Dear SqMoose friends,
i was wondering whether Moose-All is necessary since we have MooseLoader. The dependencies defined on Moose-All could be made explicit said in MooseLoader.
Cheers, Alexandre
On 20 févr. 09, at 14:41, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Dear SqMoose friends,
i was wondering whether Moose-All is necessary since we have MooseLoader. The dependencies defined on Moose-All could be made explicit said in MooseLoader.
You still need MooseAll to make a single save of the multiple packages of Moose. Not sure you can do that with the installer.
-- Simon
Dear SqMoose friends,
i was wondering whether Moose-All is necessary since we have MooseLoader. The dependencies defined on Moose-All could be made explicit said in MooseLoader.
You still need MooseAll to make a single save of the multiple packages of Moose. Not sure you can do that with the installer.
Ah yes, sorry. But I would expect one to save different package independently no ? Usually, I set a different comment for each package I save.
Alexandre
On 20 févr. 09, at 14:53, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Dear SqMoose friends,
i was wondering whether Moose-All is necessary since we have MooseLoader. The dependencies defined on Moose-All could be made explicit said in MooseLoader.
You still need MooseAll to make a single save of the multiple packages of Moose. Not sure you can do that with the installer.
Ah yes, sorry. But I would expect one to save different package independently no ? Usually, I set a different comment for each package I save.
Porting Moose to Squeak sometimes implies modifying multiple packages at the same times, moving methods between packages, changing the importer and the model and the tests... Besides I still get one comment window for each package saved with MooseAll, so I can still write a particular comment for each package if necessary.
-- Simon
Ok, thanks. It makes sense
Alexandre
On 20 Feb 2009, at 15:07, Simon Denier wrote:
On 20 févr. 09, at 14:53, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Dear SqMoose friends,
i was wondering whether Moose-All is necessary since we have MooseLoader. The dependencies defined on Moose-All could be made explicit said in MooseLoader.
You still need MooseAll to make a single save of the multiple packages of Moose. Not sure you can do that with the installer.
Ah yes, sorry. But I would expect one to save different package independently no ? Usually, I set a different comment for each package I save.
Porting Moose to Squeak sometimes implies modifying multiple packages at the same times, moving methods between packages, changing the importer and the model and the tests... Besides I still get one comment window for each package saved with MooseAll, so I can still write a particular comment for each package if necessary.
-- Simon
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
no we should not save the package independently
On Feb 20, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Dear SqMoose friends,
i was wondering whether Moose-All is necessary since we have MooseLoader. The dependencies defined on Moose-All could be made explicit said in MooseLoader.
You still need MooseAll to make a single save of the multiple packages of Moose. Not sure you can do that with the installer.
Ah yes, sorry. But I would expect one to save different package independently no ? Usually, I set a different comment for each package I save.
Alexandre
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Simon Denier -
Stéphane Ducasse