Hi,
I would like to apply filter only on the root items in a tree presentation and not on all children. Computing children take a bit of time for each node, which is acceptable for each root. However, accumulated computation time make the filtering un-usable.
I could not find a possible way to avoid the filter computation for the children in GLMTreeMorphNodeModel>>shouldBeDisplayedByText with the current implementation. I can propose a fix.
Let me know what you think.
regards. usman
Here is a working version if someone's interested. I would like to commit on a bug fix branch for Moose 5.0 (may be with a specific postfix) and not in the main branch to have it in Moose 5.0.
regards.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to apply filter only on the root items in a tree presentation and not on all children. Computing children take a bit of time for each node, which is acceptable for each root. However, accumulated computation time make the filtering un-usable.
I could not find a possible way to avoid the filter computation for the children in GLMTreeMorphNodeModel>>shouldBeDisplayedByText with the current implementation. I can propose a fix.
Let me know what you think.
regards. usman
Example:
| finder | finder := GLMFinder new. finder show: [:a | a list title: 'List'; beMultiple; filterOn: [:text :each | each asString = text ]; helpMessage: 'Enter a filtering request (e.g., "each > $f")'. a tree title: 'Tree'; filterOn: [:text :each | each asString = text ]; filterRootsOnly: true; children: [:item :all :level | level < 2 ifTrue: [#(a b)] ifFalse: [#()]]]. finder openOn: ($a to: $z)
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a working version if someone's interested. I would like to commit on a bug fix branch for Moose 5.0 (may be with a specific postfix) and not in the main branch to have it in Moose 5.0.
regards.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to apply filter only on the root items in a tree presentation and not on all children. Computing children take a bit of time for each node, which is acceptable for each root. However, accumulated computation time make the filtering un-usable.
I could not find a possible way to avoid the filter computation for the children in GLMTreeMorphNodeModel>>shouldBeDisplayedByText with the current implementation. I can propose a fix.
Let me know what you think.
regards. usman
Hi,
We do not have a branch for Moose 5.0. For Moose, we only have one repository.
And Moose 5.1 will be released soon after Pharo.
Cheers, Doru
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a working version if someone's interested. I would like to commit on a bug fix branch for Moose 5.0 (may be with a specific postfix) and not in the main branch to have it in Moose 5.0.
regards.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to apply filter only on the root items in a tree presentation and not on all children. Computing children take a bit of time for each node, which is acceptable for each root. However, accumulated computation time make the filtering un-usable.
I could not find a possible way to avoid the filter computation for the children in GLMTreeMorphNodeModel>>shouldBeDisplayedByText with the current implementation. I can propose a fix.
Let me know what you think.
regards. usman
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Ok then I'll keep it in another repo temporarily and commit on the main branch when we move to 5.1.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com wrote:
Hi,
We do not have a branch for Moose 5.0. For Moose, we only have one repository.
And Moose 5.1 will be released soon after Pharo.
Cheers, Doru
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a working version if someone's interested. I would like to commit on a bug fix branch for Moose 5.0 (may be with a specific postfix) and not in the main branch to have it in Moose 5.0.
regards.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to apply filter only on the root items in a tree presentation and not on all children. Computing children take a bit of time for each node, which is acceptable for each root. However, accumulated computation time make the filtering un-usable.
I could not find a possible way to avoid the filter computation for the children in GLMTreeMorphNodeModel>>shouldBeDisplayedByText with the current implementation. I can propose a fix.
Let me know what you think.
regards. usman
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Damien Cassou once instructed me on branching in Monticello: ---
it is just a question of naming your commit that opens a new branch:
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/PharoForTheEnterprise/lastSuccess...
---
but the link seems to be down
so here it goes If you have a package Famix-Core
then you commit your change has Famix-Core.MyBranch
It generates a mcz with a name looking like: Famix-Core.MyBranch-UsmanBhathi.532 which parent will be Famix-Core-UsmanBhathi.531
I used it a couple of times and it works fine.
nicolas
On 11/03/2015 09:13, Usman Bhatti wrote:
Ok then I'll keep it in another repo temporarily and commit on the main branch when we move to 5.1.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com mailto:tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi, We do not have a branch for Moose 5.0. For Moose, we only have one repository. And Moose 5.1 will be released soon after Pharo. Cheers, Doru On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti@gmail.com <mailto:usman.bhatti@gmail.com>> wrote: Here is a working version if someone's interested. I would like to commit on a bug fix branch for Moose 5.0 (may be with a specific postfix) and not in the main branch to have it in Moose 5.0. regards. On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti@gmail.com <mailto:usman.bhatti@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi, I would like to apply filter only on the root items in a tree presentation and not on all children. Computing children take a bit of time for each node, which is acceptable for each root. However, accumulated computation time make the filtering un-usable. I could not find a possible way to avoid the filter computation for the children in GLMTreeMorphNodeModel>>shouldBeDisplayedByText with the current implementation. I can propose a fix. Let me know what you think. regards. usman _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch <mailto:Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com> "Every thing has its own flow" _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch <mailto:Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Sure. Saving the Monticello version is not an issue. The main problem is that you would also have to manage the configuration, and this will be a manual and error-prone process.
Cheers, Doru
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Nicolas Anquetil <nicolas.anquetil@inria.fr
wrote:
Damien Cassou once instructed me on branching in Monticello:
it is just a question of naming your commit that opens a new branch: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/PharoForTheEnterprise/lastSuccess...
but the link seems to be down
so here it goes If you have a package Famix-Core
then you commit your change has Famix-Core.MyBranch
It generates a mcz with a name looking like: Famix-Core.MyBranch-UsmanBhathi.532 which parent will be Famix-Core-UsmanBhathi.531
I used it a couple of times and it works fine.
nicolas
On 11/03/2015 09:13, Usman Bhatti wrote:
Ok then I'll keep it in another repo temporarily and commit on the main branch when we move to 5.1.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com wrote:
Hi,
We do not have a branch for Moose 5.0. For Moose, we only have one repository.
And Moose 5.1 will be released soon after Pharo.
Cheers, Doru
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a working version if someone's interested. I would like to commit on a bug fix branch for Moose 5.0 (may be with a specific postfix) and not in the main branch to have it in Moose 5.0.
regards.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to apply filter only on the root items in a tree presentation and not on all children. Computing children take a bit of time for each node, which is acceptable for each root. However, accumulated computation time make the filtering un-usable.
I could not find a possible way to avoid the filter computation for the children in GLMTreeMorphNodeModel>>shouldBeDisplayedByText with the current implementation. I can propose a fix.
Let me know what you think.
regards. usman
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing listMoose-dev@iam.unibe.chhttps://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-
Nicolas Anquetil -
Tudor Girba -
Usman Bhatti