Hi Stef, Could you provide just one example of such a filter?

Cheers, Doru On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:17 PM, stephane ducasse wrote: > Hi doru > > with azadeh we would to use group to represent the intermediate > result of applying a filter > on a model. Now the problem I have is that I cannot query a group as > model (may be I'm wrong). > Apparently a group a class does not understand allClasses. > > Is there a way that we can define/or get the behavior of a model on a > group? > > Stef > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog "We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Hi Stef, I took a look at AzadehExtraction, and in all the ExtractionRules that are implemented you take the model as an input, but in the same time you know in each predicate what is the exact type of entities that you actually look for, and in the end you only return entities of the same type. For example, name matching looks like: NameMatchingExtraction new matchingName: '*LAN*'; matchClasses; extract: model. This returns a ClassGroup. But could this not look like this: NameMatchingExtraction new matchingName: '*LAN*'; extract: model allClasses. ?

But perhaps you have further intentions with this package and this is just the beginning. I am still looking for the use case for heterogeneous groups :).

Also take a look at the ConformityStrategy hierarchy, because it is very similar in intent with AzadehExtraction.

Doru On Dec 3, 2007, at 12:37 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > > On 2 déc. 07, at 10:33, Tudor Girba wrote: > >> Hi Stef, >> >> Could you provide just one example of such a filter? > > > It is in AzadehExtraction > From memory: > > NameMatcher new > classes; > match: '*LAN*' > > > but this could be > > NameMatcher new > methods; > match: '*foo' > > > and the implementation is > classes > kindSelectors := #allClasses > > methods > kindSelectors := #allMethods > > Stef > > >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:17 PM, stephane ducasse wrote: >> >>> Hi doru >>> >>> with azadeh we would to use group to represent the intermediate >>> result of applying a filter >>> on a model. Now the problem I have is that I cannot query a >>> group as >>> model (may be I'm wrong). >>> Apparently a group a class does not understand allClasses. >>> >>> Is there a way that we can define/or get the behavior of a model >>> on a >>> group? >>> >>> Stef >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> www.tudorgirba.com/blog >> >> "We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go." >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > -- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog "In a world where everything is moving ever faster, one might have better chances to win by moving slower." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev