Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ
New issue 637 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should show an invocation to the default constructor http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=637
A call to the default constructor should be modeled like: - create a stub constructor in the target class - create an invocation to the constructor
See the attached class for a sample.
Attachments: DefaultConstructor.java 184 bytes
Updates: Cc: anquetil...@gmail.com
Comment #1 on issue 637 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should show an invocation to the default constructor http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=637
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Comment #2 on issue 637 by anquetil...@gmail.com: VerveineJ should show an invocation to the default constructor http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=637
Not sure I got it.
You mean that any "new XXX(...)" instruction should produce: - a reference to the class XXX - an invocation of the constructor XXX.XXX(...)
?
Comment #3 on issue 637 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should show an invocation to the default constructor http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=637
Yes :)
Updates: Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 637 by anquetil...@gmail.com: VerveineJ should show an invocation to the default constructor http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=637
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Updates: Labels: Maintainability
Comment #5 on issue 637 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should show an invocation to the default constructor http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=637
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Updates: Labels: Milestone-4.7
Comment #6 on issue 637 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should show an invocation to the default constructor http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=637
(No comment was entered for this change.)