Sure. Saving the Monticello version is not an issue. The main problem is
that you would also have to manage the configuration, and this will be a
manual and error-prone process.
Cheers,
Doru
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Nicolas Anquetil <nicolas.anquetil(a)inria.fr
wrote:
>
> Damien Cassou once instructed me on branching in Monticello:
> ---
>
> it is just a question of naming your commit that opens a new branch:
>
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/PharoForTheEnterprise/lastSucces…
>
> ---
>
> but the link seems to be down
>
> so here it goes
> If you have a package Famix-Core
>
> then you commit your change has Famix-Core.MyBranch
>
> It generates a mcz with a name looking like:
> Famix-Core.MyBranch-UsmanBhathi.532
> which parent will be
> Famix-Core-UsmanBhathi.531
>
>
> I used it a couple of times and it works fine.
>
> nicolas
>
>
>
>
> On 11/03/2015 09:13, Usman Bhatti wrote:
>
> Ok then I'll keep it in another repo temporarily and commit on the main
> branch when we move to 5.1.
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com
wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We do not have a branch for Moose 5.0. For Moose, we only have one
>> repository.
>>
>> And Moose 5.1 will be released soon after Pharo.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com>
>
wrote:
>>
>>> Here is a working version if someone's interested.
>>> I would like to commit on a bug fix branch for Moose 5.0 (may be with a
>>> specific postfix) and not in the main branch to have it in Moose 5.0.
>>>
>>>
>>> regards.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com>
>>
wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to apply filter only on the root items in a tree
>>>> presentation and not on all children. Computing children take a bit of
time
>>>> for each node, which is acceptable for each root. However, accumulated
>>>> computation time make the filtering un-usable.
>>>>
>>>> I could not find a possible way to avoid the filter computation for
>>>> the children in GLMTreeMorphNodeModel>>shouldBeDisplayedByText with
the
>>>> current implementation. I can propose a fix.
>>>>
>>>> Let me know what you think.
>>>>
>>>> regards.
>>>> usman
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> "Every thing has its own flow"
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing
listMoose-dev@iam.unibe.chhttps://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"