:)

On Jul 23, 2011, at 9:37 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:

I added a comment in FAMIXType>>namespaceScope

"we ask the container for the namespaceScope because we can have classes in methods or in other classes. Thus, we need to traverse recursively until we reach a namespace"

Cheers, Doru

On 23 Jul 2011, at 20:56, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

...

doru could you add a nice comment explaining that in the method because for me the fact that a method is a container looks strange and I will never think about it.

Setf On Jul 23, 2011, at 6:50 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:

...

Hi,

Currently we have:

FAMIXType>>namespaceScope ^ self container

However, the problem is that we now can have classes and methods as containers. So, I now reimplemented it like:

FAMIXType>>namespaceScope ^ self container ifNotNil: [ self container namespaceScope ]

In the process I also fixed to use namespaceScope instead of container:

FAMIXMethod>>namespaceScope ^ self parentType namespaceScope

Please let me know if this introduces unwanted effects in your context.

Cheers, Doru

-- www.tudorgirba.com

"What we can governs what we wish."

---

Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

---

Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- www.tudorgirba.com

"If you interrupt the barber while he is cutting your hair, you will end up with a messy haircut."

---

Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev