Hi !
Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.
Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the code if you wish.
Cheers, Alexandre
Would you want to provide the code as open source?
Doru
On 23 Sep 2011, at 14:08, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi !
Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.
Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the code if you wish.
Cheers, Alexandre
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"When people care, great things can happen."
Thats cool. Yeah, I would like to have a look at the code. When considered candidates for extracting C# program information, I considered CCI but then Mono.Cecil seemed more reasonable. But I would like to have a look at the code to compare the two implementations, as I haven't programmed in CCI since my PhD days.
thanx
Usman
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com wrote:
Would you want to provide the code as open source?
Doru
On 23 Sep 2011, at 14:08, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi !
Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate
.mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.
Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I
can share the code if you wish.
Cheers, Alexandre
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"When people care, great things can happen."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
what model did you extract? inside methods? symbol resolved? because get package, class and inheritance should be simple.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi !
Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.
Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the code if you wish.
Cheers, Alexandre
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
alex can you reply?
Stef
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
what model did you extract? inside methods? symbol resolved? because get package, class and inheritance should be simple.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi !
Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.
Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the code if you wish.
Cheers, Alexandre
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Sorry, I missed this email We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.
Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite expressive.
Alexandre
On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
alex can you reply?
Stef
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
what model did you extract? inside methods? symbol resolved? because get package, class and inheritance should be simple.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi !
Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.
Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the code if you wish.
Cheers, Alexandre
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Sorry, I missed this email We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.
Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite expressive.
But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis? what is the license of CCI?
Alexandre
On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
alex can you reply?
Stef
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
what model did you extract? inside methods? symbol resolved? because get package, class and inheritance should be simple.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi !
Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.
Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the code if you wish.
Cheers, Alexandre
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
CCI does not operate on the AST, but on the symbols and bytecodes.
Alexandre
On 28 Sep 2011, at 03:04, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Sorry, I missed this email We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.
Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite expressive.
But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis? what is the license of CCI?
Alexandre
On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
alex can you reply?
Stef
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
what model did you extract? inside methods? symbol resolved? because get package, class and inheritance should be simple.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi !
Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.
Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the code if you wish.
Cheers, Alexandre
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr
wrote:
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Sorry, I missed this email We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their
invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.
Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite
expressive.
But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis? what is the license of CCI?
CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries to manipulate MSIL (i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create static analyzers with these tools.
Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL)
From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license
Comparison of the two frameworks: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and-... + Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant ..
Alexandre
On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
alex can you reply?
Stef
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
what model did you extract? inside methods? symbol resolved? because get package, class and inheritance should be simple.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi !
Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to
generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.
Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the
data. I can share the code if you wish.
Cheers, Alexandre
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Alex,
If you could share the code that you create with MS guys, it would be great ... just to compare the two implementations and learn a few lessons :-)
thanx
Usman
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse < stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Sorry, I missed this email We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their
invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.
Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite
expressive.
But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis? what is the license of CCI?
CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries to manipulate MSIL (i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create static analyzers with these tools.
Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license
Comparison of the two frameworks:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and-...
- Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant ..
Alexandre
On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
alex can you reply?
Stef
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
what model did you extract? inside methods? symbol resolved? because get package, class and inheritance should be simple.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi !
Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to
generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.
Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the
data. I can share the code if you wish.
Cheers, Alexandre
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Weird. I sent the code the day you asked for it.
Alexandre
On 28 Sep 2011, at 08:31, Usman Bhatti wrote:
Alex,
If you could share the code that you create with MS guys, it would be great ... just to compare the two implementations and learn a few lessons :-)
thanx
Usman
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse@inria.fr wrote:
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Sorry, I missed this email We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.
Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite expressive.
But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis? what is the license of CCI?
CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries to manipulate MSIL (i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create static analyzers with these tools.
Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license
Comparison of the two frameworks: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and-...
- Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant ..
Alexandre
On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
alex can you reply?
Stef
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
what model did you extract? inside methods? symbol resolved? because get package, class and inheritance should be simple.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi !
Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.
Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the code if you wish.
Cheers, Alexandre
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
I just sent the code to the mailing list. I will send it privately if it is not accepted by the list.
Cheers, Alexandre
On 28 Sep 2011, at 08:31, Usman Bhatti wrote:
Alex,
If you could share the code that you create with MS guys, it would be great ... just to compare the two implementations and learn a few lessons :-)
thanx
Usman
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse@inria.fr wrote:
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Sorry, I missed this email We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.
Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite expressive.
But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis? what is the license of CCI?
CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries to manipulate MSIL (i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create static analyzers with these tools.
Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license
Comparison of the two frameworks: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and-...
- Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant ..
Alexandre
On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
alex can you reply?
Stef
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
what model did you extract? inside methods? symbol resolved? because get package, class and inheritance should be simple.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi !
Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.
Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the code if you wish.
Cheers, Alexandre
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Apparently, gmail does not like my email. I put it on dropbox http://dl.dropbox.com/u/31543901/petomse.zip
Cheers, Alexandre
On 28 Sep 2011, at 09:26, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I just sent the code to the mailing list. I will send it privately if it is not accepted by the list.
Cheers, Alexandre
On 28 Sep 2011, at 08:31, Usman Bhatti wrote:
Alex,
If you could share the code that you create with MS guys, it would be great ... just to compare the two implementations and learn a few lessons :-)
thanx
Usman
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse@inria.fr wrote:
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Sorry, I missed this email We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.
Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite expressive.
But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis? what is the license of CCI?
CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries to manipulate MSIL (i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create static analyzers with these tools.
Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license
Comparison of the two frameworks: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and-...
- Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant ..
Alexandre
On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
alex can you reply?
Stef
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
what model did you extract? inside methods? symbol resolved? because get package, class and inheritance should be simple.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi !
Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.
Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the code if you wish.
Cheers, Alexandre
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
tx
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.comwrote:
Apparently, gmail does not like my email. I put it on dropbox http://dl.dropbox.com/u/31543901/petomse.zip
Cheers, Alexandre
On 28 Sep 2011, at 09:26, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I just sent the code to the mailing list. I will send it privately if it is not accepted by the list.
Cheers, Alexandre
On 28 Sep 2011, at 08:31, Usman Bhatti wrote:
Alex,
If you could share the code that you create with MS guys, it would be
great ... just to compare the two implementations and learn a few lessons :-)
thanx
Usman
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <
stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Sorry, I missed this email We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their
invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.
Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite
expressive.
But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis? what is the license of CCI?
CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries to
manipulate MSIL (i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create static analyzers with these tools.
Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license
Comparison of the two frameworks:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and-...
- Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant ..
Alexandre
On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
alex can you reply?
Stef
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
what model did you extract? inside methods? symbol resolved? because get package, class and inheritance should be simple.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
> Hi ! > > Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to
generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.
> > Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the
data. I can share the code if you wish.
> > Cheers, > Alexandre > > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Could we add all the code in a svn somewhere?
Stef
On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Usman Bhatti wrote:
tx
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com wrote: Apparently, gmail does not like my email. I put it on dropbox http://dl.dropbox.com/u/31543901/petomse.zip
Cheers, Alexandre
On 28 Sep 2011, at 09:26, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I just sent the code to the mailing list. I will send it privately if it is not accepted by the list.
Cheers, Alexandre
On 28 Sep 2011, at 08:31, Usman Bhatti wrote:
Alex,
If you could share the code that you create with MS guys, it would be great ... just to compare the two implementations and learn a few lessons :-)
thanx
Usman
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse@inria.fr wrote:
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Sorry, I missed this email We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.
Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite expressive.
But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis? what is the license of CCI?
CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries to manipulate MSIL (i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create static analyzers with these tools.
Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license
Comparison of the two frameworks: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and-...
- Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant ..
Alexandre
On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
alex can you reply?
Stef
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
what model did you extract? inside methods? symbol resolved? because get package, class and inheritance should be simple.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
> Hi ! > > Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time. > > Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the code if you wish. > > Cheers, > Alexandre > > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
ok i'll upload it somewhere ...
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Stéphane Ducasse < stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Could we add all the code in a svn somewhere?
Stef
On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Usman Bhatti wrote:
tx
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel <
alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:
Apparently, gmail does not like my email. I put it on dropbox http://dl.dropbox.com/u/31543901/petomse.zip
Cheers, Alexandre
On 28 Sep 2011, at 09:26, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I just sent the code to the mailing list. I will send it privately if it is not accepted by the list.
Cheers, Alexandre
On 28 Sep 2011, at 08:31, Usman Bhatti wrote:
Alex,
If you could share the code that you create with MS guys, it would be
great ... just to compare the two implementations and learn a few lessons :-)
thanx
Usman
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <
stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Sorry, I missed this email We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and
their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.
Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite
expressive.
But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST
analysis?
what is the license of CCI?
CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries
to manipulate MSIL (i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create static analyzers with these tools.
Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license
Comparison of the two frameworks:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and-...
- Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant ..
Alexandre
On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
alex can you reply?
Stef
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> what model did you extract? > inside methods? > symbol resolved? > because get package, class and inheritance should be simple. > > > On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> Hi ! >> >> Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to
generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.
>> >> Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the
data. I can share the code if you wish.
>> >> Cheers, >> Alexandre >> >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
I added the project here with some related info from the mail on the list.
http://code.google.com/p/moosecciextractor/
If someone needs access, send me a mail.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.comwrote:
ok i'll upload it somewhere ...
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Stéphane Ducasse < stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Could we add all the code in a svn somewhere?
