Hey,
I usually inspect a lot with arrays and since recently, I don't see really an array content, just number of items, eg:
#( #('a' 'b') #('b')) -> inspect
an Array [2 items] an Array [1 item]
Instead of: #( #('a' 'b') #('b'))
This is -- for me -- super-annoying. do you think an original functionality can be returned back, or you have some serious reasons to have it like this?
Cheers, Jan
Hi,
This was changed on purpose but it was mainly targeted to the label in the inspector. The problem is that when you have a large amount of items, the label did not work well.
The issue was here: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14582/Inspecting-collections-Don-t-print-t...
Your current issue is related to how the items look in the Items presentation. Indeed, there we also use the same gtDisplayString.
Could you open a pharo issue with this?
Cheers, Doru
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Jan Kurš kurs.jan@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
I usually inspect a lot with arrays and since recently, I don't see really an array content, just number of items, eg:
#( #('a' 'b') #('b')) -> inspect
an Array [2 items] an Array [1 item]
Instead of: #( #('a' 'b') #('b'))
This is -- for me -- super-annoying. do you think an original functionality can be returned back, or you have some serious reasons to have it like this?
Cheers, Jan
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Hi, Thank you for the information. Would it be possible if the behaviour is like this:
- Show string if the string is bellow N characters - Show number of items if the printString is above N characters?
I will do the change, if you agree this is ok ...
Cheers, Jan
On 8 April 2015 at 09:24, Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com wrote:
Hi,
This was changed on purpose but it was mainly targeted to the label in the inspector. The problem is that when you have a large amount of items, the label did not work well.
The issue was here:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14582/Inspecting-collections-Don-t-print-t...
Your current issue is related to how the items look in the Items presentation. Indeed, there we also use the same gtDisplayString.
Could you open a pharo issue with this?
Cheers, Doru
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Jan Kurš kurs.jan@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
I usually inspect a lot with arrays and since recently, I don't see really an array content, just number of items, eg:
#( #('a' 'b') #('b')) -> inspect
an Array [2 items] an Array [1 item]
Instead of: #( #('a' 'b') #('b'))
This is -- for me -- super-annoying. do you think an original functionality can be returned back, or you have some serious reasons to have it like this?
Cheers, Jan
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Please open the issue and let's discuss there, because Nicolai will likely want to participate as well :)
Doru
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Jan Kurš kurs.jan@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Thank you for the information. Would it be possible if the behaviour is like this:
- Show string if the string is bellow N characters
- Show number of items if the printString is above N characters?
I will do the change, if you agree this is ok ...
Cheers, Jan
On 8 April 2015 at 09:24, Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com wrote:
Hi,
This was changed on purpose but it was mainly targeted to the label in the inspector. The problem is that when you have a large amount of items, the label did not work well.
The issue was here:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14582/Inspecting-collections-Don-t-print-t...
Your current issue is related to how the items look in the Items presentation. Indeed, there we also use the same gtDisplayString.
Could you open a pharo issue with this?
Cheers, Doru
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Jan Kurš kurs.jan@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
I usually inspect a lot with arrays and since recently, I don't see really an array content, just number of items, eg:
#( #('a' 'b') #('b')) -> inspect
an Array [2 items] an Array [1 item]
Instead of: #( #('a' 'b') #('b'))
This is -- for me -- super-annoying. do you think an original functionality can be returned back, or you have some serious reasons to have it like this?
Cheers, Jan
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
2015-04-08 9:47 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com:
Please open the issue and let's discuss there, because Nicolai will likely want to participate as well :)
For sure!
Doru
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Jan Kurš kurs.jan@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Thank you for the information. Would it be possible if the behaviour is like this:
- Show string if the string is bellow N characters
- Show number of items if the printString is above N characters?
I will do the change, if you agree this is ok ...
Cheers, Jan
On 8 April 2015 at 09:24, Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com wrote:
Hi,
This was changed on purpose but it was mainly targeted to the label in the inspector. The problem is that when you have a large amount of items, the label did not work well.
The issue was here:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14582/Inspecting-collections-Don-t-print-t...
Your current issue is related to how the items look in the Items presentation. Indeed, there we also use the same gtDisplayString.
Could you open a pharo issue with this?
Cheers, Doru
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Jan Kurš kurs.jan@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
I usually inspect a lot with arrays and since recently, I don't see really an array content, just number of items, eg:
#( #('a' 'b') #('b')) -> inspect
an Array [2 items] an Array [1 item]
Instead of: #( #('a' 'b') #('b'))
This is -- for me -- super-annoying. do you think an original functionality can be returned back, or you have some serious reasons to have it like this?
Cheers, Jan
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
I created the issue: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/15311/The-display-string-for-collection-ma...
Let's continue the conversation there.
Cheers, Doru
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Nicolai Hess nicolaihess@web.de wrote:
2015-04-08 9:47 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com:
Please open the issue and let's discuss there, because Nicolai will likely want to participate as well :)
For sure!
Doru
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Jan Kurš kurs.jan@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Thank you for the information. Would it be possible if the behaviour is like this:
- Show string if the string is bellow N characters
- Show number of items if the printString is above N characters?
I will do the change, if you agree this is ok ...
Cheers, Jan
On 8 April 2015 at 09:24, Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com wrote:
Hi,
This was changed on purpose but it was mainly targeted to the label in the inspector. The problem is that when you have a large amount of items, the label did not work well.
The issue was here:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14582/Inspecting-collections-Don-t-print-t...
Your current issue is related to how the items look in the Items presentation. Indeed, there we also use the same gtDisplayString.
Could you open a pharo issue with this?
Cheers, Doru
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Jan Kurš kurs.jan@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
I usually inspect a lot with arrays and since recently, I don't see really an array content, just number of items, eg:
#( #('a' 'b') #('b')) -> inspect
an Array [2 items] an Array [1 item]
Instead of: #( #('a' 'b') #('b'))
This is -- for me -- super-annoying. do you think an original functionality can be returned back, or you have some serious reasons to have it like this?
Cheers, Jan
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-
Jan Kurš -
Nicolai Hess -
Tudor Girba