Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Famix Milestone-4.4
New issue 584 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: AnnotationType should be a FAMIX Type http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=584
AnnotationType should be a Type.
Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: tudor.gi...@gmail.com Cc: anquetil...@gmail.com
Comment #1 on issue 584 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: AnnotationType should be a FAMIX Type http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=584
Name: Famix-Java-TudorGirba.51 Author: TudorGirba Time: 12 April 2011, 11:54:51 am UUID: ae3fc077-5341-458e-8ec1-c7055e6f3506 Ancestors: Famix-Java-TudorGirba.50
AnnotationType is now subclass of Type AnnotationTypeAttribute is now subclass of Attribute
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=584
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=585
Hi,
I am not seeing the change in the latest moose-dev
(same for AnnotationTypeAttribute)
nicolas
----- Mail original -----
De: moose-technology@googlecode.com À: moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch Envoyé: Mardi 12 Avril 2011 11:56:01 Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: Issue 584 in moose-technology: AnnotationType should be a FAMIX Type Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: tudor.gi...@gmail.com Cc: anquetil...@gmail.com
Comment #1 on issue 584 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: AnnotationType should be a FAMIX Type http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=584
Name: Famix-Java-TudorGirba.51 Author: TudorGirba Time: 12 April 2011, 11:54:51 am UUID: ae3fc077-5341-458e-8ec1-c7055e6f3506 Ancestors: Famix-Java-TudorGirba.50
AnnotationType is now subclass of Type AnnotationTypeAttribute is now subclass of Attribute
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=584
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=585
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Hi,
I have just downloaded the latest image and AnnotationType is a subclass of Type and AnnotationTypeAttribute is a subclass of Attribute: http://hudson.moosetechnology.org/job/moose-latest-dev/lastSuccessfulBuild/a...
Cheers, Doru
On 13 Apr 2011, at 08:48, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
Hi,
I am not seeing the change in the latest moose-dev
(same for AnnotationTypeAttribute)
nicolas
----- Mail original -----
De: moose-technology@googlecode.com À: moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch Envoyé: Mardi 12 Avril 2011 11:56:01 Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: Issue 584 in moose-technology: AnnotationType should be a FAMIX Type Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: tudor.gi...@gmail.com Cc: anquetil...@gmail.com
Comment #1 on issue 584 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: AnnotationType should be a FAMIX Type http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=584
Name: Famix-Java-TudorGirba.51 Author: TudorGirba Time: 12 April 2011, 11:54:51 am UUID: ae3fc077-5341-458e-8ec1-c7055e6f3506 Ancestors: Famix-Java-TudorGirba.50
AnnotationType is now subclass of Type AnnotationTypeAttribute is now subclass of Attribute
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=584
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=585
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"What we can governs what we wish."
Right!
really sorry, too much versions downloaded, I was looking at the wrong file
I see that you finally opted for AnnotationTypeAttribute as an Attribute and not merely a StructuralEntity ...
nicolas
----- Mail original -----
De: "Tudor Girba" tudor.girba@gmail.com À: "Moose-related development" moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch Envoyé: Mercredi 13 Avril 2011 09:14:13 Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: Issue 584 in moose-technology: AnnotationType should be a FAMIX Type Hi,
I have just downloaded the latest image and AnnotationType is a subclass of Type and AnnotationTypeAttribute is a subclass of Attribute: http://hudson.moosetechnology.org/job/moose-latest-dev/lastSuccessfulBuild/a...
Cheers, Doru
On 13 Apr 2011, at 08:48, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
Hi,
I am not seeing the change in the latest moose-dev
(same for AnnotationTypeAttribute)
nicolas
----- Mail original -----
De: moose-technology@googlecode.com À: moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch Envoyé: Mardi 12 Avril 2011 11:56:01 Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: Issue 584 in moose-technology: AnnotationType should be a FAMIX Type Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: tudor.gi...@gmail.com Cc: anquetil...@gmail.com
Comment #1 on issue 584 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: AnnotationType should be a FAMIX Type http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=584
Name: Famix-Java-TudorGirba.51 Author: TudorGirba Time: 12 April 2011, 11:54:51 am UUID: ae3fc077-5341-458e-8ec1-c7055e6f3506 Ancestors: Famix-Java-TudorGirba.50
AnnotationType is now subclass of Type AnnotationTypeAttribute is now subclass of Attribute
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=584
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=585
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"What we can governs what we wish."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev