Status: New Owner: tudor.gi...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Famix Milestone-4.6
New issue 710 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: Move FAMIXAnnotation* entities to Famix-Core http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=710
Annotations are now used for Smalltalk as well, so they belong to the Core of Famix.
Comment #1 on issue 710 by fabrizio...@gmail.com: Move FAMIXAnnotation* entities to Famix-Core http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=710
With annotation in Smalltalk you mean pragmas? If yes, wouldn't be better to add FAMIXPragmas* classes in FAMIX-Smalltalk that inherit from the FAMIXAnnotation* classes? (I agree to move FAMIXAnnotation* classes in FAMIX-Core)
Comment #2 on issue 710 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: Move FAMIXAnnotation* entities to Famix-Core http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=710
No. The core of Famix is language independent. So, by definition, there will be some generalization in terms. Furthermore, FAMIXAnnotation is a perfectly understandable term in Smalltalk.
Updates: Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 710 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: Move FAMIXAnnotation* entities to Famix-Core http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=710
Fixed.
-
moose-technology＠googlecode.com