happy man...

List overview All Threads
Download

newer

older

petit git log paser

Fwd: petit question

Alexandre Bergel

23 Sep 2011 23 Sep '11

2:08 p.m.

Hi ! Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time. Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the code if you wish. Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Show replies by date

Tudor Girba

23 Sep 23 Sep

2:14 p.m.

Would you want to provide the code as open source? Doru On 23 Sep 2011, at 14:08, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

...

-- www.tudorgirba.com "When people care, great things can happen."

Usman Bhatti

2:30 p.m.

Thats cool. Yeah, I would like to have a look at the code. When considered candidates for extracting C# program information, I considered CCI but then Mono.Cecil seemed more reasonable. But I would like to have a look at the code to compare the two implementations, as I haven't programmed in CCI since my PhD days. thanx Usman On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:

...

Would you want to provide the code as open source? Doru On 23 Sep 2011, at 14:08, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

Hi ! Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate

.mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.

Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I

can share the code if you wish.

Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- www.tudorgirba.com "When people care, great things can happen." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Stéphane Ducasse

2:46 p.m.

what model did you extract? inside methods? symbol resolved? because get package, class and inheritance should be simple. On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

...

Stéphane Ducasse

27 Sep 27 Sep

9:49 a.m.

alex can you reply? Stef On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

...

what model did you extract? inside methods? symbol resolved? because get package, class and inheritance should be simple. On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Alexandre Bergel

7:42 p.m.

Sorry, I missed this email We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract. Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite expressive. Alexandre On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

...

alex can you reply? Stef On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

what model did you extract? inside methods? symbol resolved? because get package, class and inheritance should be simple. On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Stéphane Ducasse

28 Sep 28 Sep

8:04 a.m.

On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

...

But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis? what is the license of CCI?

...

Alexandre On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

alex can you reply? Stef On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

what model did you extract? inside methods? symbol resolved? because get package, class and inheritance should be simple. On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Alexandre Bergel

1:25 p.m.

CCI does not operate on the AST, but on the symbols and bytecodes. Alexandre On 28 Sep 2011, at 03:04, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

...

On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis? what is the license of CCI?

Alexandre On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

alex can you reply? Stef On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

what model did you extract? inside methods? symbol resolved? because get package, class and inheritance should be simple. On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > Hi ! > > Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time. > > Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the code if you wish. > > Cheers, > Alexandre > > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Usman Bhatti

1:30 p.m.

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr

...

wrote:

...

On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

Sorry, I missed this email We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their

invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.

Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite

expressive. But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis? what is the license of CCI?

...

From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license

Comparison of the two frameworks: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and… + Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant ..

...

generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.

>>> >>> Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the

data. I can share the code if you wish.

> > Cheers, > Alexandre > > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Usman Bhatti

1:31 p.m.

...

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse < stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:

On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

Sorry, I missed this email We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their

invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.

Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite

expressive. But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis? what is the license of CCI?

CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries to manipulate MSIL (i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create static analyzers with these tools. Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license Comparison of the two frameworks: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and… + Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant ..

generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.

>>> >>> Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the

data. I can share the code if you wish.

>> >> Cheers, >> Alexandre >> >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Alexandre Bergel

2:25 p.m.

Weird. I sent the code the day you asked for it. Alexandre On 28 Sep 2011, at 08:31, Usman Bhatti wrote:

...

But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis? what is the license of CCI? CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries to manipulate MSIL (i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create static analyzers with these tools. Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license Comparison of the two frameworks: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and… + Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant ..

Alexandre On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

alex can you reply? Stef On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Alexandre Bergel

2:26 p.m.

I just sent the code to the mailing list. I will send it privately if it is not accepted by the list. Cheers, Alexandre On 28 Sep 2011, at 08:31, Usman Bhatti wrote:

...

Alexandre On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

alex can you reply? Stef On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Alexandre Bergel

2:42 p.m.

Apparently, gmail does not like my email. I put it on dropbox http://dl.dropbox.com/u/31543901/petomse.zip Cheers, Alexandre On 28 Sep 2011, at 09:26, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

...

