Hi!
MooseGroup has #sorted: and #sort:
What about keeping just one?
Especially since MooseGroup>>sort: aBlock self sorted: aBlock
Cheers, Alexandre
Hi Alex,
This is there for compatibility reasons with older Pharo Collection implementations (there was a large debate a version or so ago). Now, we can rely on sorted: nicely, so we can remove sort:.
Cheers, Doru
On 15 Mar 2011, at 21:10, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi!
MooseGroup has #sorted: and #sort:
What about keeping just one?
Especially since MooseGroup>>sort: aBlock self sorted: aBlock
Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Yesterday is a fact. Tomorrow is a possibility. Today is a challenge."
Done. In Moose-Core-AlexandreBergel.318 and Moose-Tests-Core-AlexandreBergel.24
Alexandre
On 16 Mar 2011, at 02:42, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Alex,
This is there for compatibility reasons with older Pharo Collection implementations (there was a large debate a version or so ago). Now, we can rely on sorted: nicely, so we can remove sort:.
Cheers, Doru
On 15 Mar 2011, at 21:10, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi!
MooseGroup has #sorted: and #sort:
What about keeping just one?
Especially since MooseGroup>>sort: aBlock self sorted: aBlock
Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Yesterday is a fact. Tomorrow is a possibility. Today is a challenge."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Tudor Girba