Stef
On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Usman Bhatti wrote:
tx
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel <
alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:
Apparently, gmail does not like my email. I put it on dropbox http://dl.dropbox.com/u/31543901/petomse.zip
Cheers, Alexandre
On 28 Sep 2011, at 09:26, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I just sent the code to the mailing list. I will send it privately if it is not accepted by the list.
Cheers, Alexandre
On 28 Sep 2011, at 08:31, Usman Bhatti wrote:
Alex,
If you could share the code that you create with MS guys, it would be
great ... just to compare the two implementations and learn a few lessons :-)
thanx
Usman
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti <
usman.bhatti@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <
stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Sorry, I missed this email We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and
their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.
Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite
expressive.
But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST
analysis?
what is the license of CCI?
CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries
to manipulate MSIL (i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create static analyzers with these tools.
Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license
Comparison of the two frameworks:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and-...
- Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant ..
Alexandre
On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> alex can you reply? > > Stef > > On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> what model did you extract? >> inside methods? >> symbol resolved? >> because get package, class and inheritance should be simple. >> >> >> On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> >>> Hi ! >>> >>> Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to
generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.
>>> >>> Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the
data. I can share the code if you wish.
>>> >>> Cheers, >>> Alexandre >>> >>> >>> -- >>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
I like the idea, but we should be cautious. As you can see, the source are Microsoft copyrighted. Peli and I did this as a proof of concept and as an opportunity to code together. We did not talk about distributing it.
I will talk to him about that.
Alexandre
On 9 Oct 2011, at 07:55, Usman Bhatti wrote:
I added the project here with some related info from the mail on the list.
http://code.google.com/p/moosecciextractor/
If someone needs access, send me a mail.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote: ok i'll upload it somewhere ...
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse@inria.fr wrote: Could we add all the code in a svn somewhere?
Stef
On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Usman Bhatti wrote:
tx
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com wrote: Apparently, gmail does not like my email. I put it on dropbox http://dl.dropbox.com/u/31543901/petomse.zip
Cheers, Alexandre
On 28 Sep 2011, at 09:26, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I just sent the code to the mailing list. I will send it privately if it is not accepted by the list.
Cheers, Alexandre
On 28 Sep 2011, at 08:31, Usman Bhatti wrote:
Alex,
If you could share the code that you create with MS guys, it would be great ... just to compare the two implementations and learn a few lessons :-)
thanx
Usman
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse@inria.fr wrote:
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Sorry, I missed this email We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.
Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite expressive.
But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis? what is the license of CCI?
CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries to manipulate MSIL (i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create static analyzers with these tools.
Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license
Comparison of the two frameworks: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and-...
- Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant ..
Alexandre
On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
alex can you reply?
Stef
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> what model did you extract? > inside methods? > symbol resolved? > because get package, class and inheritance should be simple. > > > On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> Hi ! >> >> Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time. >> >> Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the code if you wish. >> >> Cheers, >> Alexandre >> >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.comwrote:
I like the idea, but we should be cautious. As you can see, the source are Microsoft copyrighted. Peli and I did this as a proof of concept and as an opportunity to code together. We did not talk about distributing it.
Ok let me know, and I'll remove the code from the svn or make it private, if possible.
I will talk to him about that.
Alexandre
On 9 Oct 2011, at 07:55, Usman Bhatti wrote:
I added the project here with some related info from the mail on the
list.
http://code.google.com/p/moosecciextractor/
If someone needs access, send me a mail.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com
wrote:
ok i'll upload it somewhere ...
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <
stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Could we add all the code in a svn somewhere?
Stef
On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Usman Bhatti wrote:
tx
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel <
alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:
Apparently, gmail does not like my email. I put it on dropbox http://dl.dropbox.com/u/31543901/petomse.zip
Cheers, Alexandre
On 28 Sep 2011, at 09:26, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I just sent the code to the mailing list. I will send it privately if it is not accepted by the list.
Cheers, Alexandre
On 28 Sep 2011, at 08:31, Usman Bhatti wrote:
Alex,
If you could share the code that you create with MS guys, it would
be great ... just to compare the two implementations and learn a few lessons :-)
thanx
Usman
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti <
usman.bhatti@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <
stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Sorry, I missed this email We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and
their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.
Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite
expressive.
But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST
analysis?
what is the license of CCI?
CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries
to manipulate MSIL (i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create static analyzers with these tools.
Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license
Comparison of the two frameworks:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and-...
- Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant ..
Alexandre
On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> alex can you reply? > > Stef > > On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> what model did you extract? >> inside methods? >> symbol resolved? >> because get package, class and inheritance should be simple. >> >> >> On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> >>> Hi ! >>> >>> Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to
generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.
>>> >>> Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting
the data. I can share the code if you wish.
