16 Mar
2011
16 Mar
'11
7:59 a.m.
Hi,
It looks like we finally managed to get Glamour to unregister properly from model
announcements (thanks to Henrik and Esteban).
It would be nice to have more tests around this. Jorge started to use his nice meta-engine
to provide some fine grained instrumentation so that we can test this in a different way.
In the meantime, let us know if you still have problems with garbage collecting a model
(MooseModel or otherwise) after opening a Glamour browser.
This is a critical point in getting Glamour to be used on a larger scale. It would be so
great if this would actually work properly :)
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go."
16 Mar
16 Mar
1:29 p.m.
Was this the remaining obstacle from being able to have a browser updated?
Alexandre
On 16 Mar 2011, at 02:59, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
It looks like we finally managed to get Glamour to unregister properly from model
announcements (thanks to Henrik and Esteban).
It would be nice to have more tests around this. Jorge started to use his nice
meta-engine to provide some fine grained instrumentation so that we can test this in a
different way.
In the meantime, let us know if you still have problems with garbage collecting a model
(MooseModel or otherwise) after opening a Glamour browser.
This is a critical point in getting Glamour to be used on a larger scale. It would be so
great if this would actually work properly :)
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
12:40 p.m.
No. The update works since 1 year :)
The problem was that after registering a Glamour browser to an announcement raised by a
model, you would risk not being able to garbage collect the model after closing the
browser.
For example, in the case of Moose, you loaded a model, played with it in the MoosePanel,
then delete the model, close the panel, and the model would still linger around getting
your image to grow constantly as you played some more.
Cheers,
Doru
On 16 Mar 2011, at 13:29, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Was this the remaining obstacle from being able to
have a browser updated?
Alexandre
On 16 Mar 2011, at 02:59, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Being happy is a matter of choice."
Hi,
It looks like we finally managed to get Glamour to unregister properly from model
announcements (thanks to Henrik and Esteban).
It would be nice to have more tests around this. Jorge started to use his nice
meta-engine to provide some fine grained instrumentation so that we can test this in a
different way.
In the meantime, let us know if you still have problems with garbage collecting a model
(MooseModel or otherwise) after opening a Glamour browser.
This is a critical point in getting Glamour to be used on a larger scale. It would be so
great if this would actually work properly :)
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
3:58 p.m.
Oh yes! I have been bitten by this a couple of times.
Alexandre
On 16 Mar 2011, at 07:40, Tudor Girba wrote:
No. The update works since 1 year :)
The problem was that after registering a Glamour browser to an announcement raised by a
model, you would risk not being able to garbage collect the model after closing the
browser.
For example, in the case of Moose, you loaded a model, played with it in the MoosePanel,
then delete the model, close the panel, and the model would still linger around getting
your image to grow constantly as you played some more.
Cheers,
Doru
On 16 Mar 2011, at 13:29, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Was this the remaining obstacle from being able
to have a browser updated?
Alexandre
On 16 Mar 2011, at 02:59, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Being happy is a matter of choice."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi,
It looks like we finally managed to get Glamour to unregister properly from model
announcements (thanks to Henrik and Esteban).
It would be nice to have more tests around this. Jorge started to use his nice
meta-engine to provide some fine grained instrumentation so that we can test this in a
different way.
In the meantime, let us know if you still have problems with garbage collecting a model
(MooseModel or otherwise) after opening a Glamour browser.
This is a critical point in getting Glamour to be used on a larger scale. It would be so
great if this would actually work properly :)
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
5030
days inactive
5030
days old
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Tudor Girba