Hi,
It would be nice if the moose5.1 (https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-5.1/) image has no failing tests. 2 tests are failing :
javascript:showStackTrace('test-GT.Tests.Spotter.GTSpotterProcessorsForExamplesTest.testEachProcessor','GT.Tests.Spotter/GTSpotterProcessorsForExamplesTest/testEachProcessor//summary') GT.Tests.Spotter.GTSpotterProcessorsForExamplesTest.testEachProcessorhttps://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-5.1/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/GT.Tests.Spotter/GTSpotterProcessorsForExamplesTest/testEachProcessor/
1 mn 43 s
javascript:showStackTrace('test-GT.Tests.Inspector.GTInspectorExamplesTest.testAllExamples','GT.Tests.Inspector/GTInspectorExamplesTest/testAllExamples//summary') GT.Tests.Inspector.GTInspectorExamplesTest.testAllExampleshttps://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-5.1/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/GT.Tests.Inspector/GTInspectorExamplesTest/testAllExamples/
10 mn
The second has a duration of 10mins which is very long. Does it mandatory do run it and does it possible to split it ? A way to solve them is to change in RTGrapherExample>>exampleSeismDepthAndMag and exampleSeisms, http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/feed/v0.1/summary/2.5_month.csv by http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/feed/v1.0/summary/2.5_month.csv But as it is in Roassal repo I cannot commit it... and one will have to change the configuration of Moose5.1...
By the way, does the GT* tests can be done in a GT job, e.g.: https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/gtoolkit5 or https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/gtoolkit/?
Cheers, Vincent
________________________________
Ce message et les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et r?serv?s ? l'usage exclusif de ses destinataires. Il peut ?galement ?tre prot?g? par le secret professionnel. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci d'en avertir imm?diatement l'exp?diteur et de le d?truire. L'int?grit? du message ne pouvant ?tre assur?e sur Internet, la responsabilit? de Worldline ne pourra ?tre recherch?e quant au contenu de ce message. Bien que les meilleurs efforts soient faits pour maintenir cette transmission exempte de tout virus, l'exp?diteur ne donne aucune garantie ? cet ?gard et sa responsabilit? ne saurait ?tre recherch?e pour tout dommage r?sultant d'un virus transmis.
This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Worldline liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted.
Hi.
The GT tests are generic tests that work on customizations that are built on top of GT. Thus, they have to run in the Moose job.
Indeed, perhaps some examples could be ignored for the purpose of tests. We will certainly have something for this in GT5 for Moose 6/Pharo 5.
Moose 5.1 has only GT. GT 5 is made for Moose 6/Pharo 5 and it is not yet ready for any public consumption.
Cheers, Doru
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Blondeau Vincent < vincent.blondeau@worldline.com> wrote:
Hi,
It would be nice if the moose5.1 (https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-5.1/) image has no failing tests.
2 tests are failing :
GT.Tests.Spotter.GTSpotterProcessorsForExamplesTest.testEachProcessor
1 mn 43 s
GT.Tests.Inspector.GTInspectorExamplesTest.testAllExamples
10 mn
The second has a duration of 10mins which is very long. Does it mandatory do run it and does it possible to split it ?
A way to solve them is to change in RTGrapherExample>>exampleSeismDepthAndMag and exampleSeisms, http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/feed/v0.1/summary/2.5_month.csv by http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/feed/v1.0/summary/2.5_month.csv
But as it is in Roassal repo I cannot commit it… and one will have to change the configuration of Moose5.1…
By the way, does the GT* tests can be done in a GT job, e.g.: https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/gtoolkit5 or https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/gtoolkit/?
Cheers,
Vincent
Ce message et les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et réservés à l'usage exclusif de ses destinataires. Il peut également être protégé par le secret professionnel. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci d'en avertir immédiatement l'expéditeur et de le détruire. L'intégrité du message ne pouvant être assurée sur Internet, la responsabilité de Worldline ne pourra être recherchée quant au contenu de ce message. Bien que les meilleurs efforts soient faits pour maintenir cette transmission exempte de tout virus, l'expéditeur ne donne aucune garantie à cet égard et sa responsabilité ne saurait être recherchée pour tout dommage résultant d'un virus transmis.
This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Worldline liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
I do not understand. This problem has been fixed some times ago. RTGrapherExample new exampleSeismDepthAndMag => open correctly in my image.
Why Moose 5.1 fails? Maybe we should just shutdown 5.1 and focus on 6.0.
Cheers, Alexandre
On Jun 17, 2015, at 9:48 AM, Blondeau Vincent vincent.blondeau@worldline.com wrote:
Hi,
It would be nice if the moose5.1 (https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-5.1/) image has no failing tests. 2 tests are failing :
GT.Tests.Spotter.GTSpotterProcessorsForExamplesTest.testEachProcessor
1 mn 43 s 44
GT.Tests.Inspector.GTInspectorExamplesTest.testAllExamples
10 mn 45
The second has a duration of 10mins which is very long. Does it mandatory do run it and does it possible to split it ? A way to solve them is to change in RTGrapherExample>>exampleSeismDepthAndMag and exampleSeisms, http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/feed/v0.1/summary/2.5_month.csv byhttp://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/feed/v1.0/summary/2.5_month.csv But as it is in Roassal repo I cannot commit it… and one will have to change the configuration of Moose5.1…
By the way, does the GT* tests can be done in a GT job, e.g.: https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/gtoolkit5 orhttps://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/gtoolkit/?
Cheers, Vincent
Ce message et les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et réservés à l'usage exclusif de ses destinataires. Il peut également être protégé par le secret professionnel. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci d'en avertir immédiatement l'expéditeur et de le détruire. L'intégrité du message ne pouvant être assurée sur Internet, la responsabilité de Worldline ne pourra être recherchée quant au contenu de ce message. Bien que les meilleurs efforts soient faits pour maintenir cette transmission exempte de tout virus, l'expéditeur ne donne aucune garantie à cet égard et sa responsabilité ne saurait être recherchée pour tout dommage résultant d'un virus transmis.
This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Worldline liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
On 19-06-15 01:02, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I do not understand. This problem has been fixed some times ago. RTGrapherExample new exampleSeismDepthAndMag => open correctly in my image.
Why Moose 5.1 fails? Maybe we should just shutdown 5.1 and focus on 6.0.
Because the ConfigurationOfRoassal2 says that #stable for Pharo 4.x is version1.12, which refers to Roassal2-AlexandreBergel.913 which is from before the fix?
Stephan
Well spotted.
I have modified the configuration and produced a branch of that old release of Roassal2. It should be fixed now I think
Cheers, Alexandre
Hi Alexandre,
The Moose 5.1 build is still failing.
From what I see configuration of roassal2 now loads version 1.11 instead
of 12.1.
Do you still have problems with an older version of glamour?
Cheers, Andrei
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com wrote:
Well spotted.
I have modified the configuration and produced a branch of that old release of Roassal2. It should be fixed now I think
Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Jun 18, 2015, at 9:04 PM, stephan stephan@stack.nl wrote:
On 19-06-15 01:02, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I do not understand. This problem has been fixed some times ago. RTGrapherExample new exampleSeismDepthAndMag => open correctly in my image.
Why Moose 5.1 fails? Maybe we should just shutdown 5.1 and focus on 6.0.
Because the ConfigurationOfRoassal2 says that #stable for Pharo 4.x is version1.12, which refers to Roassal2-AlexandreBergel.913 which is from before the fix?
Stephan
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
I am not sure how to fix this. Version 1.13, as you defined is suitable to be stable.
The last version of Roassal may be considered as stable.
Alexandre
On Jul 1, 2015, at 3:17 PM, Andrei Chis chisvasileandrei@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alexandre,
The Moose 5.1 build is still failing.
From what I see configuration of roassal2 now loads version 1.11 instead of 12.1.
Do you still have problems with an older version of glamour?
Cheers, Andrei
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com wrote: Well spotted.
I have modified the configuration and produced a branch of that old release of Roassal2. It should be fixed now I think
Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Jun 18, 2015, at 9:04 PM, stephan stephan@stack.nl wrote:
On 19-06-15 01:02, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I do not understand. This problem has been fixed some times ago. RTGrapherExample new exampleSeismDepthAndMag => open correctly in my image.
Why Moose 5.1 fails? Maybe we should just shutdown 5.1 and focus on 6.0.
Because the ConfigurationOfRoassal2 says that #stable for Pharo 4.x is version1.12, which refers to Roassal2-AlexandreBergel.913 which is from before the fix?
Stephan
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Ok. I'll make again 1.13 as stable, only for Pharo 4, add see if I can fix the moose5.1 build.
