Hi,
On 22 May 2012, at 07:09, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I've spent
some times on getting DSM work with Roassal. I need to spend more time on this.
I have committed some DSM packages. Several DSM examples now use Roassal. This is a good
exercise that stress Roassal.
Great. I took a look. It seems that the header row and column are movable, while they
should not be. It also seems that opening the DSM on a group of packages breaks now.
In any case, I think that the DSM should be rethought completely.
Is the _Usages_of_MOViewRenderer_ list updated?
That's cool.
I do not understand the question. This is a report that is generated automatically, like
running tests or SmallLint.
Cheers,
Doru
Cheers,
Alexandre
On May 18, 2012, at 4:10 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
Currently, there are some 63 relevant references to MOViewRenderer. These are the entry
points to the visualizations that we need to review in order to move to Roassal.
You can find the list here:
http://ci.moosetechnology.org/job/moose-on-moose/lastCompletedBuild/testRep…
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
Innovation comes in least expected form.
That is, if it is expected, it already happened.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Being happy is a matter of choice."