Hi
How can I get the moose name of a smalltalk class? I tried mooseUniqueName
Point mooseUniqueName
Stef
absoluteFamixName
could we use instead mooseUniqueName and deprecated absoluteFamixName This way we could manupilate classes and famixClass a bit the same way
Stef On 22 nov. 07, at 15:49, stephane ducasse wrote:
Hi
How can I get the moose name of a smalltalk class? I tried mooseUniqueName
Point mooseUniqueName
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Do you have a use case for this, other than the tests?
Doru
On Nov 22, 2007, at 9:34 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
absoluteFamixName
could we use instead mooseUniqueName and deprecated absoluteFamixName This way we could manupilate classes and famixClass a bit the same way
Stef On 22 nov. 07, at 15:49, stephane ducasse wrote:
Hi
How can I get the moose name of a smalltalk class? I tried mooseUniqueName
Point mooseUniqueName
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"Beauty is where we see it."
Debugging import and other shit (like I'm forced to do) and having a nice common interface. Why do I have to remember two method names conceptually returning the same result in a language with late binding?
I want the moose name of an entity been a class or a famixclass why should they have different names? Really
Do you have a use case for this, other than the tests?
Dor
Go forward, fix it. (my only concern was that unique should not be part of the selector)
AA
On 23 Nov 2007, at 8:42 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Debugging import and other shit (like I'm forced to do) and having a nice common interface. Why do I have to remember two method names conceptually returning the same result in a language with late binding?
I want the moose name of an entity been a class or a famixclass why should they have different names? Really
Do you have a use case for this, other than the tests?
Dor
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Please do the other way round, kick mooseUniqueName and make absoluteFamixName the default. Names are not unique in Moose for several reasons. Actually that method should have been removed/ renamed long time ago, as its name is dangerously misleading...
AA
On 22 Nov 2007, at 21:34 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
absoluteFamixName
could we use instead mooseUniqueName and deprecated absoluteFamixName This way we could manupilate classes and famixClass a bit the same way
Stef On 22 nov. 07, at 15:49, stephane ducasse wrote:
Hi
How can I get the moose name of a smalltalk class? I tried mooseUniqueName
Point mooseUniqueName
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
That is true. We can rename it to mooseName.
Doru
On Nov 22, 2007, at 10:36 PM, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Please do the other way round, kick mooseUniqueName and make absoluteFamixName the default. Names are not unique in Moose for several reasons. Actually that method should have been removed/ renamed long time ago, as its name is dangerously misleading...
AA
On 22 Nov 2007, at 21:34 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
absoluteFamixName
could we use instead mooseUniqueName and deprecated absoluteFamixName This way we could manupilate classes and famixClass a bit the same way
Stef On 22 nov. 07, at 15:49, stephane ducasse wrote:
Hi
How can I get the moose name of a smalltalk class? I tried mooseUniqueName
Point mooseUniqueName
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."
So in that case we should rename to two to mooseName. Which is also ok for me.
Stef
That is true. We can rename it to mooseName.
Doru
On Nov 22, 2007, at 10:36 PM, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Please do the other way round, kick mooseUniqueName and make absoluteFamixName the default. Names are not unique in Moose for several reasons. Actually that method should have been removed/ renamed long time ago, as its name is dangerously misleading...
AA
On 22 Nov 2007, at 21:34 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
absoluteFamixName
could we use instead mooseUniqueName and deprecated absoluteFamixName This way we could manupilate classes and famixClass a bit the same way
Stef On 22 nov. 07, at 15:49, stephane ducasse wrote:
Hi
How can I get the moose name of a smalltalk class? I tried mooseUniqueName
Point mooseUniqueName
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Oops, I forgot to read my mails newest first.
AA
On 23 Nov 2007, at 8:42 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
So in that case we should rename to two to mooseName. Which is also ok for me.
Stef
That is true. We can rename it to mooseName.
Doru
On Nov 22, 2007, at 10:36 PM, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Please do the other way round, kick mooseUniqueName and make absoluteFamixName the default. Names are not unique in Moose for several reasons. Actually that method should have been removed/ renamed long time ago, as its name is dangerously misleading...
AA
On 22 Nov 2007, at 21:34 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
absoluteFamixName
could we use instead mooseUniqueName and deprecated absoluteFamixName This way we could manupilate classes and famixClass a bit the same way
Stef On 22 nov. 07, at 15:49, stephane ducasse wrote:
Hi
How can I get the moose name of a smalltalk class? I tried mooseUniqueName
Point mooseUniqueName
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
So do I do it? deprecating the old one?
Stef
On 23 nov. 07, at 15:26, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Oops, I forgot to read my mails newest first.
AA
On 23 Nov 2007, at 8:42 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
So in that case we should rename to two to mooseName. Which is also ok for me.
Stef
That is true. We can rename it to mooseName.
Doru
On Nov 22, 2007, at 10:36 PM, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Please do the other way round, kick mooseUniqueName and make absoluteFamixName the default. Names are not unique in Moose for several reasons. Actually that method should have been removed/ renamed long time ago, as its name is dangerously misleading...
AA
On 22 Nov 2007, at 21:34 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
absoluteFamixName
could we use instead mooseUniqueName and deprecated absoluteFamixName This way we could manupilate classes and famixClass a bit the same way
Stef On 22 nov. 07, at 15:49, stephane ducasse wrote:
Hi
How can I get the moose name of a smalltalk class? I tried mooseUniqueName
Point mooseUniqueName
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Yes, please.
Doru
On Nov 25, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
So do I do it? deprecating the old one?
Stef
On 23 nov. 07, at 15:26, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Oops, I forgot to read my mails newest first.
AA
On 23 Nov 2007, at 8:42 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
So in that case we should rename to two to mooseName. Which is also ok for me.
Stef
That is true. We can rename it to mooseName.
Doru
On Nov 22, 2007, at 10:36 PM, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Please do the other way round, kick mooseUniqueName and make absoluteFamixName the default. Names are not unique in Moose for several reasons. Actually that method should have been removed/ renamed long time ago, as its name is dangerously misleading...
AA
On 22 Nov 2007, at 21:34 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
absoluteFamixName
could we use instead mooseUniqueName and deprecated absoluteFamixName This way we could manupilate classes and famixClass a bit the same way
Stef On 22 nov. 07, at 15:49, stephane ducasse wrote:
> Hi > > How can I get the moose name of a smalltalk class? > I tried mooseUniqueName > > Point mooseUniqueName > > Stef > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."
ok I would but now I do not know the license of the method so I cannot do it. And I'm considering to republish all my code since moose 2.0 as GPL. This way I will be sure that nobody will ever do anything with Moose without me knowing it. I can also play this little and funny game. Too fun in fact.
Stef
Yes, please.
Doru
On Nov 25, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
So do I do it? deprecating the old one?
Stef
On 23 nov. 07, at 15:26, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Oops, I forgot to read my mails newest first.
AA
On 23 Nov 2007, at 8:42 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
So in that case we should rename to two to mooseName. Which is also ok for me.
Stef
That is true. We can rename it to mooseName.
Doru
On Nov 22, 2007, at 10:36 PM, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Please do the other way round, kick mooseUniqueName and make absoluteFamixName the default. Names are not unique in Moose for several reasons. Actually that method should have been removed/ renamed long time ago, as its name is dangerously misleading...
AA
On 22 Nov 2007, at 21:34 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> absoluteFamixName > > could we use instead mooseUniqueName and deprecated > absoluteFamixName > This way we could manupilate classes and famixClass a bit the > same > way > > Stef > On 22 nov. 07, at 15:49, stephane ducasse wrote: > >> Hi >> >> How can I get the moose name of a smalltalk class? >> I tried mooseUniqueName >> >> Point mooseUniqueName >> >> Stef >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
I was thinking that instead of mooseName it would be better to have famixName
Any preferences?
Stef
Yes, please.
Doru
On Nov 25, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
So do I do it? deprecating the old one?
