Hi,
I spent a couple of hours cleaning configurations. It is better, but it is highly brittle. We need tools to reason about configurations. This should be a good Moose project.
Until now: - I went through the configurations of Moose, Mondrian, Glamour, EyeSee, Fame and pointed repositories to STHub - I cleaned the #baseline to point to #development version instead of hardcoded versions for Moose projects. - I made #development versions point to the latest baseline. Like this we can always load #development and get the very latest of the Moose code. - removed Shout from Glamour and Mondrian - removed RB and RPackage from GToolkit
Still, it appears that the ConfigurationOfMondrian has some problems.
Cheers, Doru
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how it cannot be done."
On Mar 8, 2013, at 8:23 AM, Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com wrote:
Hi,
I spent a couple of hours cleaning configurations. It is better, but it is highly brittle. We need tools to reason about configurations. This should be a good Moose project.
Cool!
Until now:
- I went through the configurations of Moose, Mondrian, Glamour, EyeSee, Fame and pointed repositories to STHub
- I cleaned the #baseline to point to #development version instead of hardcoded versions for Moose projects.
is it not the inverse? the development should point to the baseline?
- I made #development versions point to the latest baseline. Like this we can always load #development and get the very latest of the Moose code.
- removed Shout from Glamour and Mondrian
- removed RB and RPackage from GToolkit
Still, it appears that the ConfigurationOfMondrian has some problems.
Cheers, Doru
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how it cannot be done."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Hi,
On Mar 8, 2013, at 9:12 AM, stephane ducasse stephane.ducasse@free.fr wrote:
On Mar 8, 2013, at 8:23 AM, Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com wrote:
Hi,
I spent a couple of hours cleaning configurations. It is better, but it is highly brittle. We need tools to reason about configurations. This should be a good Moose project.
Cool!
Until now:
- I went through the configurations of Moose, Mondrian, Glamour, EyeSee, Fame and pointed repositories to STHub
- I cleaned the #baseline to point to #development version instead of hardcoded versions for Moose projects.
is it not the inverse? the development should point to the baseline?
I was unclear.
In the baseline definition we should refer only to the #development versions of the subparts. For example:
ConfigurationOfMoose>>baseline48: spec <version: '4.8-baseline'> ... spec project: 'Glamour for Moose' with: [ spec className: 'ConfigurationOfGlamour'; file: 'ConfigurationOfGlamour'; version: #development; repository: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Glamour/main' ].
- I made #development versions point to the latest baseline. Like this we can always load #development and get the very latest of the Moose code.
and, indeed we make the #development version to point to a baseline of the current configuration:
ConfigurationOfMoose>>development: spec <symbolicVersion: #'development'>
spec for: #'pharo1.4.x' version: '4.7-STHub-baseline'. spec for: #'pharo2.x' version: '4.8-baseline'.
Like this, all projects can evolve independently and we ensure that they still integrate well on head.
Cheers, Doru
- removed Shout from Glamour and Mondrian
- removed RB and RPackage from GToolkit
Still, it appears that the ConfigurationOfMondrian has some problems.
Cheers, Doru
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how it cannot be done."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
-
stephane ducasse -
Tudor Girba