FamixInheritance>>name - Moose-dev - INF Mailman

List overview All Threads
Download

FamixInheritance>>name

Fwd: [Esug-list] 18 months Postdoc...

commit discipline

Usman Bhatti

23 Nov 2011 23 Nov '11

6:44 p.m.

FamixInheritance>>name seems superflous because it overrides a superclass method with the same behavior. We tried to remove the entity but then a (seemingly unrelated) test is failing in FamixModelExtractionTest>>testReferenceModel. We didn't commit this change in the repository fearing that something might fail.

Attachments:

attachment.htm (text/html — 412 bytes)

Reply

Show replies by date

Tudor Girba

23 Nov 23 Nov

7:58 p.m.

Good finding. I just removed it and the test does not fail. Most likely the failure was generated by something else. I committed. Doru On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com> wrote:

FamixInheritance>>name seems superflous because it overrides a superclass method with the same behavior. We tried to remove the entity but then a (seemingly unrelated) test is failing in FamixModelExtractionTest>>testReferenceModel. We didn't commit this change in the repository fearing that something might fail. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.uinibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Reply

Usman Bhatti

10:50 p.m.

Also we deleted FAMIXReference>>name and we committed it in the code. On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:

Good finding. I just removed it and the test does not fail. Most likely the failure was generated by something else. I committed. Doru On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com> wrote:

FamixInheritance>>name seems superflous because it overrides a superclass method with the same behavior. We tried to remove the entity but then a (seemingly unrelated) test is failing in FamixModelExtractionTest>>testReferenceModel. We didn't commit this change in the repository fearing that something

might

fail. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.uinibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow" _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Reply

Tudor Girba

24 Nov 24 Nov

8:20 a.m.

Thanks. Doru On 23 Nov 2011, at 22:50, Usman Bhatti wrote:

Also we deleted FAMIXReference>>name and we committed it in the code. On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: Good finding. I just removed it and the test does not fail. Most likely the failure was generated by something else. I committed. Doru On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com> wrote:

FamixInheritance>>name seems superflous because it overrides a superclass method with the same behavior. We tried to remove the entity but then a (seemingly unrelated) test is failing in FamixModelExtractionTest>>testReferenceModel. We didn't commit this change in the repository fearing that something might fail. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.uinibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow" _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- www.tudorgirba.com "We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go."

Reply

4777

days inactive

4778

days old

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

Manage subscription

3 comments

2 participants

tags (0)

participants (2)

Tudor Girba
Usman Bhatti