20 Sep
2010
20 Sep
'10
4:43 p.m.
I just tried to load Moose on pharo1.2
I only do this script (loading OB is not needed I think):
=====
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'rb';
package: 'AST-Core';
package: 'Refactoring-Core';
package: 'Refactoring-Critics';
package: 'Refactoring-Environment';
package: 'Refactoring-Spelling';
package: 'Refactoring-Changes';
load.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'shout';
version: 'Shout-cyrille_delaunay.87';
package: 'ShoutWorkspace.1';
package: 'ShoutTests';
load.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository';
package: 'ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser';
load.
((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser) project version: '1.1.5') load.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'Moose';
package: 'ConfigurationOfMoose';
load.
(Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfMoose) perform: #loadDefault.
=====
With Cyrille, we fix a part of error tests. Now, I'm not sure that it can work on
Pharo1.1.
So we do not save our work on moose repository.
What do we do for next steps ?
Do we change our Pharo system and go to 1.2 or working on 1.1 ?
Cheers,
---
Jannik Laval
20 Sep
20 Sep
4:50 p.m.
We have to make sure that Pharo 1.2 is working well. Yesterday, I couldn't inspect a
value from the debugger because of an error raised with some mapping with closure. This is
annoying.
Alexandre
On 20 Sep 2010, at 10:43, Laval Jannik wrote:
I just tried to load Moose on pharo1.2
I only do this script (loading OB is not needed I think):
=====
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'rb';
package: 'AST-Core';
package: 'Refactoring-Core';
package: 'Refactoring-Critics';
package: 'Refactoring-Environment';
package: 'Refactoring-Spelling';
package: 'Refactoring-Changes';
load.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'shout';
version: 'Shout-cyrille_delaunay.87';
package: 'ShoutWorkspace.1';
package: 'ShoutTests';
load.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository';
package: 'ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser';
load.
((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser) project version: '1.1.5') load.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'Moose';
package: 'ConfigurationOfMoose';
load.
(Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfMoose) perform: #loadDefault.
=====
With Cyrille, we fix a part of error tests. Now, I'm not sure that it can work on
Pharo1.1.
So we do not save our work on moose repository.
What do we do for next steps ?
Do we change our Pharo system and go to 1.2 or working on 1.1 ?
Cheers,
---
Jannik Laval
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
22 Sep
22 Sep
3:20 p.m.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre(a)bergel.eu>wrote;wrote:
We have to make sure that Pharo 1.2 is working well.
Yesterday, I couldn't
inspect a value from the debugger because of an error raised with some
mapping with closure. This is annoying.
But 1.2 CAN be annoying. And it CAN be even unstable. That's why its label
says "unstable".
You cannot make progress without breaking things.
I see you guys (Moose) doing a lot of effort for Pharo 1.2....why you need
so much that ? Maybe you should wait a little until Pharo 1.2 gets code
freeze and releases a first beta or RC.
Cheers
Mariano
Alexandre
On 20 Sep 2010, at 10:43, Laval Jannik wrote:
I just tried to load Moose on pharo1.2
I only do this script (loading OB is not needed I think):
=====
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'rb';
package: 'AST-Core';
package: 'Refactoring-Core';
package: 'Refactoring-Critics';
package: 'Refactoring-Environment';
package: 'Refactoring-Spelling';
package: 'Refactoring-Changes';
load.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'shout';
version: 'Shout-cyrille_delaunay.87';
package: 'ShoutWorkspace.1';
package: 'ShoutTests';
load.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository';
package: 'ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser';
load.
((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser) project version: '1.1.5')
load.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'Moose';
package: 'ConfigurationOfMoose';
load.
(Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfMoose) perform: #loadDefault.
=====
With Cyrille, we fix a part of error tests. Now, I'm not sure that it can
work
on Pharo1.1.
So we do not save our work on moose repository.
What do we do for next steps ?
Do we change our Pharo system and go to 1.2 or working on 1.1 ?
Cheers,
---
Jannik Laval
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
20 Sep
20 Sep
5:14 p.m.
Hi guys,
It is not so easy to load Moose on Pharo1.2 :)
There are two deprecated call during the loading. This is due to FileSystem, we cannot
change the source code on the repository.
====
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'rb';
package: 'AST-Core';
package: 'Refactoring-Core';
package: 'Refactoring-Critics';
package: 'Refactoring-Environment';
package: 'Refactoring-Spelling';
package: 'Refactoring-Changes';
load.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'shout';
version: 'Shout-cyrille_delaunay.87';
package: 'ShoutWorkspace.1';
package: 'ShoutTests';
load.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository';
package: 'ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser';
load.
(ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser project version: '1.1-baseline') load.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'Moose';
package: 'ConfigurationOfMoose';
load.
(Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfMoose) perform: #loadDefault.
====
For now our fixes are on files attached to the mail.
Cheers,
Jannik
On Sep 20, 2010, at 16:43 , Laval Jannik wrote:
I just tried to load Moose on pharo1.2
I only do this script (loading OB is not needed I think):
=====
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'rb';
package: 'AST-Core';
package: 'Refactoring-Core';
package: 'Refactoring-Critics';
package: 'Refactoring-Environment';
package: 'Refactoring-Spelling';
package: 'Refactoring-Changes';
load.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'shout';
version: 'Shout-cyrille_delaunay.87';
package: 'ShoutWorkspace.1';
package: 'ShoutTests';
load.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository';
package: 'ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser';
load.
((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser) project version: '1.1.5') load.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'Moose';
package: 'ConfigurationOfMoose';
load.
(Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfMoose) perform: #loadDefault.
=====
With Cyrille, we fix a part of error tests. Now, I'm not sure that it can work on
Pharo1.1.
