tell us:
- does it means that MorphTreeMorph was too slow?
- what was the reason of the change?
- any information that would make us understand the tradeoffs.
Stef
On Nov 13, 2009, at 2:47 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
Hi,
You might notice that in the rendering of MooseFinder is slightly
different. In particular, you will only get a limited amount of
items displayed in the group view.
This is due to a change in Glamour: we now use only the
MorphTreeMorph widget to render both lists and trees.
If you encounter issues, please report them.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev 
3:01 p.m.
On 13 nov. 2009, at 10:28, Tudor Girba wrote:
Any morph widget is too slow to display more than a
couple of
hundred elements. The MorphTreeMorph is no exception.
What's more, when you have more than a couple of hundred, you do not
really need to see them all, because you want to manipulate them via
a query.
The filter just hides the data, but you can still manipulate it. So,
you actually do not lose much. A better approach would be to have a
list that expands automatically once you get at the bottom of the
visible items.
Yes, certainly it's a better approach, because before running a query,
just browsing through the list can help you formulate the query.
I see there is like a tag 'there are hidden elements', is it possible
to make it behave like a button so that it expands the list (like the
next 50 items or the full list?)
Also the moose finder is fucked up :)
When I browse a group with only one item, I get the group, not the
item, so I cant browse individual entity anymore
The reason for moving to the MorphTreeMorph are the followings:
- by depending on one single morph widget, we reduce the maintenance
team
- it is actively developed and maintained, which is not a given in
the Morphic world
- it offers a proper tree behavior
Cheers,
Doru
On 13 Nov 2009, at 14:13, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
--
Simon
Hi doru
can you tell us:
- does it means that MorphTreeMorph was too slow?
- what was the reason of the change?
- any information that would make us understand the tradeoffs.
Stef
On Nov 13, 2009, at 2:47 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi,
You might notice that in the rendering of MooseFinder is slightly
different. In particular, you will only get a limited amount of
items displayed in the group view.
This is due to a change in Glamour: we now use only the
MorphTreeMorph widget to render both lists and trees.
If you encounter issues, please report them.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
3:10 p.m.
Hi Simon,
Did you try pressing it? :) At the moment it expands the whole list,
which is not too great. Furthermore, the label does not update yet.
But, these will change.
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Being happy is a matter of choice."
Any morph
widget is too slow to display more than a couple of
hundred elements. The MorphTreeMorph is no exception.
What's more, when you have more than a couple of hundred, you do
not really need to see them all, because you want to manipulate
them via a query.
The filter just hides the data, but you can still manipulate it.
So, you actually do not lose much. A better approach would be to
have a list that expands automatically once you get at the bottom
of the visible items.
Yes, certainly it's a better approach, because before running a
query, just browsing through the list can help you formulate the
query.
I see there is like a tag 'there are hidden elements', is it
possible to make it behave like a button so that it expands the list
(like the next 50 items or the full list?) Also the moose finder is fucked up :)
When I browse a group with only one item, I get the group, not the
item, so I cant browse individual entity anymore
Thanks. Fixed.
Cheers,
Doru
The reason for moving to the MorphTreeMorph are the followings:
- by depending on one single morph widget, we reduce the
maintenance team
- it is actively developed and maintained, which is not a given in
the Morphic world
- it offers a proper tree behavior
Cheers,
Doru
On 13 Nov 2009, at 14:13, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi doru
can you tell us:
- does it means that MorphTreeMorph was too slow?
- what was the reason of the change?
- any information that would make us understand the tradeoffs.
Stef
On Nov 13, 2009, at 2:47 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi,
You might notice that in the rendering of MooseFinder is slightly
different. In particular, you will only get a limited amount of
items displayed in the group view.
This is due to a change in Glamour: we now use only the
MorphTreeMorph widget to render both lists and trees.
If you encounter issues, please report them.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
3:59 p.m.
On 13 nov. 2009, at 11:10, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Being happy is a matter of choice."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon
Hi Simon,
Did you try pressing it? :) At the moment it expands the whole list,
which is not too great. Furthermore, the label does not update yet.
But, these will change.
Yes I tried, couldnt resist :)
However, didnt work at first glance, perhaps I missed something
Any morph
widget is too slow to display more than a couple of
hundred elements. The MorphTreeMorph is no exception.