I just sent the code to the mailing list. I will send it privately if it is not accepted by the list. Cheers, Alexandre On 28 Sep 2011, at 08:31, Usman Bhatti wrote:

Alexandre On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

alex can you reply? Stef On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > what model did you extract? > inside methods? > symbol resolved? > because get package, class and inheritance should be simple. > > > On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> Hi ! >> >> Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time. >> >> Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the code if you wish. >> >> Cheers, >> Alexandre >> >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Usman Bhatti

4:42 p.m.

tx On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>wrote;wrote:

...

Apparently, gmail does not like my email. I put it on dropbox http://dl.dropbox.com/u/31543901/petomse.zip Cheers, Alexandre On 28 Sep 2011, at 09:26, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

great ... just to compare the two implementations and learn a few lessons :-)

> > thanx > > Usman > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com>

wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <

stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:

> > On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> Sorry, I missed this email >> We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their

invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.

>> >> Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite

expressive.

> > But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis? > what is the license of CCI? > > CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries to

manipulate MSIL (i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create static analyzers with these tools.

> > Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) > From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license > > Comparison of the two frameworks: >

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and…

> + Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant .. > > > > > >> >> Alexandre >> >> >> On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> >>> alex can you reply? >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >>> >>>> what model did you extract? >>>> inside methods? >>>> symbol resolved? >>>> because get package, class and inheritance should be simple. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi ! >>>>> >>>>> Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to

generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.

>>>>> >>>>> Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the

data. I can share the code if you wish.

>>> >>> Cheers, >>> Alexandre >>> >>> >>> -- >>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Stéphane Ducasse

29 Sep 29 Sep

10:54 a.m.

Could we add all the code in a svn somewhere? Stef On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Usman Bhatti wrote:

...

tx On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote: Apparently, gmail does not like my email. I put it on dropbox http://dl.dropbox.com/u/31543901/petomse.zip Cheers, Alexandre On 28 Sep 2011, at 09:26, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

I just sent the code to the mailing list. I will send it privately if it is not accepted by the list. Cheers, Alexandre On 28 Sep 2011, at 08:31, Usman Bhatti wrote:

Alexandre On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > alex can you reply? > > Stef > > On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> what model did you extract? >> inside methods? >> symbol resolved? >> because get package, class and inheritance should be simple. >> >> >> On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> >>> Hi ! >>> >>> Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time. >>> >>> Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the code if you wish. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Alexandre >>> >>> >>> -- >>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Usman Bhatti

10 p.m.

ok i'll upload it somewhere ... On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Stéphane Ducasse < stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:

...

Could we add all the code in a svn somewhere? Stef On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Usman Bhatti wrote:

tx On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel <

alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:

Apparently, gmail does not like my email. I put it on dropbox http://dl.dropbox.com/u/31543901/petomse.zip Cheers, Alexandre On 28 Sep 2011, at 09:26, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > I just sent the code to the mailing list. > I will send it privately if it is not accepted by the list. > > Cheers, > Alexandre > > > On 28 Sep 2011, at 08:31, Usman Bhatti wrote: > >> Alex, >> >> If you could share the code that you create with MS guys, it would be

great ... just to compare the two implementations and learn a few lessons :-)

>> >> thanx >> >> Usman >> >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com>

wrote:

>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <

stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:

>> >> On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> >>> Sorry, I missed this email >>> We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and

their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.

>>> >>> Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite

expressive.

>> >> But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST

analysis?

>> what is the license of CCI? >> >> CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries

to manipulate MSIL (i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create static analyzers with these tools.

>> >> Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) >> From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license >> >> Comparison of the two frameworks: >>

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and…

>> + Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant .. >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> Alexandre >>> >>> >>> On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >>> >>>> alex can you reply? >>>> >>>> Stef >>>> >>>> On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >>>> >>>>> what model did you extract? >>>>> inside methods? >>>>> symbol resolved? >>>>> because get package, class and inheritance should be simple. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi ! >>>>>> >>>>>> Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to

generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.

>>>>>> >>>>>> Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the

data. I can share the code if you wish.

>>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Alexandre >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Usman Bhatti

9 Oct 9 Oct

12:55 p.m.

...

ok i'll upload it somewhere ... On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Stéphane Ducasse < stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:

Could we add all the code in a svn somewhere? Stef On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Usman Bhatti wrote:

tx On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel <

alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:

great ... just to compare the two implementations and learn a few lessons :-)

>> >> thanx >> >> Usman >> >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti <

usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <

stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:

>> >> On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> >>> Sorry, I missed this email >>> We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and

their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.

>>> >>> Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite

expressive.

>> >> But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST

analysis?

>> what is the license of CCI? >> >> CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries

>> >> Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) >> From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license >> >> Comparison of the two frameworks: >>

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and…

generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.

>>>>>> >>>>>> Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the

data. I can share the code if you wish.

>>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Alexandre >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Alexandre Bergel

10 Oct 10 Oct

3:03 p.m.

I like the idea, but we should be cautious. As you can see, the source are Microsoft copyrighted. Peli and I did this as a proof of concept and as an opportunity to code together. We did not talk about distributing it. I will talk to him about that. Alexandre On 9 Oct 2011, at 07:55, Usman Bhatti wrote:

...

I added the project here with some related info from the mail on the list. http://code.google.com/p/moosecciextractor/ If someone needs access, send me a mail. On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com> wrote: ok i'll upload it somewhere ... On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: Could we add all the code in a svn somewhere? Stef On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Usman Bhatti wrote:

I just sent the code to the mailing list. I will send it privately if it is not accepted by the list. Cheers, Alexandre On 28 Sep 2011, at 08:31, Usman Bhatti wrote:

Alex, If you could share the code that you create with MS guys, it would be great ... just to compare the two implementations and learn a few lessons :-) thanx Usman On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com> wrote: On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > Sorry, I missed this email > We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract. > > Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite expressive. But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis? what is the license of CCI? CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries to manipulate MSIL (i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create static analyzers with these tools. Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license Comparison of the two frameworks: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and… + Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant .. > > Alexandre > > > On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> alex can you reply? >> >> Stef >> >> On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> >>> what model did you extract? >>> inside methods? >>> symbol resolved? >>> because get package, class and inheritance should be simple. >>> >>> >>> On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >>> >>>> Hi ! >>>> >>>> Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time. >>>> >>>> Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the code if you wish. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Alexandre >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Usman Bhatti

4:02 p.m.

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>wrote;wrote:

...

Ok let me know, and I'll remove the code from the svn or make it private, if possible.

...

I will talk to him about that. Alexandre On 9 Oct 2011, at 07:55, Usman Bhatti wrote:

I added the project here with some related info from the mail on the

list.

http://code.google.com/p/moosecciextractor/ If someone needs access, send me a mail. On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com>

wrote:

ok i'll upload it somewhere ... On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <

stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:

Could we add all the code in a svn somewhere? Stef On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Usman Bhatti wrote: > tx > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel <

alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:

> Apparently, gmail does not like my email. I put it on dropbox > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/31543901/petomse.zip > > Cheers, > Alexandre > > > On 28 Sep 2011, at 09:26, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > > > I just sent the code to the mailing list. > > I will send it privately if it is not accepted by the list. > > > > Cheers, > > Alexandre > > > > > > On 28 Sep 2011, at 08:31, Usman Bhatti wrote: > > > >> Alex, > >> > >> If you could share the code that you create with MS guys, it would

be great ... just to compare the two implementations and learn a few lessons :-)

> >> > >> thanx > >> > >> Usman > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti <

usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <

stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:

> >> > >> On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> > >>> Sorry, I missed this email > >>> We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and

their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.

> >>> > >>> Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite

expressive.

> >> > >> But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST

analysis?

> >> what is the license of CCI? > >> > >> CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries

> >> > >> Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) > >> From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license > >> > >> Comparison of the two frameworks: > >>

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and…

> >> + Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant .. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Alexandre > >>> > >>> > >>> On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >>> > >>>> alex can you reply? > >>>> > >>>> Stef > >>>> > >>>> On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> what model did you extract? > >>>>> inside methods? > >>>>> symbol resolved? > >>>>> because get package, class and inheritance should be simple. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi ! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to

generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.

> >>>>>> > >>>>>> Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting

the data. I can share the code if you wish.

Alexandre Bergel

14 Oct 14 Oct

1:47 p.m.

There is no problem to turn the code into MIT. Usman, do you have time to fix the source files? I could do it else. Alexandre On 10 Oct 2011, at 11:02, Usman Bhatti wrote:

...

