Thank you, Alex.
Doru
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Alexandre Bergel
<alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>wrote;wrote:
I am quasi exclusively using the Moose image, which
includes GTDebugger
and GTInspector.
These are two great tools. I use the standard Pharo 3.0 for particular
needs only. When I do this, it is like using Nautilus and coming back to OB
(or even the old standard browser).
GTDebugger and GTInspector are great. I like them.
Alexandre
On Dec 30, 2013, at 2:24 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
Some of you asked how the GTInspector and GTDebugger are different from
the
existing infrastructure. They are quite different from the norm in
that: they are tiny, and they are highly extensible. Here are some posts
that describe what makes them different:
http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/the-moldable-gtinspector-deconstructe…
http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/extending-variables-shown-in-gtinspec…
http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/moldable-gtdebugger
These tools are already the default development tools in the Moose
image. As you
can see, Moose is reshaping the Pharo IDE. I think this is
exciting.
This should be just the beginning. To make it better, we need your
energy:
- Apply and extend these tools for your context
(this is what makes them
unique).
- Tell us what works and what does not work.
- Ideally, start working with us on this topic. In particular, I am
looking for
people that would like to spend some time working on Morphic
widgets.
It's your turn now.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.