FAMIXFunction>>packageScope is missing

List overview All Threads
Download

newer

older

reworking the petit browser

Exception Handling in the Moose...

Alexandre Bergel

9 Dec 2011 9 Dec '11

5:21 p.m.

Hi! We are importing C++ code in Moose and are bumping into problem when using Chef. packageScope is missing on FAMIXFunction. We could have something like: FAMIXFunction>>packageScope ^ self declatedType ifNotNil: [ self declatedType packageScope ] ifNil: [ nil ] Any better idea? Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Show replies by date

Tudor Girba

9 Dec 9 Dec

5:38 p.m.

*scope methods are supposed to return a scope of the entity, and not a dependency. Declared type is a dependency, so it does not fit the purpose. But, how are you importing c++? Cheers, Doru On Dec 9, 2011, at 17:21, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:

...

Santiago Vidal

5:41 p.m.

We are importing MSE files generated with inFusion. Cheers, Santiago 2011/12/9 Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>

...

Hi! We are importing C++ code in Moose and are bumping into problem when

using Chef.

packageScope is missing on FAMIXFunction. We could have something like: FAMIXFunction>>packageScope ^ self declatedType ifNotNil: [ self declatedType packageScope ] ifNil: [ nil ] Any better idea? Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- Santiago Vidal

Alexandre Bergel

7:41 p.m.

...

*scope methods are supposed to return a scope of the entity, and not a dependency. Declared type is a dependency, so it does not fit the purpose.

I inspired myself from: FAMIXMethod>>packageScope ^ self parentPackage ifNil:[ |cl| cl := self parentType. cl isNil ifTrue:[nil] ifFalse:[cl packageScope] ] So, what the definition of FAMIXFunction>>packageScope should look like? Cheers, Alexandre

...

On Dec 9, 2011, at 17:21, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:

_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Tudor Girba

9:36 p.m.

Hi, On 9 Dec 2011, at 19:41, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

...

*scope methods are supposed to return a scope of the entity, and not a dependency. Declared type is a dependency, so it does not fit the purpose.

I inspired myself from: FAMIXMethod>>packageScope ^ self parentPackage ifNil:[ |cl| cl := self parentType. cl isNil ifTrue:[nil] ifFalse:[cl packageScope] ]

But, this is completely not the same as what you proposed for function. packageScope returns the parentPackage of the parent class. If you look for the parentPackage of what the function returns, you end up in a completely different place.

...

So, what the definition of FAMIXFunction>>packageScope should look like?

There is no notion of packageScope for a Function, so it should return nil in this case. Cheers, Doru

...

Cheers, Alexandre

On Dec 9, 2011, at 17:21, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:

_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- www.tudorgirba.com Innovation comes in least expected form. That is, if it is expected, it already happened.

Alexandre Bergel

11 Dec 11 Dec

9:59 p.m.

...

So, what the definition of FAMIXFunction>>packageScope should look like?

There is no notion of packageScope for a Function, so it should return nil in this case.

I added -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= FAMIXFunction>>packageScope "No package scope for functions" ^ nil -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= in Famix-Core-AlexandreBergel.188 This could always be adjusted in the future when one need to analyze languages that has scoped function (e.g., Racket) Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

4765

days inactive

4767

days old

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

Manage subscription

5 comments

3 participants

tags (0)

participants (3)

Alexandre Bergel
Santiago Vidal
Tudor Girba