Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 647 by cy.delau...@gmail.com: Integrate torch package visualization http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=647
Maybe it would be a good idea (?) to use / integrate the torch packages visualization in moose ? http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/53/15/08/PDF/Uqui10a-Torch-WCRE10.pd...
Comment #1 on issue 647 by stephane...@gmail.com: Integrate torch package visualization http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=647
This is not may be. And the action is to contact veronica to get her package oriented visualization (wiothut the changes part).
Hi,
Congratulations for the paper!
Also the site looks nice. I was just surprised to see that there is no reference to Moose (Glamour & Mondrian) or even Pharo anywhere. Not that it is mandatory, but it can be helpful :).
Cheers, Doru
On 10 Jun 2011, at 09:06, moose-technology@googlecode.com wrote:
Comment #1 on issue 647 by stephane...@gmail.com: Integrate torch package visualization http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=647
This is not may be. And the action is to contact veronica to get her package oriented visualization (wiothut the changes part).
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
Comment #2 on issue 647 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: Integrate torch package visualization http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=647
Is anyone interested in picking this up? If no, I will close it.
Updates: Status: WontFix
Comment #3 on issue 647 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: Integrate torch package visualization http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=647
Unfortunately, nobody picked this up.