Stef
On 23 nov. 07, at 15:26, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Oops, I forgot to read my mails newest first.
AA
On 23 Nov 2007, at 8:42 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
So in that case we should rename to two to mooseName. Which is also ok for me.
Stef
That is true. We can rename it to mooseName.
Doru
On Nov 22, 2007, at 10:36 PM, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Please do the other way round, kick mooseUniqueName and make absoluteFamixName the default. Names are not unique in Moose for several reasons. Actually that method should have been removed/ renamed long time ago, as its name is dangerously misleading...
AA
On 22 Nov 2007, at 21:34 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> absoluteFamixName > > could we use instead mooseUniqueName and deprecated > absoluteFamixName > This way we could manupilate classes and famixClass a bit the > same > way > > Stef > On 22 nov. 07, at 15:49, stephane ducasse wrote: > >> Hi >> >> How can I get the moose name of a smalltalk class? >> I tried mooseUniqueName >> >> Point mooseUniqueName >> >> Stef >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
I prefer mooseName, because it is about the implementation and it should be usable for any Smalltalk class. FAMIX is the conceptual model.
Doru
On Nov 25, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
I was thinking that instead of mooseName it would be better to have famixName
Any preferences?
Stef
Yes, please.
Doru
On Nov 25, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
So do I do it? deprecating the old one?
Stef
On 23 nov. 07, at 15:26, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Oops, I forgot to read my mails newest first.
AA
On 23 Nov 2007, at 8:42 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
So in that case we should rename to two to mooseName. Which is also ok for me.
Stef
That is true. We can rename it to mooseName.
Doru
On Nov 22, 2007, at 10:36 PM, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
> Please do the other way round, kick mooseUniqueName and make > absoluteFamixName the default. Names are not unique in Moose for > several reasons. Actually that method should have been removed/ > renamed long time ago, as its name is dangerously misleading... > > AA > > > > On 22 Nov 2007, at 21:34 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> absoluteFamixName >> >> could we use instead mooseUniqueName and deprecated >> absoluteFamixName >> This way we could manupilate classes and famixClass a bit the >> same >> way >> >> Stef >> On 22 nov. 07, at 15:49, stephane ducasse wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> How can I get the moose name of a smalltalk class? >>> I tried mooseUniqueName >>> >>> Point mooseUniqueName >>> >>> Stef >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"Beauty is where we see it."
ok in addition it is consistent with the mooseModel and other methods.... I'm doing it right now.
STef
should be usable for any Smalltalk class. FAMIX is the conceptual model.
Doru
On Nov 25, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
I was thinking that instead of mooseName it would be better to have famixName
Any preferences?
Stef
Yes, please.
Doru
On Nov 25, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
So do I do it? deprecating the old one?
Stef
On 23 nov. 07, at 15:26, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Oops, I forgot to read my mails newest first.
AA
On 23 Nov 2007, at 8:42 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
So in that case we should rename to two to mooseName. Which is also ok for me.
Stef
> That is true. We can rename it to mooseName. > > Doru > > On Nov 22, 2007, at 10:36 PM, Adrian Kuhn wrote: > >> Please do the other way round, kick mooseUniqueName and make >> absoluteFamixName the default. Names are not unique in Moose >> for >> several reasons. Actually that method should have been removed/ >> renamed long time ago, as its name is dangerously misleading... >> >> AA >> >> >> >> On 22 Nov 2007, at 21:34 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> >>> absoluteFamixName >>> >>> could we use instead mooseUniqueName and deprecated >>> absoluteFamixName >>> This way we could manupilate classes and famixClass a bit the >>> same >>> way >>> >>> Stef >>> On 22 nov. 07, at 15:49, stephane ducasse wrote: >>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> How can I get the moose name of a smalltalk class? >>>> I tried mooseUniqueName >>>> >>>> Point mooseUniqueName >>>> >>>> Stef >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > www.tudorgirba.com/blog > > "From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are > similar." > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"Beauty is where we see it."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-
Adrian Kuhn -
stephane ducasse -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba