30 Nov
2007
30 Nov
'07
2:17 p.m.
Hi doru
with azadeh we would to use group to represent the intermediate
result of applying a filter
on a model. Now the problem I have is that I cannot query a group as
model (may be I'm wrong).
Apparently a group a class does not understand allClasses.
Is there a way that we can define/or get the behavior of a model on a
group?
Stef
2 Dec
2 Dec
10:33 a.m.
Hi Stef,
Could you provide just one example of such a filter?
Cheers,
Doru
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:17 PM, stephane ducasse wrote:
Hi doru
with azadeh we would to use group to represent the intermediate
result of applying a filter
on a model. Now the problem I have is that I cannot query a group as
model (may be I'm wrong).
Apparently a group a class does not understand allClasses.
Is there a way that we can define/or get the behavior of a model on a
group?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go."
3 Dec
3 Dec
12:37 p.m.
On 2 déc. 07, at 10:33, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Stef,
Could you provide just one example of such a filter?
It is in AzadehExtraction
From memory:
NameMatcher new
classes;
match: '*LAN*'
but this could be
NameMatcher new
methods;
match: '*foo'
and the implementation is
classes
kindSelectors := #allClasses
methods
kindSelectors := #allMethods
Stef
Cheers,
Doru
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:17 PM, stephane ducasse wrote:
Hi doru
with azadeh we would to use group to represent the intermediate
result of applying a filter
on a model. Now the problem I have is that I cannot query a group as
model (may be I'm wrong).
Apparently a group a class does not understand allClasses.
Is there a way that we can define/or get the behavior of a model on a
group?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
11:29 p.m.
Hi Stef,
I took a look at AzadehExtraction, and in all the ExtractionRules that
are implemented you take the model as an input, but in the same time
you know in each predicate what is the exact type of entities that you
actually look for, and in the end you only return entities of the same
type.
For example, name matching looks like:
NameMatchingExtraction new
matchingName: '*LAN*';
matchClasses;
extract: model.
This returns a ClassGroup.
But could this not look like this:
NameMatchingExtraction new
matchingName: '*LAN*';
extract: model allClasses.
?
But perhaps you have further intentions with this package and this is
just the beginning. I am still looking for the use case for
heterogeneous groups :).
Also take a look at the ConformityStrategy hierarchy, because it is
very similar in intent with AzadehExtraction.
Doru
On Dec 3, 2007, at 12:37 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
On 2 déc. 07, at 10:33, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"In a world where everything is moving ever faster,
one might have better chances to win by moving slower."
Hi Stef,
Could you provide just one example of such a filter?
It is in AzadehExtraction
From memory:
NameMatcher new
classes;
match: '*LAN*'
but this could be
NameMatcher new
methods;
match: '*foo'
and the implementation is
classes
kindSelectors := #allClasses
methods
kindSelectors := #allMethods
Stef
Cheers,
Doru
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:17 PM, stephane ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Hi doru
with azadeh we would to use group to represent the intermediate
result of applying a filter
on a model. Now the problem I have is that I cannot query a group as
model (may be I'm wrong).
Apparently a group a class does not understand allClasses.
Is there a way that we can define/or get the behavior of a model
on a
group?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
4 Dec
4 Dec
8:17 a.m.
On 3 déc. 07, at 23:29, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Stef,
I took a look at AzadehExtraction, and in all the ExtractionRules that
are implemented you take the model as an input, but in the same time
you know in each predicate what is the exact type of entities that you
actually look for, and in the end you only return entities of the same
type.
For example, name matching looks like:
NameMatchingExtraction new
matchingName: '*LAN*';
matchClasses;
extract: model.
This returns a ClassGroup.
But could this not look like this:
NameMatchingExtraction new
matchingName: '*LAN*';
extract: model allClasses.
?
but doru the problem is that I cannot compose fully encapsulated
queries.
Of cours I can do what you are saying but first I only wanted as
input the group/model
But perhaps you have further intentions with this
package and this is
just the beginning. I am still looking for the use case for
heterogeneous groups :).
I do not want really hetero groups, I want polymorphic group/model
Also take a look at the ConformityStrategy hierarchy,
because it is
very similar in intent with AzadehExtraction.
Azadeh can you have a look?
Doru
On Dec 3, 2007, at 12:37 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
On 2 déc. 07, at 10:33, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"In a world where everything is moving ever faster,
one might have better chances to win by moving slower."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Hi Stef,
Could you provide just one example of such a filter?
It is in AzadehExtraction
From memory:
NameMatcher new
classes;
match: '*LAN*'
but this could be
NameMatcher new
methods;
match: '*foo'
and the implementation is
classes
kindSelectors := #allClasses
methods
kindSelectors := #allMethods
Stef
Cheers,
Doru
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:17 PM, stephane ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Hi doru
with azadeh we would to use group to represent the intermediate
result of applying a filter
on a model. Now the problem I have is that I cannot query a
group as
model (may be I'm wrong).
Apparently a group a class does not understand allClasses.
Is there a way that we can define/or get the behavior of a model
on a
group?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
6000
days inactive
6004
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
stephane ducasse -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba