13 Apr
2008
13 Apr
'08
11:48 p.m.
Hi!
I wish to specify that a class belongs to a package. Which of these
invocations should I use?
famixClass setBelongsTo: package.
famixClass packageIn: package
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
14 Apr
14 Apr
12:26 a.m.
Hi Alex,
belongsTo points to the FAMIXNamespace.
packagedIn points to the FAMIXPackage.
We model Java packages as FAMIXNamespaces, so you should use
FAMIXClass>>setBelongsTo: . Furthermore, we also consider that a
FAMIXNamespace representing a Java package belongsTo the
FAMIXNamespace that represents the parent Java package.
Cheeers,
Doru
On Apr 13, 2008, at 11:48 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
10:59 p.m.
Ah ok...
I do not know whether there is a semantics attached to the parent
link between FAMIXNamespace. Note that there is no semantics between
two Java packages "package1" and "package1.subpackage". However,
programmers traditionally assume that classes defined in
"package1.subpackage" should not be used by classes other than the
one defined in "package1". I guess this is what you're trying to
capture with the parent link between FAMIXNamespace.
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
6197
days inactive
6198
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Tudor Girba