So we do not save our work on moose repository.
What do we do for next steps ?
Do we change our Pharo system and go to 1.2 or working on 1.1 ?
Cheers,
---
Jannik Laval
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
---
Jannik Laval
6:52 p.m.
On 20 sept. 2010, at 17:14, Laval Jannik wrote:
Hi guys,
It is not so easy to load Moose on Pharo1.2 :)
There are two deprecated call during the loading. This is due to FileSystem, we cannot
change the source code on the repository.
What's the licence? Can we copy the package in Moose repo until fixes are integrated?
====
For now our fixes are on files attached to the mail.
Cheers,
Jannik
<Mondrian-jl.581.mcz><Moose-MonticelloImporter-jl.12.mcz><ShoutWorkspace.1-jl.7.mcz><Glamour-Morphic-Renderer-jl.6.mcz>
Do the fixes break in Pharo 1.1? Could we integrate them and still run in 1.1?
On Sep 20, 2010, at 16:43 , Laval Jannik wrote:
> =====
>
> With Cyrille, we fix a part of error tests. Now, I'm not sure that it can work on
Pharo1.1.
> So we do not save our work on moose repository.
>
> What do we do for next steps ?
> Do we change our Pharo system and go to 1.2 or working on 1.1 ?
Check the status of 1.2 dev. If there is a good enough stable version, we can move. Until
that, I would prefer to stay with 1.1 right now, just to enjoy a nice stable fast
environment for a while, and also so that we can still integrate fixes in 1.1, benefiting
to the users who can't/won't move to 1.2 right now.
Actually the best plan is to check whether we could maintain the compability for a while.
--
Simon
21 Sep
21 Sep
9:43 p.m.
On Sep 20, 2010, at 18:52 , Simon Denier wrote:
Only Mondrian seems to be broken with my changes.
So tomorrow, I will commit the rest.
Cheers,
Jannik
---
Jannik Laval
On 20 sept. 2010, at 17:14, Laval Jannik wrote:
I don't know, it is on wiresong.
Hi guys,
It is not so easy to load Moose on Pharo1.2 :)
There are two deprecated call during the loading. This is due to FileSystem, we cannot
change the source code on the repository.
What's the licence? Can we copy the package in Moose repo until fixes are integrated?
====
For now our fixes are on files attached to the mail.
Cheers,
Jannik
<Mondrian-jl.581.mcz><Moose-MonticelloImporter-jl.12.mcz><ShoutWorkspace.1-jl.7.mcz><Glamour-Morphic-Renderer-jl.6.mcz>
Do the fixes break in Pharo 1.1? Could we integrate them and still run in 1.1?
On Sep 20, 2010, at 16:43 , Laval Jannik wrote:
> =====
>
> With Cyrille, we fix a part of error tests. Now, I'm not sure that it can work on
Pharo1.1.
> So we do not save our work on moose repository.
>
> What do we do for next steps ?
> Do we change our Pharo system and go to 1.2 or working on 1.1 ?
Check the status of 1.2 dev. If there is a good enough stable version, we can move. Until
that, I would prefer to stay with 1.1 right now, just to enjoy a nice stable fast
environment for a while, and also so that we can still integrate fixes in 1.1, benefiting
to the users who can't/won't move to 1.2 right now.
Actually the best plan is to check whether we could maintain the compability for a while.
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
10:07 p.m.
Only Mondrian seems to be broken with my changes.
So tomorrow, I will commit the rest.
Can you be a bit more explicit ? Try to commit what you have, I will have a look at it.
Alexandre
On Sep 20, 2010, at 16:43 , Laval Jannik wrote:
> =====
>
> With Cyrille, we fix a part of error tests. Now, I'm not sure that it can work on
Pharo1.1.
> So we do not save our work on moose repository.
>
> What do we do for next steps ?
> Do we change our Pharo system and go to 1.2 or working on 1.1 ?
Check the status of 1.2 dev. If there is a good enough stable version, we can move. Until
that, I would prefer to stay with 1.1 right now, just to enjoy a nice stable fast
environment for a while, and also so that we can still integrate fixes in 1.1, benefiting
to the users who can't/won't move to 1.2 right now.
Actually the best plan is to check whether we could maintain the compability for a while.
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
22 Sep
22 Sep
3:23 p.m.
On Sep 21, 2010, at 22:07 , Alexandre Bergel wrote:
All are on my first mail, you just have to merge.
The problem comes from ShoutWorkspace. The Preference changes are not integrated in Pharo
1.1
As I see, we should wait before going to pharo1.2
Cheers,
Jannik
Only Mondrian
seems to be broken with my changes.
So tomorrow, I will commit the rest.
Can you be a bit more explicit ? Try to commit what you have, I will have a look at it.
Alexandre
---
Jannik Laval
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
---
Jannik Laval
On Sep 20, 2010, at 16:43 , Laval Jannik wrote:
> =====
>
> With Cyrille, we fix a part of error tests. Now, I'm not sure that it can work on
Pharo1.1.
> So we do not save our work on moose repository.
>
> What do we do for next steps ?
> Do we change our Pharo system and go to 1.2 or working on 1.1 ?
Check the status of 1.2 dev. If there is a good enough stable version, we can move. Until
that, I would prefer to stay with 1.1 right now, just to enjoy a nice stable fast
environment for a while, and also so that we can still integrate fixes in 1.1, benefiting
to the users who can't/won't move to 1.2 right now.
Actually the best plan is to check whether we could maintain the compability for a while.
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
5427
days inactive
5429
days old
7 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Laval Jannik -
Laval Jannik -
Mariano Martinez Peck -
Simon Denier