8 Oct
2010
8 Oct
'10
3:11 p.m.
On 8 oct. 2010, at 15:05, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi!
The following returns false.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| m c|
m := FAMIXMethod new.
c := FAMIXClass new.
(FAMIXReference new source: m; target: c) = (FAMIXReference new source: m; target: c)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Is it a bug or a feature?
As Guillermo pointed out, this is an odd behavior.
One FamixReference represents one reference from within a method to a class, and there can
be multiple such references from a single method to the same class. So, this is expected.
That said, there is no way right now to create two FamixReferences to represent the same
entity in code, but does it make sense?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon
8 Oct
8 Oct
3:15 p.m.
New subject: equality of famix references
That said, there is no way right now to create two
FamixReferences to represent the same entity in code, but does it make sense?
Did not understand ... ?
2 references representing the same entity?
A reference is not an entity?
As for Alex question, I would agree with Simon: It might be usefull to
know that a method makes 1 or 10 different references to the same
other entity.
I believe verveineJ does it that way (I didn't check).
nicolas
--
Nicolas Anquetil Univ. Lille1 / INRIA-equipe RMod
3:49 p.m.
New subject: equality of famix references
As for Alex question, I would agree with Simon: It
might be usefull to
know that a method makes 1 or 10 different references to the same
other entity.
Yeah sorry for my question. What you said make sense. It is still early in the morning
here :-)
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
5189
days inactive
5189
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Nicolas Anquetil -
Simon Denier