6:05 p.m.
Hi,
apparently we broke MorphicRoassalAdapter when cleaning Spec, I attached a
fix.
However my question is - does anybody (except us) actually use the
Roassal2Spec package? Because otherwise we could clean it a bit. For
example I'm not sure of the use case of script:/lastEvent:.
Peter
7:23 p.m.
Yes, I use it for LRP.
I instantiate a RoassalModel and then set the script, as below. Sometimes I redraw the
entire visualization by sending the refresh message to the RoassalModel instance. I don’t
do anything else, really (no idea what event and lastEvent is about).
treeview := self instantiate: RoassalModel.
treeview script: [:view :canvas | self buildTreeOnView: view ].
On Feb 28, 2015, at 14:05, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi,
apparently we broke MorphicRoassalAdapter when cleaning Spec, I attached a fix.
However my question is - does anybody (except us) actually use the Roassal2Spec package?
Because otherwise we could clean it a bit. For example I'm not sure of the use case of
script:/lastEvent:.
Peter
<Roassal2Spec-PeterUhnak.6.mcz>_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <---
Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry
PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
7:44 p.m.
For me it seems weird thet applyScript (refresh) destroys the view and
creates it again. Wouldn't it make more sense to expose the view on model
and then instead of refresh use cleanAll (RTView>>cleanAll)?
Or maybe we should just make a new Model/Adapter for our needs and leave
the Roassal's alone. :)
Peter
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Johan Fabry <jfabry(a)dcc.uchile.cl> wrote:
Yes, I use it for LRP.
I instantiate a RoassalModel and then set the script, as below. Sometimes
I redraw the entire visualization by sending the refresh message to the
RoassalModel instance. I don’t do anything else, really (no idea what event
and lastEvent is about).
treeview := self instantiate: RoassalModel.
treeview script: [:view :canvas | self buildTreeOnView: view ].
On Feb 28, 2015, at 14:05, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
apparently we broke MorphicRoassalAdapter when cleaning Spec, I attached a
fix.
However my question is - does anybody (except us) actually use the
Roassal2Spec package? Because otherwise we could clean it a bit. For
example I'm not sure of the use case of script:/lastEvent:.
Peter
<Roassal2Spec-PeterUhnak.6.mcz>
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <---
Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry
PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
9:23 p.m.
I don’t know what’s best right now. I think I should sit together with Alex for a bit, so
we can talk about it and produce a cleaner version.
I think that for now we can leave it alone, just make sure that it keeps working and you
add a bug report so that Alex and I can look at it when we can find some time to sit
together.
On Feb 28, 2015, at 15:44, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
For me it seems weird thet applyScript (refresh) destroys the view and creates it again.
Wouldn't it make more sense to expose the view on model and then instead of refresh
use cleanAll (RTView>>cleanAll)?
Or maybe we should just make a new Model/Adapter for our needs and leave the
Roassal's alone. :)
Peter
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Johan Fabry <jfabry(a)dcc.uchile.cl
<mailto:jfabry@dcc.uchile.cl>> wrote:
Yes, I use it for LRP.
I instantiate a RoassalModel and then set the script, as below. Sometimes I redraw the
entire visualization by sending the refresh message to the RoassalModel instance. I don’t
do anything else, really (no idea what event and lastEvent is about).
treeview := self instantiate: RoassalModel.
treeview script: [:view :canvas | self buildTreeOnView: view ].
> On Feb 28, 2015, at 14:05, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com
<mailto:i.uhnak@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> apparently we broke MorphicRoassalAdapter when cleaning Spec, I attached a fix.
>
> However my question is - does anybody (except us) actually use the Roassal2Spec
package? Because otherwise we could clean it a bit. For example I'm not sure of the
use case of script:/lastEvent:.
>
> Peter
> <Roassal2Spec-PeterUhnak.6.mcz>_______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch <mailto:Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch>
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
<https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev>
---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <http://emailcharter.org/>
<---
Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry <http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry>
PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch <mailto:Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
<https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev>
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <---
Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry
PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
10:28 p.m.
Ok.
The fix I sent in the first mail seems to work also for the refresh.
We can change the model/adapter once the "proper" way is decided for Spec.
Peter
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Johan Fabry <jfabry(a)dcc.uchile.cl> wrote:
I don’t know what’s best right now. I think I should sit together with
Alex for a bit, so we can talk about it and produce a cleaner version.
I think that for now we can leave it alone, just make sure that it keeps
working and you add a bug report so that Alex and I can look at it when we
can find some time to sit together.
On Feb 28, 2015, at 15:44, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote:
For me it seems weird thet applyScript (refresh) destroys the view and
creates it again. Wouldn't it make more sense to expose the view on model
and then instead of refresh use cleanAll (RTView>>cleanAll)?
Or maybe we should just make a new Model/Adapter for our needs and leave
the Roassal's alone. :)
Peter
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Johan Fabry <jfabry(a)dcc.uchile.cl> wrote:
>
> Yes, I use it for LRP.
>
> I instantiate a RoassalModel and then set the script, as below. Sometimes
> I redraw the entire visualization by sending the refresh message to the
> RoassalModel instance. I don’t do anything else, really (no idea what event
> and lastEvent is about).
>
> treeview := self instantiate: RoassalModel.
> treeview script: [:view :canvas | self buildTreeOnView: view ].
>
>
>
> On Feb 28, 2015, at 14:05, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> apparently we broke MorphicRoassalAdapter when cleaning Spec, I attached
> a fix.
