Hi
I would really like to change the isStub code to reflect what is it and that hani provide us completelyImported methods for the model.
Is it ok?
Stef
I am not sure to have fully understood. The set of isStub methods defined on various FAMIX classes are important and are present in my image. Are you saying that they belongs to Cook and you want make them part of Moose? It would make sense to me.
Where can I see this #completelyImported ?
Cheers, Alexandre
On 1 Nov 2008, at 07:07, stéphane ducasse wrote:
Hi
I would really like to change the isStub code to reflect what is it and that hani provide us completelyImported methods for the model.
Is it ok?
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
On Nov 3, 2008, at 3:46 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I am not sure to have fully understood. The set of isStub methods defined on various FAMIX classes are important and are present in my image.
The problem is that hani as well as doru in the past mixed the point of isStub and tried to infer the meaning of incomplete update.
Are you saying that they belongs to Cook and you want make them part of Moose? It would make sense to me.
I'm saying that isStub is different from a recursive isCompletelyImported and that both could be defined in Moose.
Hani do you have tests to cover your isStub definition?
Stef
Where can I see this #completelyImported ?
Cheers, Alexandre
On 1 Nov 2008, at 07:07, stéphane ducasse wrote:
Hi
I would really like to change the isStub code to reflect what is it and that hani provide us completelyImported methods for the model.
Is it ok?
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
I'm saying that isStub is different from a recursive isCompletelyImported and that both could be defined in Moose.
Agree on this. I guess that isCompletelyImported recurses over the imported structure and perform some isStub calls.
Cheers, Alexandre
Stef
Where can I see this #completelyImported ?
Cheers, Alexandre
On 1 Nov 2008, at 07:07, stéphane ducasse wrote:
Hi
I would really like to change the isStub code to reflect what is it and that hani provide us completelyImported methods for the model.
Is it ok?
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
yes more or less
Stef
On Nov 3, 2008, at 10:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I'm saying that isStub is different from a recursive isCompletelyImported and that both could be defined in Moose.
Agree on this. I guess that isCompletelyImported recurses over the imported structure and perform some isStub calls.
Cheers, Alexandre
Stef
Where can I see this #completelyImported ?
Cheers, Alexandre
On 1 Nov 2008, at 07:07, stéphane ducasse wrote:
Hi
I would really like to change the isStub code to reflect what is it and that hani provide us completelyImported methods for the model.
Is it ok?
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
On Nov 3, 2008, at 21:11 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
On Nov 3, 2008, at 3:46 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I am not sure to have fully understood. The set of isStub methods defined on various FAMIX classes are important and are present in my image.
The problem is that hani as well as doru in the past mixed the point of isStub and tried to infer the meaning of incomplete update.
Are you saying that they belongs to Cook and you want make them part of Moose? It would make sense to me.
I'm saying that isStub is different from a recursive isCompletelyImported and that both could be defined in Moose.
Hani do you have tests to cover your isStub definition?
no
hani
Stef
Where can I see this #completelyImported ?
Cheers, Alexandre
On 1 Nov 2008, at 07:07, stéphane ducasse wrote:
Hi
I would really like to change the isStub code to reflect what is it and that hani provide us completelyImported methods for the model.
Is it ok?
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Hani ABDEEN -
stéphane ducasse -
Stéphane Ducasse