23 Sep
2011
23 Sep
'11
3:21 p.m.
Status: New
Owner: tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Famix Milestone-4.6
New issue 710 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Move FAMIXAnnotation* entities to
Famix-Core
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=710
Annotations are now used for Smalltalk as well, so they belong to the Core
of Famix.
24 Sep
24 Sep
11:17 a.m.
New subject: Issue 710 in moose-technology: Move FAMIXAnnotation* entities to Famix-Core
Comment #1 on issue 710 by fabrizio...(a)gmail.com: Move FAMIXAnnotation*
entities to Famix-Core
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=710
With annotation in Smalltalk you mean pragmas? If yes, wouldn't be better
to add FAMIXPragmas* classes in FAMIX-Smalltalk that inherit from the
FAMIXAnnotation* classes?
(I agree to move FAMIXAnnotation* classes in FAMIX-Core)
12:36 p.m.
New subject: Issue 710 in moose-technology: Move FAMIXAnnotation* entities to Famix-Core
Comment #2 on issue 710 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Move FAMIXAnnotation*
entities to Famix-Core
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=710
No. The core of Famix is language independent. So, by definition, there
will be some generalization in terms. Furthermore, FAMIXAnnotation is a
perfectly understandable term in Smalltalk.
12:49 p.m.
New subject: Issue 710 in moose-technology: Move FAMIXAnnotation* entities to Famix-Core
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 710 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Move FAMIXAnnotation*
entities to Famix-Core
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=710
Fixed.
4838
days inactive
4839
days old
3 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
moose-technology＠googlecode.com