>
> However my question is - does anybody (except us) actually use the
> Roassal2Spec package? Because otherwise we could clean it a bit. For
> example I'm not sure of the use case of script:/lastEvent:.
>
> Peter
> <Roassal2Spec-PeterUhnak.6.mcz>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
>
>
> ---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <---
>
> Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry
> PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <---
Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry
PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
6:24 p.m.
On 28 February 2015 at 18:44, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote:
For me it seems weird thet applyScript (refresh) destroys the view
and
creates it again. Wouldn't it make more sense to expose the view on model
and then instead of refresh use cleanAll (RTView>>cleanAll)?
How can I use the same RTView? (instead of destroying each time).
Or maybe we should just make a new Model/Adapter for our needs and
leave the
Roassal's alone. :)
Peter
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Johan Fabry <jfabry(a)dcc.uchile.cl> wrote:
>
>
> Yes, I use it for LRP.
>
> I instantiate a RoassalModel and then set the script, as below. Sometimes
> I redraw the entire visualization by sending the refresh message to the
> RoassalModel instance. I don’t do anything else, really (no idea what event
> and lastEvent is about).
>
> treeview := self instantiate: RoassalModel.
> treeview script: [:view :canvas | self buildTreeOnView: view ].
>
>
>
> On Feb 28, 2015, at 14:05, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> apparently we broke MorphicRoassalAdapter when cleaning Spec, I attached a
> fix.
>
> However my question is - does anybody (except us) actually use the
> Roassal2Spec package? Because otherwise we could clean it a bit. For example
> I'm not sure of the use case of script:/lastEvent:.
>
> Peter
>
> <Roassal2Spec-PeterUhnak.6.mcz>_______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
>
>
> ---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <---
>
> Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry
> PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
9:50 a.m.
On 10/16, Peter H. Meadows wrote:
On 28 February 2015 at 18:44, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> For me it seems weird thet applyScript (refresh) destroys the view and
> creates it again. Wouldn't it make more sense to expose the view on model
> and then instead of refresh use cleanAll (RTView>>cleanAll)?
>
How can I use the same RTView? (instead of destroying each time).
What I've done for my purposes is subclass RoassalModel and extract
the variable.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
RoassalModel subclass: #MyRoassalModel
instanceVariableNames: 'roassalView'
classVariableNames: ''
package: 'MyPackage'
MyRoassalModel>>initialize
super initialize.
self script: [ :view :canvas |
roassalView := view
]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It's ugly (extracting vars out of block), but I never got around to
making a proper solution.
> Or maybe we should just make a new Model/Adapter for our needs and leave the
> Roassal's alone. :)
>
> Peter
>
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Johan Fabry <jfabry(a)dcc.uchile.cl> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Yes, I use it for LRP.
>>
>> I instantiate a RoassalModel and then set the script, as below. Sometimes
>> I redraw the entire visualization by sending the refresh message to the
>> RoassalModel instance. I don’t do anything else, really (no idea what event
>> and lastEvent is about).
>>
>> treeview := self instantiate: RoassalModel.
>> treeview script: [:view :canvas | self buildTreeOnView: view ].
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 28, 2015, at 14:05, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> apparently we broke MorphicRoassalAdapter when cleaning Spec, I attached a
>> fix.
>>
>> However my question is - does anybody (except us) actually use the
>> Roassal2Spec package? Because otherwise we could clean it a bit. For example
>> I'm not sure of the use case of script:/lastEvent:.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
<Roassal2Spec-PeterUhnak.6.mcz>_______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <---
>>
>> Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry
>> PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Peter
1:36 p.m.
I think this is the only way to do it
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Dec 1, 2015, at 5:50 AM, Peter Uhnak <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 10/16, Peter H. Meadows wrote:
> On 28 February 2015 at 18:44, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> For me it seems weird thet applyScript (refresh) destroys the view and
>> creates it again. Wouldn't it make more sense to expose the view on model
>> and then instead of refresh use cleanAll (RTView>>cleanAll)?
>>
>
> How can I use the same RTView? (instead of destroying each time).
What I've done for my purposes is subclass RoassalModel and extract
the variable.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
RoassalModel subclass: #MyRoassalModel
instanceVariableNames: 'roassalView'
classVariableNames: ''
package: 'MyPackage'
MyRoassalModel>>initialize
super initialize.
self script: [ :view :canvas |
roassalView := view
]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It's ugly (extracting vars out of block), but I never got around to
making a proper solution.
>
>> Or maybe we should just make a new Model/Adapter for our needs and leave the
>> Roassal's alone. :)
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Johan Fabry <jfabry(a)dcc.uchile.cl> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, I use it for LRP.
>>>
>>> I instantiate a RoassalModel and then set the script, as below. Sometimes
>>> I redraw the entire visualization by sending the refresh message to the
>>> RoassalModel instance. I don’t do anything else, really (no idea what event
>>> and lastEvent is about).
>>>
>>> treeview := self instantiate: RoassalModel.
>>> treeview script: [:view :canvas | self buildTreeOnView: view ].
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 28, 2015, at 14:05, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> apparently we broke MorphicRoassalAdapter when cleaning Spec, I attached a
>>> fix.
>>>
>>> However my question is - does anybody (except us) actually use the
>>> Roassal2Spec package? Because otherwise we could clean it a bit. For example
>>> I'm not sure of the use case of script:/lastEvent:.
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
<Roassal2Spec-PeterUhnak.6.mcz>_______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <---
>>>
>>> Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry
>>> PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Peter
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
2929
days inactive
3207
days old
7 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Johan Fabry -
Peter H. Meadows -
Peter Uhnak -
Peter Uhnák