Hi!
I've just integrated the fix of Mathieu.
1.395 : Integrated optimization from Mathieu. Excellent job! [| view | view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new. view nodes: Object withAllSubclasses. view edgesFrom: #superclass. view treeLayout. view applyLayout ] timeToRun => 91856 before this version => 48519 with this version
Cheers, Alexandre
Great news. What were the changes about?
On my machine (MacBookPro 2,6GHz i7) and in a Moose 4.8 image, I get: - old version ==> 131966 - new version ==> 73591
Which is great.
However, when I do the same with the original Mondrian, I get:
[| view | view := MOViewRenderer new. view nodes: Object withAllSubclasses. view edgesFrom: #superclass. view treeLayout. view root applyLayout ] timeToRun.
==> 40818
I would be curious to know where the difference comes from.
Cheers, Doru
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.comwrote:
Hi!
I've just integrated the fix of Mathieu.
1.395 : Integrated optimization from Mathieu. Excellent job! [| view | view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new. view nodes: Object withAllSubclasses. view edgesFrom: #superclass. view treeLayout. view applyLayout ] timeToRun => 91856 before this version => 48519 with this version
Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
:-) I did not think about comparing with the old Mondrian. I will try.
Alexandre
On Aug 9, 2013, at 2:38 AM, Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com wrote:
Great news. What were the changes about?
On my machine (MacBookPro 2,6GHz i7) and in a Moose 4.8 image, I get:
- old version ==> 131966
- new version ==> 73591
Which is great.
However, when I do the same with the original Mondrian, I get:
[| view | view := MOViewRenderer new. view nodes: Object withAllSubclasses. view edgesFrom: #superclass. view treeLayout. view root applyLayout ] timeToRun.
==> 40818
I would be curious to know where the difference comes from.
Cheers, Doru
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com wrote: Hi!
I've just integrated the fix of Mathieu.
1.395 : Integrated optimization from Mathieu. Excellent job! [| view | view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new. view nodes: Object withAllSubclasses. view edgesFrom: #superclass. view treeLayout. view applyLayout ] timeToRun => 91856 before this version => 48519 with this version
Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow" _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
The numbers I got on my machine (MacBookPro 2,3GHz i7):
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.comwrote:
Hi!
I've just integrated the fix of Mathieu.
1.395 : Integrated optimization from Mathieu. Excellent job! [| view | view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new. view nodes: Object withAllSubclasses. view edgesFrom: #superclass. view treeLayout. view applyLayout ] timeToRun => 91856 before this version => 48519 with this version
==> 78380 With old Mondrian: ==> 42625
That's strange because for me one of the purposes of building Roassal was to improve performance but the numbers are suggesting contrary.
Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
I imagine that Roassal is doing more. But indeed this is interesting.
The numbers I got on my machine (MacBookPro 2,3GHz i7):
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com wrote: Hi!
I've just integrated the fix of Mathieu.
1.395 : Integrated optimization from Mathieu. Excellent job! [| view | view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new. view nodes: Object withAllSubclasses. view edgesFrom: #superclass. view treeLayout. view applyLayout ] timeToRun => 91856 before this version => 48519 with this version
==> 78380 With old Mondrian: ==> 42625
That's strange because for me one of the purposes of building Roassal was to improve performance but the numbers are suggesting contrary.
Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Hi,
Roassal was certainly not done out of performance reasons, but due to lack of flexibility in terms of animation :).
Doru
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 9, 2013, at 9:43, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote:
The numbers I got on my machine (MacBookPro 2,3GHz i7):
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com wrote:
Hi!
I've just integrated the fix of Mathieu.
1.395 : Integrated optimization from Mathieu. Excellent job! [| view | view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new. view nodes: Object withAllSubclasses. view edgesFrom: #superclass. view treeLayout. view applyLayout ] timeToRun => 91856 before this version => 48519 with this version
==> 78380 With old Mondrian: ==> 42625
That's strange because for me one of the purposes of building Roassal was to improve performance but the numbers are suggesting contrary.
Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com wrote:
Hi,
Roassal was certainly not done out of performance reasons, but due to lack of flexibility in terms of animation :).
Ok, then I didn't understand it correctly :).
Doru
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 9, 2013, at 9:43, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote:
The numbers I got on my machine (MacBookPro 2,3GHz i7):
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.comwrote:
Hi!
I've just integrated the fix of Mathieu.
1.395 : Integrated optimization from Mathieu. Excellent job! [| view | view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new. view nodes: Object withAllSubclasses. view edgesFrom: #superclass. view treeLayout. view applyLayout ] timeToRun => 91856 before this version => 48519 with this version
==> 78380 With old Mondrian: ==> 42625
That's strange because for me one of the purposes of building Roassal was to improve performance but the numbers are suggesting contrary.
Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba -
Usman Bhatti