Hi,
On 23 Oct 2011, at 22:52, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
buildIn:
composer
composer tabulator with: [:t |
t ...
]
The old way still works, of course. The nice thing about this solution is that it works
better with the editor (you are given the composer).
For a live example, see:
http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/building-a-simple-code-browser
Let me know what you think.
"composer" is a very generic term. Wouldn't "browser" be a better
variable name?
I am not quite satisfied with the name, but "browser" because it is not a
browser. It is a composite presentation. So, for someone knowing a bit the internals of
Glamour it would be confusing.
I was actually thinking of renaming the GLMCompositePresenatation to GLMComposer. Or does
anyone else have other ideas?
Cheers,
Doru
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
If you can't say why something is relevant,
it probably isn't.