On 28 Apr 2015, at 20:17, Tudor Girba
<tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
Up to Pharo 4, Glamour was not in the image. Things have changed now, and perhaps we
should do just that.
Cheers,
Doru
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com
<mailto:yuriy.tymchuk@me.com>> wrote:
Hi,
why can’t we put GLMRoassal2Presentation and related classes into roassal? For now when
you load roassal into your image you cannot see roassal view in the inspector, you cannot
see examples and so on. Glamour is by default now in Pharo image. Why should roassal
related code be in special glamour repo and not in roassal repo?
Uko
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch <mailto:Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
<https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev>
--
www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com/>
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev