Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ
New issue 733 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ does not export modifiers http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=733
public abstract class A { ... }
should appear as
( (FAMIX.Class (name 'A') (modifiers 'public' 'abstract') )
Similar things should happen to methods and attributes.
It seems this part needs some cleaning up.
why should we have
(isAbstract true) (isPublic true) and (modifiers 'abstract' 'public')
nicolas
----- Mail original -----
De: moose-technology@googlecode.com À: moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch Envoyé: Lundi 24 Octobre 2011 09:34:43 Objet: [Moose-dev] Issue 733 in moose-technology: VerveineJ does not export modifiers Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ
New issue 733 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ does not export modifiers http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=733
public abstract class A { ... }
should appear as
( (FAMIX.Class (name 'A') (modifiers 'public' 'abstract') )
Similar things should happen to methods and attributes.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
We should not.
Only: (modifiers 'abstract' 'public')
Cheers, Doru
On 28 Oct 2011, at 17:42, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
It seems this part needs some cleaning up.
why should we have
(isAbstract true) (isPublic true)and (modifiers 'abstract' 'public')
nicolas
----- Mail original -----
De: moose-technology@googlecode.com À: moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch Envoyé: Lundi 24 Octobre 2011 09:34:43 Objet: [Moose-dev] Issue 733 in moose-technology: VerveineJ does not export modifiers Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ
New issue 733 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ does not export modifiers http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=733
public abstract class A { ... }
should appear as
( (FAMIX.Class (name 'A') (modifiers 'public' 'abstract') )
Similar things should happen to methods and attributes.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"In a world where everything is moving ever faster, one might have better chances to win by moving slower."
good
I guess same thing goes for private and protected
and final ?
nicolas
----- Mail original -----
De: "Tudor Girba" tudor@tudorgirba.com À: "Moose-related development" moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch Envoyé: Vendredi 28 Octobre 2011 20:54:30 Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: Issue 733 in moose-technology: VerveineJ does not export modifiers We should not.
Only: (modifiers 'abstract' 'public')
Cheers, Doru
On 28 Oct 2011, at 17:42, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
It seems this part needs some cleaning up.
why should we have
(isAbstract true) (isPublic true)and (modifiers 'abstract' 'public')
nicolas
----- Mail original -----
De: moose-technology@googlecode.com À: moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch Envoyé: Lundi 24 Octobre 2011 09:34:43 Objet: [Moose-dev] Issue 733 in moose-technology: VerveineJ does not export modifiers Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ
New issue 733 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ does not export modifiers http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=733
public abstract class A { ... }
should appear as
( (FAMIX.Class (name 'A') (modifiers 'public' 'abstract') )
Similar things should happen to methods and attributes.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"In a world where everything is moving ever faster, one might have better chances to win by moving slower."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Yes. And package.
Doru
On 29 Oct 2011, at 09:47, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
good
I guess same thing goes for private and protected
and final ?
nicolas
----- Mail original -----
De: "Tudor Girba" tudor@tudorgirba.com À: "Moose-related development" moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch Envoyé: Vendredi 28 Octobre 2011 20:54:30 Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: Issue 733 in moose-technology: VerveineJ does not export modifiers We should not.
Only: (modifiers 'abstract' 'public')
Cheers, Doru
On 28 Oct 2011, at 17:42, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
It seems this part needs some cleaning up.
why should we have
(isAbstract true) (isPublic true)and (modifiers 'abstract' 'public')
nicolas
----- Mail original -----
De: moose-technology@googlecode.com À: moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch Envoyé: Lundi 24 Octobre 2011 09:34:43 Objet: [Moose-dev] Issue 733 in moose-technology: VerveineJ does not export modifiers Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ
New issue 733 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ does not export modifiers http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=733
public abstract class A { ... }
should appear as
( (FAMIX.Class (name 'A') (modifiers 'public' 'abstract') )
Similar things should happen to methods and attributes.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"In a world where everything is moving ever faster, one might have better chances to win by moving slower."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Be rather willing to give than demanding to get."
Updates: Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 733 by anquetil...@gmail.com: VerveineJ does not export modifiers http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=733
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Updates: Labels: Milestone-4.6
Comment #2 on issue 733 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: VerveineJ does not export modifiers http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=733
Excellent. I just tested and it works.
I believe that now we should update the accessor methods in FAMIXNamedEntity such as isPublic, isPrivate, etc, since now we have in modifiers, for example: "public" instead of "isPublic".
So now if I call #isPublic for a public method I will have false.
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 7:36 AM, moose-technology@googlecode.com wrote:
Updates: Labels: Milestone-4.6
Comment #2 on issue 733 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: VerveineJ does not export modifiers http://code.google.com/p/**moose-technology/issues/**detail?id=733http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=733
Excellent. I just tested and it works.
______________________________**_________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/**mailman/listinfo/moose-devhttps://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
It's already done. Just update.
Doru
On Nov 1, 2011, at 18:59, Andre Hora andrehoraa@gmail.com wrote:
I believe that now we should update the accessor methods in FAMIXNamedEntity such as isPublic, isPrivate, etc, since now we have in modifiers, for example: "public" instead of "isPublic".
So now if I call #isPublic for a public method I will have false.
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 7:36 AM, moose-technology@googlecode.com wrote: Updates: Labels: Milestone-4.6
Comment #2 on issue 733 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: VerveineJ does not export modifiers http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=733
Excellent. I just tested and it works.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- Andre Hora
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-
Andre Hora -
moose-technology＠googlecode.com -
Nicolas Anquetil -
Tudor Girba