Well, you can start splitting the project anyway.
Doru
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com>wrote;wrote:
Ok, so as far as I understand - we'll release
Moose 4.8 and then I can
start to integrate FAST into Moose 5?
Uko
On 17 серп. 2013, at 09:15, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote:
Yes, I followed Stef's suggestion. Moreover at the beginning I wasn't so
sure about what I'm doing, so I didn't want to mess directly with FAMIX
Uko
Надіслано з iPhone
16 серп. 2013 о 22:08 Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> написав(ла):
The AST should certainly be separate, like it is now. But, it would be
more effective to have the FAMIX entity directly linked with the AST. I
used this pattern on a couple of projects and it makes querying quite cheap.
Cheers,
Doru
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Nicolas Anquetil <
Nicolas.Anquetil(a)inria.fr> wrote:
As I remember it, it was a suggestion of Stephane and Marcus to isolate
FAST from FAMIX
nicolas
On 08/16/2013 03:42 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Also, I do not quite understand the need for the FAMIX wrapper classes
from FAST-Model. For example, you have
"FAMIXSourcedEntity subclass: #FASTBehaviouralEntity"
Why was FAMIXBehaviouralEntity not enough?
Doru
--
Nicolas Anquetil -- RMod research team (Inria)
______________________________**_________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/**mailman/listinfo/moose-dev<https://www.iam.un…
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev