9 Feb
2014
9 Feb
'14
9:54 a.m.
Is it possible to provide objects instead of labels for the widgets in
Merlin? I am particularly thinking about MultiCheckboxesPart so that it is
provided with some objects and it shows their labels. Later, I would like
to get the user selection object instead of a label.
Currently, I only know how to provide labels and once user chooses (e.g. a
checkbox, i only get the selected label) and then I have to keep a
dictionary to determine the corresponding selector. Ideally, we should
provide an object along with a selector to get the labels/other properties
to be displayed.
May be something to take up at the upcoming sprint.
regards,
Usman
10 Feb
10 Feb
2:15 p.m.
As far as I know, nobody is maintaining Merlin anymore.
Actually, I would not use it. Why not using Glamour or Spec?
Alexandre
On Feb 9, 2014, at 3:54 AM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Is it possible to provide objects instead of labels
for the widgets in Merlin? I am particularly thinking about MultiCheckboxesPart so that it
is provided with some objects and it shows their labels. Later, I would like to get the
user selection object instead of a label.
Currently, I only know how to provide labels and once user chooses (e.g. a checkbox, i
only get the selected label) and then I have to keep a dictionary to determine the
corresponding selector. Ideally, we should provide an object along with a selector to get
the labels/other properties to be displayed.
May be something to take up at the upcoming sprint.
regards,
Usman
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
2:32 p.m.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Alexandre Bergel
<alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>wrote;wrote:
As far as I know, nobody is maintaining Merlin
anymore.
Agreed, but it has some nice support for creating dialogue boxes for user
questions and it is still an integral part of Moose interface.
Actually, I would not use it. Why not using Glamour or
Spec?
Glamour provides only higher-level interfaces, hence basic widgets such as
checkboxes and radio buttons are difficult to embed.
For Spec, I don't know if we have such a domain-specific extension for user
dialogues.
Alexandre
On Feb 9, 2014, at 3:54 AM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Is it possible to provide objects instead of
labels for the widgets in
Merlin? I am particularly thinking about
MultiCheckboxesPart so that it is
provided with some objects and it shows their labels. Later, I would like
to get the user selection object instead of a label.
Currently, I only know how to provide labels and once user chooses (e.g.
a
checkbox, i only get the selected label) and then I have to keep a
dictionary to determine the corresponding selector. Ideally, we should
provide an object along with a selector to get the labels/other properties
to be displayed.
May be something to take up at the upcoming sprint.
regards,
Usman
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
12 Feb
12 Feb
2:41 a.m.
2014-02-10 10:32 GMT-03:00 Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com>om>:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com
After trying *very hard* getting Merling to work, I've decided to build my
own wizard dialogs using Spec. Not a replacement but now I have some
dialogs with previous & next buttons.
Cheers,
Hernán
wrote:
As far as I know, nobody is maintaining Merlin
anymore.
Agreed, but it has some nice support for creating dialogue boxes for user
questions and it is still an integral part of Moose interface.
Actually, I would not use it. Why not using
Glamour or Spec?
Glamour provides only higher-level interfaces, hence basic widgets such as
checkboxes and radio buttons are difficult to embed.
For Spec, I don't know if we have such a domain-specific extension for
user dialogues.
16 Mar
16 Mar
1:01 p.m.
On 12 Feb 2014, at 02:41, Hernán Morales Durand <hernan.morales(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2014-02-10 10:32 GMT-03:00 Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com>om>:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:
As far as I know, nobody is maintaining Merlin anymore.
Agreed, but it has some nice support for creating dialogue boxes for user questions and
it is still an integral part of Moose interface.
Actually, I would not use it. Why not using Glamour or Spec?
Glamour provides only higher-level interfaces, hence basic widgets such as checkboxes and
radio buttons are difficult to embed.
For Spec, I don't know if we have such a domain-specific extension for user
dialogues.
After trying *very hard* getting Merling to work,
yes I was looking at it and this is why I propose a GSOC project
I've decided to build my own wizard dialogs using
Spec. Not a replacement but now I have some dialogs with previous & next buttons.
It would be good to share and see how we can build on top.
Cheers,
Hernán
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
3981
days inactive
4016
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Hernán Morales Durand -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Usman Bhatti