28 Jul
2016
28 Jul
'16
1:19 p.m.
Dear all,
I have now a travis job running for Moose here:
https://travis-ci.org/moosetechnology/Moose/jobs/147971040
with the same tests than on Jenkins:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/
But strangely, there is some errors on the travis job that do not
appear on Jenkins.
listBackgroundColor message is send to Pharo3Theme, but there is no
message like that in Pharo 5.0 …
Any ideas why ?
--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
28 Jul
28 Jul
8:19 p.m.
No idea why. Do you have the same base image?
Anyway, having moose on travis is interesting. What does it bring more than Jenkins? Just
wondering.
Alexandre
On Jul 28, 2016, at 7:19 AM, Serge Stinckwich
<serge.stinckwich(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Dear all,
I have now a travis job running for Moose here:
https://travis-ci.org/moosetechnology/Moose/jobs/147971040
with the same tests than on Jenkins:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/
But strangely, there is some errors on the travis job that do not
appear on Jenkins.
listBackgroundColor message is send to Pharo3Theme, but there is no
message like that in Pharo 5.0 …
Any ideas why ?
--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
10:08 p.m.
Le 28/7/16 à 20:19, Alexandre Bergel a écrit :
No idea why. Do you have the same base image?
Anyway, having moose on travis is interesting. What does it bring more than Jenkins? Just
wondering.
integration with git.
since there is a free online service no need to have inria like service.
Stef
Alexandre
On Jul 28, 2016, at 7:19 AM, Serge Stinckwich
<serge.stinckwich(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Dear all,
I have now a travis job running for Moose here:
https://travis-ci.org/moosetechnology/Moose/jobs/147971040
with the same tests than on Jenkins:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/
But strangely, there is some errors on the travis job that do not
appear on Jenkins.
listBackgroundColor message is send to Pharo3Theme, but there is no
message like that in Pharo 5.0 …
Any ideas why ?
--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
10:45 p.m.
Ok! Thanks!
Alexandre
On Jul 28, 2016, at 4:08 PM, stepharo
<stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote:
Le 28/7/16 à 20:19, Alexandre Bergel a écrit :
No idea why. Do you have the same base image?
Anyway, having moose on travis is interesting. What does it bring more than Jenkins? Just
wondering.
integration with git.
since there is a free online service no need to have inria like service.
Stef
Alexandre
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev On Jul 28, 2016, at 7:19 AM, Serge Stinckwich
<serge.stinckwich(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Dear all,
I have now a travis job running for Moose here:
https://travis-ci.org/moosetechnology/Moose/jobs/147971040
with the same tests than on Jenkins:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/
But strangely, there is some errors on the travis job that do not
appear on Jenkins.
listBackgroundColor message is send to Pharo3Theme, but there is no
message like that in Pharo 5.0 …
Any ideas why ?
--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
29 Jul
29 Jul
1:25 p.m.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:08 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote:
Le 28/7/16 à 20:19, Alexandre Bergel a écrit :
Yes this is the idea :-)
--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
No idea why. Do you have the same base image?
Anyway, having moose on travis is interesting. What does it bring more
than Jenkins? Just wondering.
integration with git.
since there is a free online service no need to have inria like service. 
28 Jul
28 Jul
11:27 p.m.
Moose build job loads more stuff than just Moose.
./pharo moose-6.0.image eval Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'Moose' project:
'Glamour'; package: 'ConfigurationOfGlamourCore'; load. Gofer new
smalltalkhubUser: 'Moose' project: 'GToolkit'; package:
'ConfigurationOfGTInspector'; package: 'ConfigurationOfGTInspectorCore';
package: 'ConfigurationOfGTSpotter'; package:
'ConfigurationOfGTPlayground'; package: 'ConfigurationOfGTPlaygroundCore';
package: 'ConfigurationOfGToolkit'; package:
'ConfigurationOfGToolkitCore'; package: 'ConfigurationOfGTEventRecorder';
load. Smalltalk snapshot: true andQuit: true.
./pharo moose-6.0.image config http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Moose/main
ConfigurationOfMoose --install=development
I don't know if that's the issue, but it might be worth looking into.
Btw if you are running travis job just because you need it as a baseline image, you can
use Moose directly with SmalltalkCI:
https://github.com/hpi-swa/smalltalkCI#list-of-supported-images
Peter
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 02:19:38PM -0400, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
No idea why. Do you have the same base image?
Anyway, having moose on travis is interesting. What does it bring more than Jenkins? Just
wondering.
Alexandre
On Jul 28, 2016, at 7:19 AM, Serge Stinckwich
<serge.stinckwich(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Dear all,
I have now a travis job running for Moose here:
https://travis-ci.org/moosetechnology/Moose/jobs/147971040
with the same tests than on Jenkins:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/
But strangely, there is some errors on the travis job that do not
appear on Jenkins.
listBackgroundColor message is send to Pharo3Theme, but there is no
message like that in Pharo 5.0 …
Any ideas why ?
--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
29 Jul
29 Jul
2:11 p.m.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Peter Uhnak <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Moose build job loads more stuff than just Moose.
./pharo moose-6.0.image eval Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'Moose' project:
'Glamour'; package: 'ConfigurationOfGlamourCore'; load. Gofer new
smalltalkhubUser: 'Moose' project: 'GToolkit'; package:
'ConfigurationOfGTInspector'; package: 'ConfigurationOfGTInspectorCore';
package: 'ConfigurationOfGTSpotter'; package:
'ConfigurationOfGTPlayground'; package: 'ConfigurationOfGTPlaygroundCore';
package: 'ConfigurationOfGToolkit'; package:
'ConfigurationOfGToolkitCore'; package: 'ConfigurationOfGTEventRecorder';
load. Smalltalk snapshot: true andQuit: true.
./pharo moose-6.0.image config http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Moose/main
ConfigurationOfMoose --install=development
I don't know if that's the issue, but it might be worth looking into.
yes you are right ... Why the MOOSE Configuration is not loading everything ?
Btw if you are running travis job just because you
need it as a baseline image, you can use Moose directly with SmalltalkCI:
https://github.com/hpi-swa/smalltalkCI#list-of-supported-images
Yes I know, but here I try to build MOOSE image:
https://github.com/moosetechnology/Moose
--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
3067
days inactive
3068
days old
6 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Peter Uhnak -
Serge Stinckwich -
stepharo