On Dec 7, 2013, at 9:51 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: ok so let us kill it

I now moved it into a separate package: Name: Moose-RoassalPaintingsPackageBlueprint-TudorGirba.1 Author: TudorGirba Time: 8 December 2013, 8:30:41.818698 am UUID: d5aab308-867f-42f9-b022-9da1f77abeab Ancestors: moved package blueprint in an explicit separate package to make it unloadable from Moose On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Stéphane Ducasse &lt;stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr > > > This whole Package Blueprint implementation should actually go away. The > code is unmaintained and badly programmed. > > > ok so let us kill it > > sadly because I would need it > but anyway nobody really understood that when you want to build modular > system you need tools to analyse them. > We are focusing too much on publications but this is like that. > > Stef > > > > Doru > > > On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Stéphane Ducasse < > stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> >> I get one package and select >> Browse Package Blueprints >> >> when I select incomings pane -> boum >> >> >> packageForSurface: aSurface >> ^ aSurface anyOne packageScope >> >> anyone leads to a bug. >> >> Stef >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow" > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"