18 Mar
2010
18 Mar
'10
10:42 a.m.
Hello,
In which cases should we describe a property with a pragma ?
I guess that property-pragmas will be used to set the list of attributes to
the FM3MetaDescription of the class.
But by looking quikly to the famix implementation, it seems that some
properties are described and other not.
For example, in FAMIXPackage, the method 'classes' is not described.
Therefore it does not appear in the FAMIXPackageMetaDescription
listOfAttributes.
I don't know the reason?
18 Mar
18 Mar
1:39 p.m.
One reason is that #classes is a query on another attribute of FamixPackage, not a
stand-alone attribute. As such, it is not necessary to describe it for MSE. (and as noted
by Alex, we prefer to use groups for navigation in the model). Now it's possible to
describe this attribute. I will just mark it as derived in this case.
On 18 mars 2010, at 10:42, Cyrille Delaunay wrote:
Hello,
In which cases should we describe a property with a pragma ?
I guess that property-pragmas will be used to set the list of attributes to the
FM3MetaDescription of the class.
But by looking quikly to the famix implementation, it seems that some properties are
described and other not.
For example, in FAMIXPackage, the method 'classes' is not described. Therefore it
does not appear in the FAMIXPackageMetaDescription listOfAttributes.
I don't know the reason?
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon
1:57 p.m.
One reason for describing a property with a pragma is to make tools
aware of this pragma.
In the example you said, it is more relevant for the user to deal with
groups instead of collection. MooseAbstractGroup>>allClasses contains
the pragma #navigation:.
Alexandre
On 18 Mar 2010, at 05:42, Cyrille Delaunay wrote:
Hello,
In which cases should we describe a property with a pragma ?
I guess that property-pragmas will be used to set the list of
attributes to the FM3MetaDescription of the class.
But by looking quikly to the famix implementation, it seems that
some properties are described and other not.
For example, in FAMIXPackage, the method 'classes' is not described.
Therefore it does not appear in the FAMIXPackageMetaDescription
listOfAttributes.
I don't know the reason?
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
1:06 p.m.
Ok. But pragmas I talk about are pragmas like:
<MSEProperty: #methods type: #FAMIXMethod opposite: #parentType>
<multivalued> <derived>
that will be used to build the metaDescriptions of the famix classes.
In my example, I wonder why the method 'classes' is not described with such
a pragma
2010/3/18 Alexandre Bergel <alexandre(a)bergel.eu>
One reason for describing a property with a pragma is
to make tools aware
of this pragma.
In the example you said, it is more relevant for the user to deal with
groups instead of collection. MooseAbstractGroup>>allClasses contains the
pragma #navigation:.
Alexandre
On 18 Mar 2010, at 05:42, Cyrille Delaunay wrote:
Hello,
In which cases should we describe a property with
a pragma ?
I guess that property-pragmas will be used to set the list of attributes
to the FM3MetaDescription of the class.
But by looking quikly to the famix implementation, it seems that some
properties are described and other not.
For example, in FAMIXPackage, the method 'classes' is not described.
Therefore it does not appear in the FAMIXPackageMetaDescription
listOfAttributes.
I don't know the reason?
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
2:11 p.m.
Maybe because FAMIXPackage is not properly fame described?
Alexandre
On 18 Mar 2010, at 08:06, Cyrille Delaunay wrote:
Ok. But pragmas I talk about are pragmas like:
<MSEProperty: #methods type: #FAMIXMethod opposite: #parentType>
<multivalued> <derived>
that will be used to build the metaDescriptions of the famix classes.
In my example, I wonder why the method 'classes' is not described
with such a pragma
2010/3/18 Alexandre Bergel <alexandre(a)bergel.eu>
One reason for describing a property with a pragma is to make tools
aware of this pragma.
In the example you said, it is more relevant for the user to deal
with groups instead of collection. MooseAbstractGroup>>allClasses
contains the pragma #navigation:.
Alexandre
On 18 Mar 2010, at 05:42, Cyrille Delaunay wrote:
Hello,
In which cases should we describe a property with a pragma ?
I guess that property-pragmas will be used to set the list of
attributes to the FM3MetaDescription of the class.
But by looking quikly to the famix implementation, it seems that
some properties are described and other not.
For example, in FAMIXPackage, the method 'classes' is not described.
Therefore it does not appear in the FAMIXPackageMetaDescription
listOfAttributes.
I don't know the reason?
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
5392
days inactive
5392
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Cyrille Delaunay -
Simon Denier