Hi Romain,

I got your question wrong. That's why the #sorted: in SequenceableCollection is returning a sorted copy of your collection, and does not modify the original collection.

Ricky

On Apr 16, 2008, at 12:43 PM, Romain PEIRS wrote:

Hi Ricky,

Thanks for your answer. But my problem is that my collection is not sorted after this kind of message: aCollection sorted: [:e1 :e2 | e1 staticNeededPackages size < e2 staticNeededPackages size] I don't really understand why!

Cheers

Romain

-----Message d'origine----- De : Richard Wettel [mailto:richard.wettel@lu.unisi.ch] Envoyé : mercredi 16 avril 2008 12:15 À : peirsro@ensieta.fr; Related to the development of Moose and other related tools Objet : Re: [Moose-dev] Does the message sorted: in the method MooseModel>>packagesDSM do anything?

Hi Romain,

#sorted: expects a block with 2 arguments, such as: aCollection sorted: [:e1 :e2 | e1 staticNeededPackages size < e2 staticNeededPackages size] which will sort the elements ascending. For more examples, just search for the senders of the selector #sorted:

Cheers, Ricky

On Apr 16, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Romain PEIRS wrote:

...

Hi everybody !

I’m working on the method MooseModel >> packagesDSM and I noticed that the message sorted: sent to an OrderedCollection doesn’t sort anything! I also tried with a simple condition of sort: p1staticNeededPackages size

...

p2staticNeededPackages size

I don’t understand why the OrderedCollection is not sorted. Have I forgot anything?

Thanks

Romain

---

Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

---

Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev