Hi!
This will have an impact on us.
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html
Alexandre
Hi,
Thats another reason to choose the Indie Web[1], instead of centralized one. In the case of source code repositories, my bet is for Fossil-SCM[2]. It's self-contained, minimal (~1mb for DVCS, Wiki and bug tracker and web interface) and runs almost anywhere.
[1] http://indiewebcamp.com/ [2] http://fossil-scm.org/
Just my two cents.
Cheers,
Offray
El 12/03/15 a las 16:05, Alexandre Bergel escribió:
Hi!
This will have an impact on us.
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html
Alexandre
But, what is wrong in using a github project for the issues ?
Alexandre
Github follows the current trend of the web of "user generated data" which has value in "centralized metadata". In this case data is the code and metadata are all conversations about it (including tickets, issues conversations and so on) that rely on a lock-in infrastructure. You can move your code, but metadata will be still centralized. With fossil all data is decentralized and less dependent on a single provider. This gives more resilience. The only issue is that the interface of fossil is more "raw" compared with the one of github.
For me keeping the web away of centralization in cases like this is better that relying of few places for discovery and deployment (Google, Amazon, Facebook, GitHub).
Cheers,
Offray
El 12/03/15 a las 18:25, Alexandre Bergel escribió:
But, what is wrong in using a github project for the issues ?
Alexandre
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Mar 12, 2015, at 7:52 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas <offray@riseup.net mailto:offray@riseup.net> wrote:
Hi,
Thats another reason to choose the Indie Web[1], instead of centralized one. In the case of source code repositories, my bet is for Fossil-SCM[2]. It's self-contained, minimal (~1mb for DVCS, Wiki and bug tracker and web interface) and runs almost anywhere.
[1] http://indiewebcamp.com/ [2] http://fossil-scm.org/
Just my two cents.
Cheers,
Offray
El 12/03/15 a las 16:05, Alexandre Bergel escribió:
Hi!
This will have an impact on us.
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html
Alexandre
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch mailto:Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
I guess Doru will choose the appropriate platform for him, but +1 for using github issues. Apparently there is a Google 2 github exporter: https://code.google.com/export-to-github/
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com wrote:
But, what is wrong in using a github project for the issues ?
Alexandre
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Mar 12, 2015, at 7:52 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas offray@riseup.net wrote:
Hi,
Thats another reason to choose the Indie Web[1], instead of centralized one. In the case of source code repositories, my bet is for Fossil-SCM[2]. It's self-contained, minimal (~1mb for DVCS, Wiki and bug tracker and web interface) and runs almost anywhere.
[1] http://indiewebcamp.com/ [2] http://fossil-scm.org/
Just my two cents.
Cheers,
Offray
El 12/03/15 a las 16:05, Alexandre Bergel escribió:
Hi!
This will have an impact on us.
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html
Alexandre
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
On 13-03-15 09:40, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
I guess Doru will choose the appropriate platform for him, but +1 for using github issues. Apparently there is a Google 2 github exporter: https://code.google.com/export-to-github/
That doesn't work for moose. It only allows 1000 issues to be migrated.
Stephan