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote: I like the idea, but we should be cautious. As you can see, the source are Microsoft copyrighted. Peli and I did this as a proof of concept and as an opportunity to code together. We did not talk about distributing it. Ok let me know, and I'll remove the code from the svn or make it private, if possible. I will talk to him about that. Alexandre On 9 Oct 2011, at 07:55, Usman Bhatti wrote:

I just sent the code to the mailing list. I will send it privately if it is not accepted by the list. Cheers, Alexandre On 28 Sep 2011, at 08:31, Usman Bhatti wrote: > Alex, > > If you could share the code that you create with MS guys, it would be great ... just to compare the two implementations and learn a few lessons :-) > > thanx > > Usman > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> Sorry, I missed this email >> We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract. >> >> Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite expressive. > > But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis? > what is the license of CCI? > > CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries to manipulate MSIL (i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create static analyzers with these tools. > > Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) > From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license > > Comparison of the two frameworks: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and… > + Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant .. > > > > > >> >> Alexandre >> >> >> On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> >>> alex can you reply? >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >>> >>>> what model did you extract? >>>> inside methods? >>>> symbol resolved? >>>> because get package, class and inheritance should be simple. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi ! >>>>> >>>>> Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time. >>>>> >>>>> Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the code if you wish. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Alexandre >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Usman Bhatti

2:27 p.m.

Fixing source files = adding MIT headers? I can do it over the weekend. On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>wrote;wrote:

...

There is no problem to turn the code into MIT. Usman, do you have time to fix the source files? I could do it else. Alexandre On 10 Oct 2011, at 11:02, Usman Bhatti wrote:

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Alexandre Bergel <

alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:

I like the idea, but we should be cautious. As you can see, the source

are Microsoft copyrighted. Peli and I did this as a proof of concept and as an opportunity to code together. We did not talk about distributing it.

Ok let me know, and I'll remove the code from the svn or make it private,

if possible.

I will talk to him about that. Alexandre On 9 Oct 2011, at 07:55, Usman Bhatti wrote: > I added the project here with some related info from the mail on the

list.

> > http://code.google.com/p/moosecciextractor/ > > If someone needs access, send me a mail. > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com>

wrote:

> ok i'll upload it somewhere ... > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <

stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:

> Could we add all the code in a svn somewhere? > > Stef > > On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Usman Bhatti wrote: > > > tx > > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel <

alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:

> > Apparently, gmail does not like my email. I put it on dropbox > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/31543901/petomse.zip > > > > Cheers, > > Alexandre > > > > > > On 28 Sep 2011, at 09:26, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > > > > > I just sent the code to the mailing list. > > > I will send it privately if it is not accepted by the list. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Alexandre > > > > > > > > > On 28 Sep 2011, at 08:31, Usman Bhatti wrote: > > > > > >> Alex, > > >> > > >> If you could share the code that you create with MS guys, it would

be great ... just to compare the two implementations and learn a few lessons :-)

> > >> > > >> thanx > > >> > > >> Usman > > >> > > >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti <

usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> > >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <

stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:

> > >> > > >> On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > > >> > > >>> Sorry, I missed this email > > >>> We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and

their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.

> > >>> > > >>> Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite

expressive.

> > >> > > >> But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST

analysis?

> > >> what is the license of CCI? > > >> > > >> CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide

libraries to manipulate MSIL (i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create static analyzers with these tools.

> > >> > > >> Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) > > >> From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license > > >> > > >> Comparison of the two frameworks: > > >>

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and…

> > >> + Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant .. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> Alexandre > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> alex can you reply? > > >>>> > > >>>> Stef > > >>>> > > >>>> On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> what model did you extract? > > >>>>> inside methods? > > >>>>> symbol resolved? > > >>>>> because get package, class and inheritance should be simple. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Hi ! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft

to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.

> > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting

the data. I can share the code if you wish.

>>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> -- >>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Stéphane Ducasse

29 Sep 29 Sep

10:54 a.m.

Ok I got it. Stef On Sep 28, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti wrote:

...

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

Alexandre On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

alex can you reply? Stef On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

4818

days inactive

4839

days old

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

Manage subscription

21 comments

4 participants

tags (0)

participants (4)

Alexandre Bergel
Stéphane Ducasse
Tudor Girba
Usman Bhatti