Dear All,
I adapted to Glamour what I did for Mondrian
You will find below the report. I tried to find a bottleneck, but Glamour behaves linearly in all my tries. This is a good news therefore :-) The report has been generated by doit-ing: GlamourousHealth new produceReport
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Report produced on 2009-10-23T16:33:00+00:00 Version a MCVersionInfo(GlamourLoader-tg.34) ------------------ Opening Browser Benchmark: 15 openings => 3622 ms ------------------
------------------ Selecting Item Benchmark: 100 size and selections => 709 ms 200 size and selections => 815 ms 300 size and selections => 895 ms 400 size and selections => 993 ms 500 size and selections => 1094 ms 600 size and selections => 1197 ms 700 size and selections => 1705 ms 800 size and selections => 1431 ms 900 size and selections => 1533 ms 1000 size and selections => 1639 ms 1500 size and selections => 2493 ms 2000 size and selections => 2729 ms ------------------
------------------ Selecting in finder item Benchmark: 1 size and selections => 26 ms 5 size and selections => 148 ms 10 size and selections => 328 ms 15 size and selections => 483 ms 20 size and selections => 636 ms 25 size and selections => 833 ms 30 size and selections => 999 ms 35 size and selections => 1289 ms 40 size and selections => 1483 ms 45 size and selections => 1700 ms 50 size and selections => 1881 ms ------------------
33.02 % of methods are covered Progress from last time: 0.0 % -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
I also worked on a test coverage tool. Here is what I obtain for Glamour. Execute: GlamourousHealth new viewTestCoverage
to have a mondrian rendering of the coverage. Inner light red boxes are methods that are not directly or indirectly executed by unit tests. Inner white boxes are methods executed when running the tests. Outer boxes are classes. Edges designate superclass links.
Feedback are welcome
Cheers, Alexandre
NB: You need to install www.squeaksource.com/Spy.html in order to get the test coverage
Thanks, Alex!
It looks interesting, but I have a couple of issues :): - I could not understand what selecting means. - There is something wrong with loading Spy. It tells me that it needs AnObsoleteSMethodInfo. Could you try to load it in a fresh image? Maybe something went wrong during refactoring?
Cheers, Doru
On 23 Oct 2009, at 21:49, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Dear All,
I adapted to Glamour what I did for Mondrian
You will find below the report. I tried to find a bottleneck, but Glamour behaves linearly in all my tries. This is a good news therefore :-) The report has been generated by doit-ing: GlamourousHealth new produceReport
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Report produced on 2009-10-23T16:33:00+00:00 Version a MCVersionInfo(GlamourLoader-tg.34)
Opening Browser Benchmark: 15 openings => 3622 ms
Selecting Item Benchmark: 100 size and selections => 709 ms 200 size and selections => 815 ms 300 size and selections => 895 ms 400 size and selections => 993 ms 500 size and selections => 1094 ms 600 size and selections => 1197 ms 700 size and selections => 1705 ms 800 size and selections => 1431 ms 900 size and selections => 1533 ms 1000 size and selections => 1639 ms 1500 size and selections => 2493 ms 2000 size and selections => 2729 ms
Selecting in finder item Benchmark: 1 size and selections => 26 ms 5 size and selections => 148 ms 10 size and selections => 328 ms 15 size and selections => 483 ms 20 size and selections => 636 ms 25 size and selections => 833 ms 30 size and selections => 999 ms 35 size and selections => 1289 ms 40 size and selections => 1483 ms 45 size and selections => 1700 ms 50 size and selections => 1881 ms
33.02 % of methods are covered Progress from last time: 0.0 % -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
I also worked on a test coverage tool. Here is what I obtain for Glamour. Execute: GlamourousHealth new viewTestCoverage
to have a mondrian rendering of the coverage. Inner light red boxes are methods that are not directly or indirectly executed by unit tests. Inner white boxes are methods executed when running the tests. Outer boxes are classes. Edges designate superclass links.
<GlamourTestCoverage.png>
Feedback are welcome
Cheers, Alexandre
NB: You need to install www.squeaksource.com/Spy.html in order to get the test coverage -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Sometimes the best solution is not the best solution."
- I could not understand what selecting means.
I refined the name. A new version of Spy and Glamour-Tests are available.
Cheers, Alexandre
On 23 Oct 2009, at 21:49, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Dear All,
I adapted to Glamour what I did for Mondrian
You will find below the report. I tried to find a bottleneck, but Glamour behaves linearly in all my tries. This is a good news therefore :-) The report has been generated by doit-ing: GlamourousHealth new produceReport
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Report produced on 2009-10-23T16:33:00+00:00 Version a MCVersionInfo(GlamourLoader-tg.34)
Opening Browser Benchmark: 15 openings => 3622 ms
Selecting Item Benchmark: 100 size and selections => 709 ms 200 size and selections => 815 ms 300 size and selections => 895 ms 400 size and selections => 993 ms 500 size and selections => 1094 ms 600 size and selections => 1197 ms 700 size and selections => 1705 ms 800 size and selections => 1431 ms 900 size and selections => 1533 ms 1000 size and selections => 1639 ms 1500 size and selections => 2493 ms 2000 size and selections => 2729 ms
Selecting in finder item Benchmark: 1 size and selections => 26 ms 5 size and selections => 148 ms 10 size and selections => 328 ms 15 size and selections => 483 ms 20 size and selections => 636 ms 25 size and selections => 833 ms 30 size and selections => 999 ms 35 size and selections => 1289 ms 40 size and selections => 1483 ms 45 size and selections => 1700 ms 50 size and selections => 1881 ms
33.02 % of methods are covered Progress from last time: 0.0 % -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
I also worked on a test coverage tool. Here is what I obtain for Glamour. Execute: GlamourousHealth new viewTestCoverage
to have a mondrian rendering of the coverage. Inner light red boxes are methods that are not directly or indirectly executed by unit tests. Inner white boxes are methods executed when running the tests. Outer boxes are classes. Edges designate superclass links.
<GlamourTestCoverage.png>
Feedback are welcome
Cheers, Alexandre
NB: You need to install www.squeaksource.com/Spy.html in order to get the test coverage -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Sometimes the best solution is not the best solution."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Tudor Girba