25 Jul
2015
25 Jul
'15
9:30 p.m.
Hi!
I am experimenting something. There are several Roassal contributions around, and I try to
make them easily accessible. I have designed a very simple plugin system, accessible
within the world menu:
Does this make sense?
Maybe we could have DynaCase accessible here
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
25 Jul
25 Jul
10:16 p.m.
Maybe we could have DynaCase accessible here
Well that is not a mere Roassal plugin, but an independent application...
plus it's not really in a production-ready state.
I can revisit it later, but I don't think it would make much sense,
considering just by loading Roassal you would be loading ton of other
unrelated packges which will even more increase the overall size...
Also what I spoke with GT guys there is an idea of visual editors...
however dynacase is not ready for either.
... in fact it would might make sense to make all builders as plugins, so
one can load just the core Roassal without all the builders.
Peter
10:27 p.m.
Aha,
it runs Gofer... I thought it was packaged with Roassal, so I take part of
what I said back.
That said, it seems like an interesting idea to connect with Catalog
Browser; that people could mark their package as Roassal plugin and you
easily install it from there also (so people can themselves decide whether
it makes sense or not).
But that's for discussion between you and Catalog Browser authors...
Peter
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe we could have DynaCase accessible here
Well that is not a mere Roassal plugin, but an independent application...
plus it's not really in a production-ready state.
I can revisit it later, but I don't think it would make much sense,
considering just by loading Roassal you would be loading ton of other
unrelated packges which will even more increase the overall size...
Also what I spoke with GT guys there is an idea of visual editors...
however dynacase is not ready for either.
... in fact it would might make sense to make all builders as plugins, so
one can load just the core Roassal without all the builders.
Peter
10:34 p.m.
Yes, I have also thought about that. Ideally, having it connected with the catalogue would
be great. One step at the time...
Alexandre
On Jul 25, 2015, at 10:27 PM, Peter Uhnák
<i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Aha,
it runs Gofer... I thought it was packaged with Roassal, so I take part of what I said
back.
That said, it seems like an interesting idea to connect with Catalog Browser; that people
could mark their package as Roassal plugin and you easily install it from there also (so
people can themselves decide whether it makes sense or not).
But that's for discussion between you and Catalog Browser authors...
Peter
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe we could have DynaCase accessible here
Well that is not a mere Roassal plugin, but an independent application... plus it's
not really in a production-ready state.
I can revisit it later, but I don't think it would make much sense, considering just
by loading Roassal you would be loading ton of other unrelated packges which will even
more increase the overall size...
Also what I spoke with GT guys there is an idea of visual editors... however dynacase is
not ready for either.
... in fact it would might make sense to make all builders as plugins, so one can load
just the core Roassal without all the builders.
Peter
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
10:33 p.m.
... in fact it would might make sense to make all
builders as plugins, so one can load just the core Roassal without all the builders.
Yes!
For large builder, probably we will need them as a plugin. However, I do not see a need
for refactoring this part of the system. Roassal is large, but perfectly manageable.
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
3438
days inactive
3438
days old
4 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Peter Uhnák