>>> >>> Cheers, >>> Alexandre >>> >>> >>> -- >>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
There is no problem to turn the code into MIT. Usman, do you have time to fix the source files? I could do it else.
Alexandre
On 10 Oct 2011, at 11:02, Usman Bhatti wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com wrote: I like the idea, but we should be cautious. As you can see, the source are Microsoft copyrighted. Peli and I did this as a proof of concept and as an opportunity to code together. We did not talk about distributing it.
Ok let me know, and I'll remove the code from the svn or make it private, if possible.
I will talk to him about that.
Alexandre
On 9 Oct 2011, at 07:55, Usman Bhatti wrote:
I added the project here with some related info from the mail on the list.
http://code.google.com/p/moosecciextractor/
If someone needs access, send me a mail.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote: ok i'll upload it somewhere ...
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse@inria.fr wrote: Could we add all the code in a svn somewhere?
Stef
On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Usman Bhatti wrote:
tx
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com wrote: Apparently, gmail does not like my email. I put it on dropbox http://dl.dropbox.com/u/31543901/petomse.zip
Cheers, Alexandre
On 28 Sep 2011, at 09:26, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I just sent the code to the mailing list. I will send it privately if it is not accepted by the list.
Cheers, Alexandre
On 28 Sep 2011, at 08:31, Usman Bhatti wrote:
Alex,
If you could share the code that you create with MS guys, it would be great ... just to compare the two implementations and learn a few lessons :-)
thanx
Usman
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse@inria.fr wrote:
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Sorry, I missed this email We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.
Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite expressive.
But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis? what is the license of CCI?
CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries to manipulate MSIL (i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create static analyzers with these tools.
Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license
Comparison of the two frameworks: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and-...
- Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant ..
Alexandre
On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> alex can you reply? > > Stef > > On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> what model did you extract? >> inside methods? >> symbol resolved? >> because get package, class and inheritance should be simple. >> >> >> On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> >>> Hi ! >>> >>> Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time. >>> >>> Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the code if you wish. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Alexandre >>> >>> >>> -- >>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Fixing source files = adding MIT headers? I can do it over the weekend.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.comwrote:
There is no problem to turn the code into MIT. Usman, do you have time to fix the source files? I could do it else.
Alexandre
On 10 Oct 2011, at 11:02, Usman Bhatti wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Alexandre Bergel <
alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:
I like the idea, but we should be cautious. As you can see, the source
are Microsoft copyrighted. Peli and I did this as a proof of concept and as an opportunity to code together. We did not talk about distributing it.
Ok let me know, and I'll remove the code from the svn or make it private,
if possible.
I will talk to him about that.
Alexandre
On 9 Oct 2011, at 07:55, Usman Bhatti wrote:
I added the project here with some related info from the mail on the
list.
http://code.google.com/p/moosecciextractor/
If someone needs access, send me a mail.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com
wrote:
ok i'll upload it somewhere ...
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <
stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Could we add all the code in a svn somewhere?
Stef
On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Usman Bhatti wrote:
tx
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel <
alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:
Apparently, gmail does not like my email. I put it on dropbox http://dl.dropbox.com/u/31543901/petomse.zip
Cheers, Alexandre
On 28 Sep 2011, at 09:26, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I just sent the code to the mailing list. I will send it privately if it is not accepted by the list.
Cheers, Alexandre
On 28 Sep 2011, at 08:31, Usman Bhatti wrote:
Alex,
If you could share the code that you create with MS guys, it would
be great ... just to compare the two implementations and learn a few lessons :-)
thanx
Usman
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti <
usman.bhatti@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <
stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
> Sorry, I missed this email > We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and
their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.
> > Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite
expressive.
But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST
analysis?
what is the license of CCI?
CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide
libraries to manipulate MSIL (i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create static analyzers with these tools.
Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license
Comparison of the two frameworks:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and-...
- Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant ..
> > Alexandre > > > On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> alex can you reply? >> >> Stef >> >> On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> >>> what model did you extract? >>> inside methods? >>> symbol resolved? >>> because get package, class and inheritance should be simple. >>> >>> >>> On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >>> >>>> Hi ! >>>> >>>> Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft
to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.
>>>> >>>> Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting
the data. I can share the code if you wish.
>>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Alexandre >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Ok I got it.
Stef
On Sep 28, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse@inria.fr wrote:
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Sorry, I missed this email We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.
Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite expressive.
But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis? what is the license of CCI?
CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries to manipulate MSIL (i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create static analyzers with these tools.
Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license
Comparison of the two frameworks: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and-...
- Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant ..
Alexandre
On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
alex can you reply?
Stef
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
what model did you extract? inside methods? symbol resolved? because get package, class and inheritance should be simple.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi !
Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.
Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the code if you wish.
Cheers, Alexandre
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba -
Usman Bhatti