On Jun 15, 2011, at 8:54 PM, Mircea Filip Lungu wrote:
Doru,
Thanks for the answers!
You know that Moose 4 is really sexy and I intend to port the core of Softwarenaut to
Pharo, only that I am waiting for the right time and the right person to help me with that
:) And maybe that time is soon :))
I hope :)
Because else nobody will ever give feedback to VerveineJ and C# and when we will not have
engineers and people to help it will be too late.
Cheers,
M.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi Mircea,
I think that what Stef wants to say is that with all the great features we put in Moose
4.*, we must be doing a very bad job at marketing to not be able to convince someone to
use it :)
But, yes, it is unlikely that someone will ever maintain FAMIX 2.1-based tools.
Cheers,
Doru
On 10 Jun 2011, at 09:08, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Mircea
you send us a pretty bad message. In essence that all the efforts we spent over the last
years are useless.
How this is possible that you are not interested in all the efforts we did?
Famix 2.1 is dead since a long time and we will not maintain it at ALL!
Stef
Hi guys,
Anybody used the C# importer recently? Do you know
if it exports in FAMIX 2.1? I'm a bit behind the trend with
Softwarenaut and would like to apply it on a case study :)
Cheers,
M.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Beauty is where we see it."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev