it is just a question of naming your commit that opens a new branch: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/PharoForTheEnterprise/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/Conventions/Conventions.pier.html---
Ok then I'll keep it in another repo temporarily and commit on the main branch when we move to 5.1.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
We do not have a branch for Moose 5.0. For Moose, we only have one repository.
And Moose 5.1 will be released soon after Pharo.
Cheers,Doru
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti@gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________Here is a working version if someone's interested.I would like to commit on a bug fix branch for Moose 5.0 (may be with a specific postfix) and not in the main branch to have it in Moose 5.0.
regards.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I would like to apply filter only on the root items in a tree presentation and not on all children. Computing children take a bit of time for each node, which is acceptable for each root. However, accumulated computation time make the filtering un-usable.
I could not find a possible way to avoid the filter computation for the children in GLMTreeMorphNodeModel>>shouldBeDisplayedByText with the current implementation. I can propose a fix.
Let me know what you think.
regards.usman
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev