Oops, forgot reply all.
On 26 Sep 2007, at 23:53 , Adrian Kuhn wrote:
On 26 Sep 2007, at 18:30 , Tudor Girba wrote:
As for Meta and Hapax, Adrian said that he reserves the right to license them and that we should discuss about it after we get the agreement with the Unibe. But, in a follow up mail he changed his mind and said that "if we come to some nice agreement with Univ its okay to license these two bundles under BSD". I must admit that I am a bit confused, but perhaps this was just another misunderstanding :)
It is the same I wrote in my mail back then
All these are issues I'd like to be addresses and taken into account when officially (re)licensing Moose now. Personally I would prefer to have a license that allows us to be more specific about what we consider to be fair use. But I am not strictly against BSD as well, it would be even okay for me to license Meta as such if we find to some agreement that ensures fairness for all involved parties
and that still applies.
AA
Dear list members,
please apologize confusion by the previous mail. By mistake I sent an internal mail to the wrong mailing list. We (that is the Moose Association) are in the process of getting official University agreement for licensing Moose as open-source platform, see
http://smallwiki.unibe.ch/moose/association/
For all those that have already applied for membership, I will come back on you as soon as I have set up the account.
For all those that have not yet applied, you are welcome to do so :) just drop me a mail.
cheers, AA
-
Adrian Kuhn