Cheers, Andrei
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com wrote:
I am not sure how to fix this. Version 1.13, as you defined is suitable to be stable.
The last version of Roassal may be considered as stable.
Alexandre
On Jul 1, 2015, at 3:17 PM, Andrei Chis chisvasileandrei@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Alexandre,
The Moose 5.1 build is still failing.
From what I see configuration of roassal2 now loads version 1.11
instead of 12.1.
Do you still have problems with an older version of glamour?
Cheers, Andrei
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Alexandre Bergel <
alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:
Well spotted.
I have modified the configuration and produced a branch of that old
release of Roassal2.
It should be fixed now I think
Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Jun 18, 2015, at 9:04 PM, stephan stephan@stack.nl wrote:
On 19-06-15 01:02, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I do not understand. This problem has been fixed some times ago. RTGrapherExample new exampleSeismDepthAndMag => open correctly in my image.
Why Moose 5.1 fails? Maybe we should just shutdown 5.1 and focus on
6.0.
Because the ConfigurationOfRoassal2 says that #stable for Pharo 4.x is version1.12, which refers to Roassal2-AlexandreBergel.913 which is from before the fix?
Stephan
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Okay!
Cheers, Alexandre
On Jul 3, 2015, at 2:52 PM, Andrei Chis chisvasileandrei@gmail.com wrote:
Ok. I'll make again 1.13 as stable, only for Pharo 4, add see if I can fix the moose5.1 build.
Cheers, Andrei
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com wrote: I am not sure how to fix this. Version 1.13, as you defined is suitable to be stable.
The last version of Roassal may be considered as stable.
Alexandre
On Jul 1, 2015, at 3:17 PM, Andrei Chis chisvasileandrei@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alexandre,
The Moose 5.1 build is still failing.
From what I see configuration of roassal2 now loads version 1.11 instead of 12.1.
Do you still have problems with an older version of glamour?
Cheers, Andrei
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com wrote: Well spotted.
I have modified the configuration and produced a branch of that old release of Roassal2. It should be fixed now I think
Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Jun 18, 2015, at 9:04 PM, stephan stephan@stack.nl wrote:
On 19-06-15 01:02, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I do not understand. This problem has been fixed some times ago. RTGrapherExample new exampleSeismDepthAndMag => open correctly in my image.
Why Moose 5.1 fails? Maybe we should just shutdown 5.1 and focus on 6.0.
Because the ConfigurationOfRoassal2 says that #stable for Pharo 4.x is version1.12, which refers to Roassal2-AlexandreBergel.913 which is from before the fix?
Stephan
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
I fixed version 1.13 to load in Pharo 4. Now doing 'ConfigurationOfRoassal2 load' should work correctly in Pharo 4. Also the moose 5.1 build is now green.
I would help not to change 1.13 from now on.
Cheers, Andrei
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com wrote:
Okay!
Cheers, Alexandre
On Jul 3, 2015, at 2:52 PM, Andrei Chis chisvasileandrei@gmail.com
wrote:
Ok. I'll make again 1.13 as stable, only for Pharo 4, add see if I can
fix the moose5.1 build.
Cheers, Andrei
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Alexandre Bergel <
alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:
I am not sure how to fix this. Version 1.13, as you defined is suitable to be stable.
The last version of Roassal may be considered as stable.
Alexandre
On Jul 1, 2015, at 3:17 PM, Andrei Chis chisvasileandrei@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Alexandre,
The Moose 5.1 build is still failing.
From what I see configuration of roassal2 now loads version 1.11
instead of 12.1.
Do you still have problems with an older version of glamour?
Cheers, Andrei
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Alexandre Bergel <
alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:
Well spotted.
I have modified the configuration and produced a branch of that old
release of Roassal2.
It should be fixed now I think
Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Jun 18, 2015, at 9:04 PM, stephan stephan@stack.nl wrote:
On 19-06-15 01:02, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I do not understand. This problem has been fixed some times ago. RTGrapherExample new exampleSeismDepthAndMag => open correctly in my image.
Why Moose 5.1 fails? Maybe we should just shutdown 5.1 and focus on
6.0.
Because the ConfigurationOfRoassal2 says that #stable for Pharo 4.x is version1.12, which refers to Roassal2-AlexandreBergel.913 which is from before the fix?
Stephan
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Andrei Chis -
Blondeau Vincent -
stephan -
Tudor Girba