The rest api is not integrated because it is/was too crude. Doru Sent from my iPhone On Apr 4, 2014, at 11:00, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:

Of course I did. Doru On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Pharo4Stef <pharo4Stef(a)free.fr> wrote: -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Which is the package? Doru On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>wrote;wrote: -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Stéphane Ducasse &lt;stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr Hello Stef, 1) You are referring Moose-DistributionMap-AndreHora.52. I don't understand why it was not integrated in your image. For example, I committed Moose-DistributionMap-AndreHora.53 and (as the package DistributionMap is in the config) the change is already integrated in last Moose image [1] as Doru said. 2) You said that the change "Compiler evaluate: -> Smalltalk evaluate:" is wrong. Ok, I can do the rollback. But it was mined from Pharo 2.0 -> 3.0, and currently in Pharo there are many Smalltalk evaluate: Let me know which one is correct, or maybe it depends of the context? [1] https://ci.inria.fr/moose/view/Moose%205.0/job/moose-5.0/lastSuccessfulBuil… > > Which is the package? > > Doru > > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Stéphane Ducasse < > stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> >> >> On 04 Apr 2014, at 11:00, Tudor Girba &lt;tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>> >> > Just commit. If the package is in the config it will get loaded in the >> next build. In Moose, we used an optimistic strategy until now. >> >> >> So I do not get why the package version that andre published was not >> loaded (and his changes looked to me wrong). >> >> > >> > Doru >> > >> > Sent from my iPhone >> > >> > On Apr 4, 2014, at 9:55, Pharo4Stef &lt;pharo4Stef(a)free.fr>> > >> >> Hi >> >> >> >> what is the process to get changes integrated into moose? >> >> We fixed two problems in DM and knonkrator and I do not know >> >> what is the process for their integration. >> >> >> >> Then is the rest API integrated into Moose? >> >> >> >> Stef >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Moose-dev mailing list >> >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Moose-dev mailing list >> > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow" > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- Andre Hora

I agree with that :) Doru On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Stéphane Ducasse &lt;stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr&gt;wrote;wrote: -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

I did reply :). It was not integrated because it was (I do not know the current status because nobody promotes it anymore) too crude at that time. Doru On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Pharo4Stef &lt;pharo4Stef(a)free.fr&gt; wrote: -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Hi, I think the thing should be the other way around. You announced an alpha a long time ago including a web ui prototype. Me and others took a look at it, and there was some discussion on the mailing list. And then silence. It's hard to keep track of what is going on without proactive communication. I would suggest that you provide everyone with an overview of what exists and then we go from there. Doru On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Usman Bhatti &lt;usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"