I remember now why we have this strange mismatch in place.

In the MSE files, is written eg "FAMIX.Foo" and hence the meta- description must match. Unfortunately the smalltalk implementation has never been move the the FAMIX namespace but is still in SCG.Moose.FAMIX*. Move the metamodel to another namespace is nothing I can do alone right now, it would break too much.

Alas, AA

On 15 Aug 2007, at 9:03 , sellossa@ensieta.fr wrote:

thank you Adrian

Indeed, It could be useful for my application.

Sara

...

Hi Sara,

for some unfortunate reason, the mapping between Smalltalk namespaces and model packages is not 1:1. One of the exceptions is that all SCG.Moose.FAMIX* classes are modeled using FAMIX.* meta-descriptions.

If this is a real problem for your application, I can fix that tomorrow.

cheers, AA

On 14 Aug 2007, at 21:04 , sellossa@ensieta.fr wrote:

...

Hi Adrian!

I get something weird when I use it for SCG.Moose. When I do: |package| SCG.Moose asMetaDescription classes. package:=SCG.Moose asMetaDescription inspect.

package doesn't contain the entites FAMIXClass, FAMIXAttribute and so on...

However, FAMIX entites are defined in the namespace SCG.Moose, isn't it?

Thanks you for your help

Sara

---

Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev