23 Apr
2010
23 Apr
'10
10:50 p.m.
I'm for especially since we would like to be able
to have pharo
objects as metamodel instead of FAMIX.
Indeed!!!
I would like to have numberOfMethods, numberOfLinesOfCode,
numberOfAttributes defined in Behavior.
Stef, does this make sense? Shall I produce a slice and put it
PharoInbox?
Alexandre
Stef
On Apr 23, 2010, at 8:05 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
hi!
What about adding in FAMIXClass:
withAllSubclasses, allSubclasses, superclasses,
withAllSuperclasses, allSuperclasses
FAMIXClass should be somewhat polymorphic to Behavior.
That would be useful... I can do it.
Any opinion?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev