New subject: [Moose] Re: summary of the discussion with Adrian

27 Sep 2007

Oops, forgot reply all.

On 26 Sep 2007, at 23:53 , Adrian Kuhn wrote:

...
  On 26 Sep 2007, at 18:30 , Tudor Girba wrote:

  As for Meta and Hapax, Adrian said that he
reserves the right to
 license them and that we should discuss about it after we get the
 agreement with the Unibe. But, in a follow up mail he changed his
 mind and said that "if we come to some nice agreement with Univ its
 okay to license these two bundles under BSD". I must admit that I am
 a bit confused, but perhaps this was just another misunderstanding :) 
 It is the same I wrote in my mail back then

  All these are issues I'd like to be addresses
and taken into account
 when officially (re)licensing Moose now. Personally I would prefer to
 have a license that allows us to be more specific about what we
 consider to be fair use. But I am not strictly against BSD as well,
 it would be even okay for me to license Meta as such if we find to
 some agreement that ensures fairness for all involved parties 
 and that still applies.

 AA

Re: [Moose] Re: summary of the discussion with Adrian