What's more, when you have more than a couple of hundred, you do
not really need to see them all, because you want to manipulate
them via a query.
The filter just hides the data, but you can still manipulate it.
So, you actually do not lose much. A better approach would be to
have a list that expands automatically once you get at the bottom
of the visible items.
Yes, certainly it's a better approach, because before running a
query, just browsing through the list can help you formulate the
query.
I see there is like a tag 'there are hidden elements', is it
possible to make it behave like a button so that it expands the
list (like the next 50 items or the full list?) Also the moose finder is fucked up :)
When I browse a group with only one item, I get the group, not the
item, so I cant browse individual entity anymore
Thanks. Fixed.
Cheers,
Doru
The reason for moving to the MorphTreeMorph are the followings:
- by depending on one single morph widget, we reduce the
maintenance team
- it is actively developed and maintained, which is not a given in
the Morphic world
- it offers a proper tree behavior
Cheers,
Doru
On 13 Nov 2009, at 14:13, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi doru
can you tell us:
- does it means that MorphTreeMorph was too slow?
- what was the reason of the change?
- any information that would make us understand the tradeoffs.
Stef
On Nov 13, 2009, at 2:47 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You might notice that in the rendering of MooseFinder is
> slightly different. In particular, you will only get a limited
> amount of items displayed in the group view.
>
> This is due to a change in Glamour: we now use only the
> MorphTreeMorph widget to render both lists and trees.
>
> If you encounter issues, please report them.
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
14 Nov
14 Nov
2:15 a.m.
On Nov 13, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Any morph widget is too slow to display more than a
couple of hundred elements. The MorphTreeMorph is no exception.
may be you should propose to alain to have a smart one: only displaying its visible
elements?
What's more, when you have more than a couple of
hundred, you do not really need to see them all, because you want to manipulate them via a
query.
The filter just hides the data, but you can still manipulate it. So, you actually do not
lose much. A better approach would be to have a list that expands automatically once you
get at the bottom of the visible items.
did you discuss that with alain?
The reason for moving to the MorphTreeMorph are the
followings:
- by depending on one single morph widget, we reduce the maintenance team
- it is actively developed and maintained, which is not a given in the Morphic world
- it offers a proper tree behavior
Ok I thought you were already using it and changed.
Cheers,
Doru
On 13 Nov 2009, at 14:13, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi doru
can you tell us:
- does it means that MorphTreeMorph was too slow?
- what was the reason of the change?
- any information that would make us understand the tradeoffs.
Stef
On Nov 13, 2009, at 2:47 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi,
You might notice that in the rendering of MooseFinder is slightly different. In
particular, you will only get a limited amount of items displayed in the group view.
This is due to a change in Glamour: we now use only the MorphTreeMorph widget to render
both lists and trees.
If you encounter issues, please report them.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
15 Nov
15 Nov
2:14 a.m.
Hi Stef,
I am in contact with him, and this is on the to do list to discuss
with him.
We were using it, but only for the trees. Now, we are using it also
for single selection and multiple selection lists.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"One cannot do more than one can do."
Any morph
widget is too slow to display more than a couple of
hundred elements. The MorphTreeMorph is no exception.
may be you should propose to alain to have a smart one: only
displaying its visible elements?
What's more, when you have more than a couple
of hundred, you do
not really need to see them all, because you want to manipulate
them via a query.
The filter just hides the data, but you can still manipulate it.
So, you actually do not lose much. A better approach would be to
have a list that expands automatically once you get at the bottom
of the visible items.
did you discuss that with alain? The reason for
moving to the MorphTreeMorph are the followings:
- by depending on one single morph widget, we reduce the
maintenance team
- it is actively developed and maintained, which is not a given in
the Morphic world
- it offers a proper tree behavior
Ok I thought you were already using it and changed.
Cheers,
Doru
On 13 Nov 2009, at 14:13, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi doru
can you tell us:
- does it means that MorphTreeMorph was too slow?
- what was the reason of the change?
- any information that would make us understand the tradeoffs.
Stef
On Nov 13, 2009, at 2:47 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi,
You might notice that in the rendering of MooseFinder is slightly
different. In particular, you will only get a limited amount of
items displayed in the group view.
This is due to a change in Glamour: we now use only the
MorphTreeMorph widget to render both lists and trees.
If you encounter issues, please report them.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
5516
days inactive
5518
days old
7 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Simon Denier -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba